The “attain goals” wording kind of needs a little explanation before I could go along with it. For instance is a police officer turning on his red lights to pull over someone the officer believes is drunk driving a use of force, and if so is the officer using force that would be a use of force in the defense of rights or to attain a goal?
If this is not a use of force would the impounding vehicle be a use of force to attain the goal of depriving a drunk driving his vehicle?
My problem is I see most all use of force must have a goal so where are your perimeters?
Political goals.
For instance is a police officer turning on his red lights to pull over someone the officer believes is drunk driving a use of force, and if so is the officer using force that would be a use of force in the defense of rights or to attain a goal?
Defense of rights is the only legitimate use of government force. The goal is to defend rights. Government exists to defend rights.
My problem is I see most all use of force must have a goal so where are your perimeters?
Force is legitimate in defense of rights, not to make others do what you want them to do.