Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brazil should have nuclear arms, says top minister
Straits Times ^

Posted on 01/10/2003 7:10:25 PM PST by DeaconBenjamin

The comment triggers alarm although the new left-wing government says he was not expressing official policy

RIO DE JANEIRO - A senior official in the left-wing government that took power last week triggered alarm by arguing that Brazil should acquire the capacity to produce a nuclear weapon.

'Brazil is a country at peace, that has always preserved peace and is a defender of peace, but we need to be prepared, including technologically,' said Mr Roberto Amaral, the newly appointed Minister of Science and Technology in an interview with the Brazilian service of the BBC that was broadcast on Sunday night.

'We can't renounce any form of scientific knowledge, whether the genome, DNA or nuclear fission.'

His remarks, coming as the United States faces a nuclear crisis with North Korea and is preparing for war with Iraq over its weapons programmes, has reawakened debate over Brazil's own nuclear energy and research programme, the most advanced in Latin America.

On Tuesday, a spokesman for President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva was quick to distance the new president from Mr Amaral's pronouncement that 'mastery of the atomic cycle is important' to Brazil, saying that his remarks were not an expression of official policy.

'The government favours research in this area, solely and exclusively for peaceful purposes,' Mr Andre Singer told reporters in Brasilia.

Mr Luiz Pinguelli Rosa, Brazil's most prominent nuclear physicist and the newly appointed head of the state electrical power utility Eletrobras, said on Wednesday: 'Brazil does not have, does not need and should not obtain the knowledge of this technology. The bomb is a plague of mankind.'

But Mr Amaral's declarations echoed a certain discontent expressed by Mr da Silva as a candidate last year.

In a speech here in September, he criticised the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty as unjustly favouring the United States and other nations that already had nuclear weapons, asking: 'If someone asks me to disarm and keep a slingshot while he comes at me with a cannon, what good does that do?'

Those remarks were made to a group of retired military officers, many of whom supported the ambitious nuclear programme undertaken by the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from 1964 to 1985 and caused immediate alarm here.

The environmental organisation Greenpeace, for example, criticised Mr da Silva's position, as did groups of scientists here and abroad and even members of his own Workers' Party.

The Brazilian Constitution, promulgated in 1988, forbids the development of nuclear weapons and their presence here.--New York Times


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: latinamericalist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Turk2
Brazil needs to be concerned about the billions in loans they annually default on. Balance your checkbook before you alter the balance of power.
21 posted on 01/10/2003 7:52:56 PM PST by ffusco (siempre raggione)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
All leftists are against nuclear weapons up till the point they take power.
22 posted on 01/10/2003 8:00:33 PM PST by Bogey78O (It's not a Zero it's an "O")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Worse than that.

And yet a missle defense system sounds silly to those on the left. Heh.

23 posted on 01/10/2003 8:15:27 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Why the worry? As the freeper Wilsonians constantly assure us, in contrast to those naive hole-in the sand "American firsters," the U.S. is a mighty superpower which can control events in the world as long as it is willing to assert its power.

The solution is really quite simple, invasion and regime change in Brazil. It will only take a few U.S. troops. They will be greeted by throngs of grateful Brazilians as liberators and heralds of a "Democratic Brazil." If all else fails, Rumsfeld (in contrast that peacenick appeaser Colin Powell...boo hiss) has assured us that we can easily fight three....er two...wars at one time. We can allow a place in our own backyard to have WMD, after all. <P Let's teach those rain-forest jockies as lesson! Lock and Load and if necessary make Brazil glow!

24 posted on 01/10/2003 8:18:54 PM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
China's getting a real kick out of North Korea's antics.

I'm speculating that the prevailing winds out of China across the peninsula towards Japan?

25 posted on 01/10/2003 8:40:33 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rintense
A missile defense makes sense. We would have much earlier if we stopped wasting money on futile and utopian world policing.
26 posted on 01/10/2003 8:43:07 PM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Well everyone knows that many of these third world countries receive an incredible amount of aid from us, and yet they still hate us. Imagine what hate and envy could do for someone with nukes...
27 posted on 01/10/2003 8:48:46 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
"Holy crap .... this is like a bad Clancy novel."

No s#it! I'm starting to miss the cold-war days.

28 posted on 01/10/2003 8:52:22 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
"What's that end times date on the Mayan calendar? December 2012?"

Not to worry

Professor Says Mayan Calendar Does Not Portend Earth's Doom (2012AD)

29 posted on 01/10/2003 8:58:07 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Where's Tom Lehrer when you need him?

First we got the bomb, and that was good,
'Cause we love peace and motherhood.
Then Russia got the bomb, but that's okay,
'Cause the balance of power's maintained that way.
Who's next?

France got the bomb, but don't you grieve,
'Cause they're on our side (I believe).
China got the bomb, but have no fears,
They can't wipe us out for at least five years.
Who's next?

Then Indonesia claimed that they
Were gonna get one any day.
South Africa wants two, that's right:
One for the black and one for the white.
Who's next?

Egypt's gonna get one too,
Just to use on you know who.
So Israel's getting tense.
Wants one in self defense.
"The Lord's our shepherd," says the psalm,
But just in case, we better get a bomb.
Who's next?

Luxembourg is next to go,
And (who knows?) maybe Monaco.
We'll try to stay serene and calm
When Alabama gets the bomb.
Who's next?
Who's next?
Who's next?
Who's next?

30 posted on 01/10/2003 9:03:27 PM PST by P8riot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gcochran
If everybody gets nukes who are we going to have left to stomp? We need to stomp our enemies that have or may have nukes too.
31 posted on 01/10/2003 10:09:32 PM PST by Ruger1099
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"I'm becoming increasingly concerned about Brazil...and Cuba...especially as they relate to certain Venezuelan commie leaders these days....."

This kind of "problem solving" could be alleviated by the new 'assassination-is-now-legal-again' law signed by Dubya, in conjunction with the new flexible rules for engagement by U.S. Special Ops forces.

There are far too many loose canons tooting their tin-horns these days...

32 posted on 01/10/2003 10:31:24 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
When Clinton went rogue on Yugoslavia and put an end to the international system in caused in the perception among the second and third world that no one was safe---unless they have a deterrence. See North Korea and Iraq and their treatments. I say this to point out how Clinton's small war over Kosovo had gigantic and dangerous repercussions.
33 posted on 01/10/2003 10:37:43 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gcochran
We're not stomping North Korea because of China, Japan and South Korea.

South Korea wants unity with the North, China doesn't want millions of Korean refugees flooding over the border, and Japan doesn't want all that radioactive fallout drifting its way across the Sea of Japan.

34 posted on 01/10/2003 10:37:50 PM PST by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: DeaconBenjamin
Sorry but truth is truth...who made this bed? The US made these weapons...we are now REAPING what? Sad but true...of coure these countries want nukes. Why wouldn't they.
36 posted on 01/10/2003 10:45:23 PM PST by Lucas1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Blame it on Rio....
37 posted on 01/10/2003 10:54:31 PM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Some senator, I can't remember which one, has been urging Bush to treat Brazil, Venezuela and Colombia as another "axis of evil". I wouldn't feel too good about that if I just got elected president of Brazil.
38 posted on 01/10/2003 11:07:21 PM PST by halfdome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Destro; dennisw
See North Korea and Iraq and their treatments.

By this I mean we are not afriad to talk badly, threaten and go to war with Iraq and we behave in mark contrast to a nuclear North Korea.

39 posted on 01/10/2003 11:29:25 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: halfdome
Wouldn't that be the Axis of Carnevil?
40 posted on 01/10/2003 11:40:12 PM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson