To: Gforce11
When articles like this start coming out from major media sources, it usually means we are planning to attack the mentioned country. N. Korea and Iraq at the same time?
10 posted on
01/15/2003 9:36:43 PM PST by
DBtoo
To: DBtoo
hmmm....
12 posted on
01/15/2003 9:49:09 PM PST by
paltz
To: DBtoo
Just watch the "History Channel" to see who we come to blows with next! Reminds me of Rumsfeld who recently said: "..we fight, we win". He was saying the way the world is now and the way our military is, we are at a singular point in time that if we are called on to fight, even if in more than one spot - we win. I believe that to be true if our military is called on to fight with a real purpose and a real enemy, and "at a time of our choosing" as Bush would say.
20 posted on
01/16/2003 1:15:24 AM PST by
geopyg
To: DBtoo
I would say that the reason you are seeing this now is so that the media can say, "See, we shouldn't be attacking Iraq, North Korea is worse". What they really mean is that we shouldn't attack North Korea either. Obfuscation (sp?) is the word I believe.
62 posted on
01/17/2003 10:11:17 AM PST by
cmak9
To: DBtoo
Iraq isn't going anywhere, may as well euthinize N. Korea first. We cannot survive if we fear the nuke.
63 posted on
01/17/2003 10:19:20 AM PST by
Dead Dog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson