Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Once-Ler
In retro-spect you should be happy Lott made that deal.

Well, I'm not.

Splitting the funds 50-50 didn't get us one conservative judge appointed, did it? In fact it got us nothing but our hand bitten. If we'd stuck to 2/3-1/3, they might have demanded that when Jeffords jumped, but we'd have it back now and they'd have nothing to use as a weapon today. Lott and McPain gave them the weapon.

But I blame Lott the most.

75 posted on 01/14/2003 4:13:23 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: hellinahandcart
"but we'd have it back now and they'd have nothing to use as a weapon today"

We will have it back soon and the 'rats will have a black eye for it.
80 posted on 01/14/2003 4:25:38 PM PST by Once-Ler (I vote Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: hellinahandcart; TLBSHOW
But I blame Lott the most.

Amen! It was Lott that gave us the stupid "precedent" of 50-50 power sharing anyway. Thank GOD in Heaven he is no longer SML!!!!! Lott was a liability not an asset.

89 posted on 01/14/2003 4:35:22 PM PST by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson