Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ancient_geezer
Ah but compensation for services or labor is expressly included,

Geezer, compensation for services or labor is an ITEM of income, not a SOURCE of income. I'm not arguing that compensation for services or labor is not expressly included.

Your point on 26 USC 7701(c) is a good one, let me research that a bit.

101 posted on 01/14/2003 9:33:01 AM PST by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel
Geezer, compensation for services or labor is an ITEM of income, not a SOURCE of income.

Sorry, kiddo--that "What-is-the-meaning-of-is" s**t doesn't fly in court.

102 posted on 01/14/2003 9:35:10 AM PST by Poohbah (When you're not looking, this tag line says something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson