Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
None, because that person hasn't any property rights to sacrifice. That person is living on other's properties and must obey the law of those properties anyway.
285 posted on 01/16/2003 8:37:24 AM PST by Texaggie79 (seriously joking or jokingly serious, you decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]


To: Texaggie79
You originally said...In any civilized society with a functioning commonwealth, property owners must sacrifice certain rights.
I see you clarified your thoughts...
None, because that person hasn't any property rights to sacrifice.
...and you completely avoid the issue altogether.
Good job!

hmm... perhaps the same reasons they didn't protect witchcraft in their own state. They saw it as a direct threat, and therefore a violation of other's rights.
Perhaps? What a hoot!
Yep, yesteryears Salem Witchcraft trials have rolled over into today's drug laws.
Those little girls wound up being found out as petty little tyrants, jealous of others and guilty before all of bearing false witness.
Which is the more direct threat?

336 posted on 01/16/2003 3:56:26 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson