Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PRESIDENT BUSH SIGNS WETLANDS ACT
The Democrat.com ^ | January 07, 2003 | James L. Cummins

Posted on 01/09/2003 7:03:56 PM PST by Uncle Bill

President Bush signs Wetlands Act

The Democrat.com
By James L. Cummins
January 7, 2002

President George W. Bush recently signed into law the reauthorization of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act. It's purpose is to encourage voluntary partnerships among public agencies and the private sector to conserve North American wetland ecosystems. It establishes an infrastructure and provides a source of funding to accomplish that end. The Act funds the protection, restoration, management and enhancement of a wetland ecosystem to benefit wetland-dependent wildlife.

According to President Bush, "Today we take important action to conserve North America's wetlands, which will help keep our water clean and help provide habitat for hundreds of species of wildlife. Through this legislation, the federal government will continue its partnership with landowners, conservation groups and states to save and improve millions of acres of wetlands. The North American Wetlands Conservation Reauthorization Act shows our concern for the environment and our respect for future generations of Americans. "With this signature today, the North American Wetlands Conservation Act will be reauthorized for five years. The law authorizes federal money to match donations from sportsmen, state wildlife agencies, conservationists and landowners. Since 1991, more than $462 million in federal grants have helped to encourage $1.3 billion in contributions from others."

"Together these funds have restored streams and rivers, re-established native plants and trees, acquired land that is home to more than a third of America's threatened and endangered species. Because about 75 percent of the wetlands are held privately, we need to encourage cooperation with our landowners. This legislation shows that when government, landowners and conservationists work together, we can make dramatic progress in preserving the beauty and the quality of our environment." Bush also thanked the Congress for supporting this legislation.

Proposed projects are ranked by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's North American Wetlands Conservation Council. Selected, prioritized proposals are recommended to the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission for consideration of funding. Membership consists of the Secretary of the Interior, who serves as Chairman; the Secretaries of Transportation and Agriculture; two Members of the Senate (one is Senator Thad Cochran); and two Members of the House of Representatives. The Commission is authorized to approve, reject or reorder the priority of the proposed projects.


Bush Administration Keeps Clinton Wetlands Rule

Bush Supports Clinton Land Grab

W. THE ENVIRONMENTALIST - "On almost every environmental issue, Bush has upheld the Clinton-Gore position." - THE NEW REPUBLIC


The Global Warming Sell-Out

The Global Warming Sell-Out

Conservatives Angered By Environmental Provision - "A tax break for environmental groups is being added to part of President Bush's faith-based initiative"

George W. Goes Green - "George W. Bush was not only ratifying Bill Clinton's edicts in last week's run-up to Earth Day. Free market activists who consider themselves allies were told to sit down and shut up about the greening of the new president."

Cooked Climate Numbers - Thomas Sowell

Global lying - Thomas Sowell

Limbaugh excoriates Bush on global warming

George W. Algore (Say's Rush Limbaugh, Political issue for leftists)

LIMBAUGH RIPS BUSH WHITE HOUSE OVER GLOBAL WARMING 'FLIP-FLOP'

Rush: Fleischer Flips Back, White House Realigns With EPA Warning Report

Is he now Global Warming Bush? - Cal Thomas

Say It Ain't So, George

Is Bush Green?

Is Bush Green?

W. THE ENVIRONMENTALIST - "On almost every environmental issue, Bush has upheld the Clinton-Gore position." - THE NEW REPUBLIC

Bush is as Green as Gore!

Bush Turns Green

Bush Turns Green

"President Bush anted up $235 million in federal funds Wednesday to shelter Florida's Everglades and beaches from oil and gas drilling"

White House defends U-turn on global warming

U-TURN: BUSH ADMIN OUTLINES 'GLOBAL WARMING' EFFECTS ON AMERICA; ACKNOWLEDGES DAMAGE

BUSH DISMISSES OWN ADMINISTRATION REPORT ON 'WARMING'

Bush Administration Blames Humans for Global Warming

GLOBAL WARMING = U.N. SUCK-UP

""Christie Whitman, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency chief, said Saturday that the United States supports the goal of Kyoto but was reviewing its strategy for achieving it."


Press Briefing - June 5, 2002
"Q Ari, if I could change subjects for a second. This morning you said that the President quoted a speech, indicating that the President believes that human activity is largely responsible for the increase in greenhouse gases. But I'm wondering if he also agrees with an EPA report which indicated that human activity is likely the cause of global warming?

MR. FLEISCHER: Let me just read from the President's statement of June 11th on global warming, and let me read from the recent report the EPA submitted to the United Nations. And I think you'll hear that on the key issues, they really sound very, very similar. This is the President on June 11th in the Rose Garden, in a speech where he announced his global warming policies.

"Concentration of greenhouse gases, especially C02, have increased substantially since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. And the National Academy of Sciences indicate that the increase is due in large part to human activity." That's the President himself speaking.

Here is from the report, page 4, that was just submitted to the United States by the EPA: "Greenhouse gases are accumulating in Earth's atmosphere as the result of human activities, causing global mean surface temperature and subsurface ocean temperature to rise. While the changes observed over the last several decades are due most likely to human activities, we cannot rule out that some significant part is also a reflection of natural variability." And I think what you're hearing is the same thing.

Q I'm glad you make the connection explicitly, since the President addressed greenhouse gases, but not specifically global warming. Does the President agree with the conclusion that human activity is likely the cause of global warming?

MR. FLEISCHER: That's what the President said in his speech in June.

Q That's not exactly what he said. He does agree with it?

MR. FLEISCHER: When the President cites the National Academy of Science as saying that the National Academy of Science indicates that the increase is due in large part to human activity, I don't know how the President could say it more specifically than that.

Q He hasn't changed his mind at all?

MR. FLEISCHER: No. Here's -- the bottom line for the President is, number one, he has made a proposal that he believes is a proposal that not only can reduce the problem of greenhouse gases and global warming, but also protects the American economy, so the American economy can lead the world in technological and scientific advances that also have an effect in reducing pollution.

The President has said, citing the National Academy of Sciences, that the increase is due in large part to human activity. The President has also continued, citing both, now this report the EPA has sent to the United Nations, previous evidence from the National Academy of Sciences, that there's uncertainty -- and the recent report notes that there is considerable uncertainty. That's the state of science, and the President agrees with it. I don't think people dispute that.

Q Its uncertainty, but he can still draw that conclusion, that --

MR. FLEISCHER: He didn't June 11th.

Q He didn't exactly do it, but you're saying it now.

MR. FLEISCHER: Again, when the President cites a report by the National Academy of Sciences that indicates the increase is due in large part to human activity, I think you have two reports that are very similar.

Q Why was he --

Q Why did he call it the bureaucracy yesterday?

MR. FLEISCHER: I think the EPA issued a report that says the same thing. And I think the President was also reflecting about some of the way it was covered, that made it sound as if the report was somehow inconsistent with what he had said previously.

Q I don't think he reflected at all, he just said that, I saw it put out by a bureaucracy. What did he reflect on?

MR. FLEISCHER: I'm sharing with you his insights."
Ari Fleischer Sound Bite


Bush Warms To Climate

The Washington Times
By Greg Pierce
May 21, 1999
Source

Texas Gov. George W. Bush has changed his tune on a key environmental issue, saying he no longer believes there's any question that the globe is warming, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports.

"I believe there is global warming," he said at a news conference last week. Mr. Bush had said just a few weeks ago that the "science is still out" on global warming. The governor, who is leading a crowded field of GOP presidential candidates, said his team of advisers had changed his mind.

"The last time I wasn't certain of the science," he said. "I've had some briefings recently and I'm becoming more convinced that the science proves there's global warming."

Tom "Smitty" Smith, director of the liberal consumer and environmental group Public Citizen, welcomed the new position.

"We are delighted that Gov. Bush is acknowledging that global warming is a problem," he said. "We would ask him to take a leadership role since Texas leads the nation in global warming."

But Texas Citizens for a Sound Economy, a conservative group that doubts global-warming theories, says Mr. Bush should take another look.

"We think there's been a lot of questionable and bad science that's been used," said the group's spokeswoman, Peggy Venable.
[End of Transcript]

More Than 15,000 Scientists Speak Out Against Global Warming Myth


Bush decisions rankle conservatives

"And now, a Republican administration will continue and complete the work of a Democratic administration. This is the way environmental policy should work."
George W. Bush - SOURCE


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: communism; copernicus3; enviralists; environment; tediouslyredundant; wetlands
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-470 next last
To: Fred Mertz
What do you know about powers?

I have "powers" far beyond those of mortal men.

161 posted on 01/09/2003 9:17:22 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
Two things...

Alligator Alley is in Broward, not Dade.

And this is why it is important that control of issues like these be turned over to the States. So people can vote Senators out.
162 posted on 01/09/2003 9:17:22 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
.
163 posted on 01/09/2003 9:17:35 PM PST by Howlin (I'll have my scrambled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Bush's legislative record is depressing. This year he signed laws supporting minority contracting set-asides; directing electric utilities to develop diversit y and set-aside plans; and creating race-tar geted, scholarship-matching programs run by the state higher education coordinating board. Apparently, this principle is too politically controversial for GOP presidential front-runner George W. Bush to embrace publicly and unequivocally -- and too complicated for GOP law-enforcement officials in Bush's home state of Texas to defend.

Although Bush claims to oppose racial quotas and preferences, he refuses to take a position on two landmark ballot measures that outlawed racial preferences by popular vote: California's Prop. 209 and Washington state's Initiative 200. More disturbing was Bush's failure to take a position on Prop. A, the 1997 Houston Civil Rights Initiative, which would have outlawed racial preferences in contracting by Houston city government.

If Bush cannot bring himself to support ballot initiatives that abolish government preferences, then his stated opposition to preferences is thin gruel.

Michelle Malkin




164 posted on 01/09/2003 9:17:38 PM PST by TLBSHOW (Keeping the Republicans Feet to the fire is a 24/7 job for conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
He should definitely stay away from fisheye lens......LOL.
165 posted on 01/09/2003 9:18:34 PM PST by Howlin (I'll have my scrambled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
ask Jeb Bush about it (EO)
166 posted on 01/09/2003 9:18:47 PM PST by TLBSHOW (Keeping the Republicans Feet to the fire is a 24/7 job for conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
So, the terrible consequences you have experienced since Reagan began this policy boils down to 5 people not being able to get permits to build something?

5 major clients with alot to lose and countless smaller clients. You need to expand the scope of your thinking here, Luis. Not all "wetlands" look like the everglades. When you realize that you will understand how the governemnt greatly abuses their power when it comes to "wetlands" protection.

167 posted on 01/09/2003 9:19:23 PM PST by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Bush's legislative record is depressing. This year he signed laws supporting minority contracting set-asides; directing electric utilities to develop diversit y and set-aside plans; and creating race-tar geted

Which legislation is that? Any links?

168 posted on 01/09/2003 9:19:43 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
I agree.

But my rants do NOT label President Bush as a liberal republican pushing a commie agenda...nor do I resort to calling him a socialist.

I am a conservative...and I do applaud some actions and seriously wonder about others. But that does excuse the rabid name calling and "all or nothing" nasty gutter-mouthing that some on this thread continue to indulge in towards President Bush.

It goes beyond the pale, imo. You can question the 'actions' but it is not necessary to engage in total character assassination. And that is what I am seeing here.
169 posted on 01/09/2003 9:20:01 PM PST by justshe (God Bless the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
** Todd is this true? **

YEP it's true ...

here is a sample of my run in

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/819681/posts?page=47#47

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/819681/posts?page=53#53

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/819681/posts?page=55#55


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/819681/posts?page=59#59
170 posted on 01/09/2003 9:21:32 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the DC Chapter at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Opps .. sorry .. forgot to ping you to post #170
171 posted on 01/09/2003 9:22:29 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the DC Chapter at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Those are some serious knobby knees on Ann.

And what's with the vinyl outfit anyway?

172 posted on 01/09/2003 9:22:52 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Although Bush claims to oppose racial quotas and preferences, he refuses to take a position on two landmark ballot measures that outlawed racial preferences by popular vote:

So you are advocating direct democracy in the form of "ballot initiatives"? What happens when a ballot initiative to ban all guns is passed?

173 posted on 01/09/2003 9:22:57 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: dorben
Looks like you are getting what you want as are millions of other voters . I still do not see what is good for the republic in the long or short term .

Care to explain?

174 posted on 01/09/2003 9:25:13 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #175 Removed by Moderator

To: Texasforever

What's wrong with ballot initiaves?

176 posted on 01/09/2003 9:26:17 PM PST by Jhoffa_ (LOTR out takes, Reel #1 Sammy: Oh! Kiss me Frodo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Dunno about that, but I saw Laura Ingraham tonight on some show and I was thinking about the difference in those two.

Laura is so steady and authoritative. Not at all shrill like Coulter is.

177 posted on 01/09/2003 9:26:26 PM PST by Howlin (I'll have my scrambled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
All I know is that Ann needs to back off the caffeine...or whatever.
178 posted on 01/09/2003 9:27:31 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; farmfriend
"The Feds have done good for the Pacific Flyway IMHO"

Did you post this vacuous reply from UC Davis, next to the Vic Fazio wildlife preserve that used to be known as the Yolo Causeway? You have absolutely GOT to be KIDDING!!!

If you're not, are you gonna be happy that the rice farmers selling their standing, mosquito breeding, West Nile Virus spreading water to Southern CA and drying up your "flyways?"

Also, when will you be satisfied that we have restored enough "wetlands"/"swamps," or cleaned enough air and water that we can stop blowing off billions into this endless fiscal black hole?

Enough of this crapola, already!!!

179 posted on 01/09/2003 9:27:36 PM PST by SierraWasp (says: CA IS BEING GOVERNED BY A <b>GRAND LARCENIST!!!</b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
What happens when a ballot initiative to ban all guns is passed?

He'll be back to you with an answer as soon as he searches the interent and finds something to cut and paste to ya!

I'm still waiting for the answer to several questions to him.

{Insert Jeopardy theme music here}

180 posted on 01/09/2003 9:28:23 PM PST by Howlin (I'll have my scrambled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-470 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson