FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
Posted on 01/10/2003 10:58:50 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
Deanna Streets worked for 23 years, but in 1989 the single mom quit her job at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base to raise the son of her teen-age daughter, who had cerebral palsy.
She needed help making ends meet and went on welfare in 1990, eventually taking in another grandson. Once welfare reform was approved, Streets accepted a work assignment that combined training and working as a receptionist at a local social service organization.
Streets, now 55, is grateful for the job training she received and said it led her to a good job as a typist with the city of Dayton.
"They give you food, they give you medical. You just can't beat it," Streets said of the welfare system. But, she said, "You've got to work for something. Nothing in life is free. If you get off your butt and do something positive you feel better. It worked for me."
Not long ago, "welfare mothers" were political pariahs. These women and their families were a favorite target of politicians and scorned in the public arena. At worst, they were portrayed as lazy and manipulative; at best, they were victims of a system that both liberals and conservatives said trapped them in a life of poverty and dependence.
In 1996, a Republican Congress and Democratic President Bill Clinton fulfilled a promise to "change welfare as we know it," enacting the landmark Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act.
The law dramatically revamped a welfare system that began in the Roosevelt Administration as a program for widows and evolved into a seemingly never-ending source of welfare checks for poor people.
Under the revamped system, states get federal grants — called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families — and are responsible for offering the poor cash assistance and work supports, such as child care and transportation subsidies. Thanks to the change that made childless people ineligible for cash assistance, 70 percent of welfare households are now single women with children.
Furnas, the Springfield-Burkhardt Neighborhood Association president, sees the strain in her east Dayton neighborhood, particularly in the wake of the recession.
"I get calls that they're losing their house, their utilities are shut off, they don't have any medical insurance so they can't go to the doctor," she said. "(Welfare reform) just created a larger number of working poor."
States like Ohio, in the face of a weakened economy and a strapped state budget, sliced resources for some anti-poverty programs. The cuts cost Montgomery County $1.6 million, forcing reductions in programs that help people finish job training or find and keep jobs.
The economic downturn has also battered state budgets and cut into the funding for many of the programs that made welfare reform successful. Cuyahoga County sued the state of Ohio after the legislature last fall used federal welfare money to help cover the state's $1.5 billion budget deficit.
http://www.activedayton.com/ddn/project/welfare/0616welfare.html
I am shocked, SHOCKED!
Adam Smith must be spinning in his grave! To imagine that there would be a big demand for free stuff!
;-)
My sister used to go to the food bank even though both she and her husband were working, and they both made good money.
Plenty of retired ones.
How many unemployed people pay income tax or capital gains tax or dividend tax?
Ms. Escobar has taken the president's policies somewhat personally. "I'm a Republican and I'm not ashamed to say it," she said. "But I'm very upset that they have done nothing for us."
I asked if she had voted for Mr. Bush. "I sure did," she said, then added, "I feel very betrayed."
For those who don't know, Marietta and the SE Ohio region is in Appalachia. It is and most likely will be an economically-distressed area, even in 'good times' for the rest of the country. They did not pick a representative area, but instead went to a region that will always have its share of poverty and working poor.
BTW, this area of the country did have some decent-paying jobs at one time, in the coal-mining business. The coal in this region is high in sulfur content. The environmentalists succeeded over the years in tightening SO4 emissions from coal-burning power plants, thereby reducing demand for this kind of coal. The result? Mines closed. Unemployment and poverty went up. So what this story doesn't tell you is that a significant amount of the poverty in the region is the fault of environmentalist wackos.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.