Replies

...email Investor Relations and ask that they leave.

That's a little harsh. There is no reason to "attack" California or companies that want to reside there.

I do think that economics and "business climate" should dictate the decision as to where a company locates. I also think that companies owe it to their stockholders to re-evaluate that question every so often. An example is Boeing that moved its long-time headquarters from Seattle to Chicago. Having some business (and their employees) move out of Southern California could solve Air Pollution, lack of water, lack of new power plants, and a host of other problems that legislators don't want to deal with.

I do think that this article and decisions like this at various companies should be a wake up call for legislators and politicians who feel that they can impose any burden upon business and not worry about the results.

That's a little harsh. There is no reason to "attack" California or companies that want to reside there.

I don't want my dollars used to subsidize the spread of Marxism.

>>I do think that this article and decisions like this at various companies should be a wake up call for legislators and politicians <<

and VOTERS (of which I am one). I still can't believe my fellow Californians voted Gray-Panic-Away-the-Surplus Davis.

I live in a state infested with idiot lotus eaters. They don't see the damage they are doing by electing all these Liberal Lefties -- maybe when the tax gets high enough for them to feel the pinch they'll get the message. I'll hang on tight, grit my teeth, pay the damn socialists taxes and wait for the shoe to drop.