[philman_36]

In any civilized society with a functioning commonwealth, property owners must sacrifice certain rights. This is common Lockean principle here.
What if a person owns no property? What rights must be "sacrificed" then? Where does your logic take you in that instance?

[Texaggie79]

None, because that person hasn't any property rights to sacrifice. That person is living on other's properties and must obey the law of those properties anyway.