Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blix Says Iraq Violated U.N. Sanctions
ABC News ^ | 1/9/03

Posted on 01/09/2003 12:04:54 PM PST by areafiftyone

U.N. weapons inspectors said Thursday they have not found any "smoking guns" but have discovered that Iraq violated U.N. sanctions by importing parts for its missile program.

Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, complained that his inspectors haven't been able to conduct private interviews with Iraqi scientists who may have knowledge of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs.

"We are not able to have interviews in Iraq in private and that does not show the proactive cooperation we seek," ElBaradei said after briefing the U.N. Security Council on the progress of inspections and assessments of Iraq's 12,000-page weapons declaration.

Chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix told the council that Iraq has not made a "serious effort" to respond to his request for the names of Iraqi scientists who were involved in weapons of mass destruction programs. But both men stressed that the inspections process needs more time.

"The absence of a smoking gun and the prompt access which we have had so far, and which is most welcome, is no guarantee that prohibited stocks or activities could not exist at other sites, whether above ground, underground or in mobile units," Blix told the council.

U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte called on Iraq to admit to weapons programs "it maintains, even today."

"Anything less is not cooperation and will constitute further material breach," Negroponte said, using diplomatic language that could pave the way for war.

In Baghdad, Gen. Hossam Mohammed Amin, the chief Iraqi liaison officer to the inspection teams, said that a U.N. inspector had raised the possibility without making a formal request of taking Iraqi scientists to Cyprus for questioning. He said scientists could decide for themselves whether to go but that they were expected to refuse.

Blix told reporters earlier that he hadn't heard of such a request but planned to conduct interviews in the near future. Negroponte said the United States expected inspectors to "to begin out-of-country interviews."

"The burden remains on Iraq to demonstrate compliance," Negroponte said, adding that inspectors are there to "verify Iraqi disarmament, not to serve as detectives working to overcome elaborate concealment mechanisms."

During Blix's briefing to the Security Council, he said Iraq had admitted in its weapons declaration to importing missile engines and raw material for the production of solid missile fuel. "This import has taken place in violation of the relevant resolutions regulating import and export to Iraq."

ElBaradei said inspectors were investigating what happened to 32 tons of HMX high explosive that Iraq says was turned into industrial explosive but which can also be used to detonate nuclear weapons.

The inspectors are to give a formal report on Iraq's compliance on Jan. 27. British Prime Minister Tony Blair said that date should not be seen as a deadline for conflict.

"We are in the middle of a process. The U.N. inspectors have just, at the beginning of the year, got their full complement of inspectors there," Blair told government ministers in London on Thursday, according to his spokesman.

The United States, backed by Britain, has threatened military action against Iraq if it does not comply with U.N. demands and rid itself of programs for chemical, biological and nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. But Blix stressed that the U.N. resolution does not put a time limit on inspections.

He noted that Iraq's weapons declaration confirmed his initial impression that the dossier was incomplete. "We think that the declaration failed to answer a great many questions," he told reporters.

He said Iraq had not replied to his requests for the answers made since the declaration. "Iraq may have more to say. I hope so," he said.

In Baghdad, Amin denied inspectors had submitted any questions and said Iraq had shown that it no longer has any weapons of mass destruction.

For much of the Security Council, the issues of Iraqi cooperation with inspectors and evidence of clandestine Iraqi weapons programs are considered crucial to support for any military action.

"We have now been there for some two months and been covering the country in ever wider sweeps and we haven't found any smoking guns," Blix said.

Asked whether inspectors were getting significant intelligence from the United States, Blix said: "Well, we are getting intelligence from several sources and I will not go into the operative part of that, but it's clear that this will be helpful in the future to us."

"We have gone to, I think, about 125 sites already, and some of them were not visited before, and there will be more. And as more intelligence comes in, there will be more sites visited. I'm confident that we will get more intelligence."

Blix has said previously that his inspectors need intelligence from other nations because Iraq's weapons declaration leaves so many unanswered questions that it's impossible to verify its claim of having no weapons of mass destruction.

Secretary of State Colin Powell told The Washington Post for Thursday's editions that in the past few days, the United States has begun giving inspectors "significant intelligence" that has enabled them to become "more aggressive and to be more comprehensive in the work they're doing."

But Washington is holding back some information to see if inspectors "are able to handle it and exploit it. ... It is not a matter of opening up every door we have," Powell said.

French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin said his government wants the council to comply with Resolution 1441, adopted Nov. 8, which asks all countries to provide information on Iraq's "prohibited programs" and recommend sites to be visited and Iraqis to be interviewed.

The United States has promised to share information with inspectors, as long as U.S. intelligence sources aren't compromised. "We have and will continue to provide information to the inspectors," a U.S. official said Wednesday, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Britain opened a channel weeks ago to provide the inspectors with information and "they are getting all that we can usefully give," a British official said Wednesday, speaking on condition of anonymity.

French President Jacques Chirac, two days after telling his armed forces to be ready "for all eventualities," said Thursday he hoped the Iraq crisis would be resolved peacefully and reiterated that military action must be a last resort.

Chirac said the government will work alongside the United Nations to make Saddam comply with his U.N. disarmament obligations and that France would continue to push for a diplomatic solution.




TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: areafiftyone
The UN inspectors are a classic case of the bilx leading the blix.

President Bush has the goods and he has showed some of it to Chiraq, otherwise Jacky Chiraqi wouldn't be preparing the French for what's about to happen.

41 posted on 01/09/2003 1:54:14 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Oh my god....Shep Smith just used a Freeper term......sheeple.

That's a survivalist's term actually ... been around a lot longer than FR has.

42 posted on 01/09/2003 2:05:07 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Islam and Arabs = uncivilized barbarians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ottersnot
That MIGHT have been the movie SIGNS with Mel Gibson.
43 posted on 01/09/2003 2:06:44 PM PST by JimFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Do YOU know who's exporting the missile materials to Iraq?
44 posted on 01/09/2003 2:07:35 PM PST by Amelia ((What's all this parentheses stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
U.N. weapons inspectors said Thursday they have not found any "smoking guns" but have discovered that Iraq violated U.N. sanctions by importing parts for its missile program.

Either this is more of the liberal anti-Bush propaganda, or the press is really, really dumb. Maybe both.
Have they no idea what's going on?
It doesn't matter if there's a smoking gun. We know Saddam has WMD because he's used them - twice! Under the terms of surrender, he was to destroy them.
We're looking for evidence. So far, there's no proof, evidence, paperwork, that says he did as the agreement stated.
Until SADDAM PROVES he has no weapons, we're right to replace him. Period!

45 posted on 01/09/2003 2:08:24 PM PST by concerned about politics (Achievement is politically incorrect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Russia, Germany, North Korea or China.

Choose one from column A and one from column B.

46 posted on 01/09/2003 2:15:02 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
http://usinfo.state.gov/cgi-bin/washfile/display.pl?p=/products/washfile/latest&f=03010801.plt&t=/products/washfile/newsitem.shtml
47 posted on 01/09/2003 2:16:28 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Blix Says Iraq Violated U.N. Sanctions

Sharpen your swords and battle axes, string your bows and fletch your arrows for it is......
...TIME TO KILL THE ORCS!!!!
48 posted on 01/09/2003 2:23:01 PM PST by Copperhead61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Thanks! Some good suggestions there, but it doesn't precisely say who is sending material to Iraq.

I'm thinking if it comes out publicly that members of the Security Council were violating U.N. sanctions on selling such material to Iraq.....
49 posted on 01/09/2003 2:27:14 PM PST by Amelia ((What's all this parentheses stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dog
DO NOT REMOVE THIS TAG UNDER PENALTY OF LAW

Best tag line I have seen yet..

---

Support YOUR Houston FReeper Chapter!

---

Flyer

50 posted on 01/09/2003 2:27:34 PM PST by Flyer (Somewhere there is a tag line searching for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
How about this one......
51 posted on 01/09/2003 2:28:36 PM PST by Dog (Happy Birthday Bob Denver(Gilligan)!!!!!!! Just a three hour tour....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; justshe; Miss Marple; deport; section9; Dog; wimpycat; concerned about politics; MadIvan
During Blix's briefing to the Security Council, he said Iraq had admitted in its weapons declaration to importing missile engines and raw material for the production of solid missile fuel. "This import has taken place in violation of the relevant resolutions regulating import and export to Iraq."

So how do we find out who is exporting missile parts to Iraq?

Would there also be U.N. sanctions against the exporters? Blix says it's a violation.

What if the country or countries selling this material to Iraq are members of the U.N. Security Council? What if it's North Korea?

52 posted on 01/09/2003 2:29:54 PM PST by Amelia ((What's all this parentheses stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dog
How about this one......Happy Birthday Bob Denver(Gilligan)

If you happen to know my dog's name is Gilligan and I used to have that as my screen name it becomes quite significant.

53 posted on 01/09/2003 2:33:13 PM PST by Flyer (Somewhere there is a tag line searching for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
"...he said Iraq had admitted in its weapons declaration to importing missile engines and raw material for the production of solid missile fuel. "This import has taken place in violation of the relevant resolutions regulating import and export to Iraq."

I can't believe that AP will stand by this quote as it seems to be the only organization out there who is reporting Blix's comment. I'm sure an error will be acknowledged and a retraction made.

I talked to friend earlier who said the only thing she had heard was coming from ABC News and ABC radio...and THEY are reporting that no WMD..or component parts have been found, says Blix to Security Council.

AP will retract is my guess.

54 posted on 01/09/2003 2:38:23 PM PST by justshe (GWB.....Frist....Hastert: The Perfect Trifecta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Amelia

Sorted by relevance Sort by date


Leaked details confirm German presence
Financial Times (subscription), UK - 17 Dec 2002
... could be used in an illegal missile programme ... Legally registered German exports to
Iraq ... More than 100 German companies were registered to take part ...


You may find your answer here but I'm not interested in subscribing. Sorry. ;-}
55 posted on 01/09/2003 2:43:30 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Fox News is reporting the same thing:

U.N. Chief Weapons Inspector Hans Blix said Iraq had violated U.N. sanctions by importing missile engines and raw material for the production of solid missile fuel.

Again I say, if Iraq is in violation for IMPORTING this stuff, someone else is in violation for EXPORTING IT TO IRAQ. Question is, who?

56 posted on 01/09/2003 2:46:12 PM PST by Amelia ((What's all this parentheses stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
ROFLOL...how different THIS article is from the Reuters article. That one only mentioned the "no smoking gun" part.
57 posted on 01/09/2003 2:52:37 PM PST by cake_crumb (STILL stupid propagandists anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Germany & North Korea are not members of the Security Council, but China & Russia are...

It seems to me that some reporter would have asked the question. Do you suppose it didn't occur to any of them?
58 posted on 01/09/2003 2:54:07 PM PST by Amelia (Who's sending missile parts to Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"...and was shocked to hear Blix's actual remarks. Nothing close to what the anchors were saying!"

Nope. You'd think they were really desperate to keep us out of Iraq, wouldn't you?

59 posted on 01/09/2003 2:58:05 PM PST by cake_crumb (STILL stupid propagandists anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Good deal that FNC is reporting the same, Amelia.

As to the WHO of the 'imports'......good question. Wouldn't they fall in the 'either you are with us or you are against us' category?
60 posted on 01/09/2003 2:59:29 PM PST by justshe (GWB.....Frist....Hastert: The Perfect Trifecta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson