Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/13/2003 6:21:44 PM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Great Dane; liliana; Alberta's Child; Entropy Squared; Rightwing Canuck; Loyalist; canuckwest; ...
-
2 posted on 01/13/2003 6:22:03 PM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
The border should no longer be seen as a demarcation line between Canada and the United States. It should simply be an internal checkpoint

Bugger 'internal checkpoints. That's dictator country and we don't need to start.

3 posted on 01/13/2003 6:25:44 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive

Bwahahha! Bwahahah!

Oh, right.

"Immigration" will destroy our health care system, "security" is laughable from the country that knowingly harbored hezbollah, and "defense" is particularly ironic from the people who fought us tooth and nail over SDI.

I seem to remember someone saying New Zeland gives more to NATO than Canada? It's been a while, so I might have that confused.. But there was some little nothing country that did far more than canada, who were basically shirking their responsibility and relying on the watch dog to the south to protect them.

4 posted on 01/13/2003 6:28:26 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (We have vays of making you zee the movie, mister Cmsgop.. You vill buy da action figures also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
The border should no longer be seen as a demarcation line between Canada and the United States.

I agree, completely. Once Canada agrees to become the 51st member of the United States of America...

If they don't like such an idea, than they can shut the hell up.

Eh, you Canuck hosers???

FReegards,

5 posted on 01/13/2003 6:30:34 PM PST by Capitalist Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
ok with me.

but i'm sure others not like-minded on this forum will have something to say.

6 posted on 01/13/2003 6:31:10 PM PST by koax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
"...''We are not talking about doing it the American way," he said..."

Wrong Answer.

8 posted on 01/13/2003 6:34:31 PM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
I've always been in favor of a partial American-Canadian Union. Canada should be broken up and Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchwan(sic), the Yukon and Northwest Territories should be admitted to the Union.
9 posted on 01/13/2003 6:40:10 PM PST by Sparta (Statism is a mental illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
''We are not talking about doing it the American way. What we are talking about in some instances are joint institutions, shared responsibility,'' he said.

In other words, Lets see what kind of FREE STUFF we can get the Rich Americans to pay for.

Hey Canada, BITE ME!

10 posted on 01/13/2003 6:42:21 PM PST by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Thank you.......we don't need any no defense having socilaist loving liberal no gun owning sissyboy europe loving surrender monkey alqueda harboring terror supporters around.
13 posted on 01/13/2003 6:53:10 PM PST by Puck from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Why am I not supprised that this spew is from Canada?
15 posted on 01/13/2003 7:06:59 PM PST by PRO 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Amalgamation of Canada and the United States of America.
25 posted on 01/13/2003 9:02:02 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Mr. D'Aquino, who will unveil the group's blueprint tomorrow, said there is a ''virtual certainty of further terrorist strikes on the North America homeland'' making it imperative for Canada to develop a new security and economic coalition with the United States or risk a loss of sovereignty.

Yup, there almost broke.

26 posted on 01/13/2003 9:47:38 PM PST by justrepublican (Remind me to get a haircut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
I'm glad that people are starting to see that open borders and free trade giveaways serve corporate interests only. Too bad so many Republicans are corporate sycophants willing to trade sovereignty and security for the promise of cheaper products and labor even though all we ever get is higher corporate profits. Not a bad deal if you own stock and don't live near the borders.
28 posted on 01/13/2003 11:14:38 PM PST by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
They may, or may not realize it, but they are ADMITTING THE FAILURE OF THEIR SOCIETY AND NATION-STATE.
30 posted on 01/14/2003 12:36:56 AM PST by CaptIsaacDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Dear Mr. Tom D'Aquino,

I don't effing think so.

Love,
Everyone south of the porous Canadian border.

32 posted on 01/14/2003 6:20:57 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Remember Technocracy?

Back in the '30s they were all for continentalism. Unfortunately, their version was founded on a laughably technocratic utopian rationale.

Union with Rome was exactly what the other Italian polities wanted 2200 years ago. Secretly, Canadians yearn for the same. ;^)

Those who fail to learn from history and etc.

So, Clive, how y'all doin'? ;^)
33 posted on 01/14/2003 6:21:39 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
We have a method for that.

To Canadian provinces : petition for statehood.

36 posted on 01/14/2003 7:18:00 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Darth Crackerhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson