Skip to comments.
Mark Steyn: Can America be serious?
The Spectator (U.K.) ^
| 01/11/03
| Mark Steyn
Posted on 01/09/2003 9:07:42 AM PST by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
1
posted on
01/09/2003 9:07:42 AM PST
by
Pokey78
To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...
2
posted on
01/09/2003 9:09:09 AM PST
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Why aren't people screaming for Bush to go to the UN about North Korea? Then, after 10 years of no compliance, we could do something about it.
3
posted on
01/09/2003 9:12:12 AM PST
by
Howlin
(I cannot stop playing Collapse II -- HELP ME!)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: scholar; Bullish
Ping
To: Howlin
I've used up the trial version of Collapse II. If I buy it, I'd never stop. hehe
6
posted on
01/09/2003 9:28:43 AM PST
by
Pokey78
To: Joseph_CutlerUSA
How can he claim that the war against Saddam is on "the back burner". A massive build up in underway. France just said they will join the battle. Seems war, on our time table, is inevitable.
7
posted on
01/09/2003 9:29:08 AM PST
by
DManA
To: Pokey78
M.S. bump.
8
posted on
01/09/2003 9:34:15 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: Pokey78
Let's see if I understand this - KJI of DPRK theatens war if we don't give him a non-aggression pact... The USA says that DPRK should abide by the treaties it has signed.
Should I hold my breath until Babs, Asner, Baldwin and the other peacekooks march off to Pyongyang to beg KJI for peace?
Nah - they'll complain about the USA threatening DPRK with all those modern weapons at the DMZ.
9
posted on
01/09/2003 9:37:50 AM PST
by
RandyRep
To: Pokey78; Howlin
I have enough trouble with the original Collapse. I am not about to download the new version...it will be like when my son got Mario Brothers and my husband and I played until 2AM. LOL!
To: Howlin
But, if theyre that relaxed about nuclear proliferation in their backyard, then, as the Washington Posts Charles Krauthammer suggests, Washington should toss em a wild card: how about a nuclear Japan? Thats a great suggestion. I'll even one up them - how about a nuclear Taiwan? The communists will always connive with one another to enslave free peoples.
11
posted on
01/09/2003 9:48:43 AM PST
by
KC_Conspirator
((I cannot stop playing Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, I need help myself))
To: Pokey78
I'm afraid I can't understand these guys whining about the delay. Read the weather statistics. Nobody in his right mind wants to fight in Iraq any time other than the winter. We'll probably invade just about the same time we did in Gulf War I.
12
posted on
01/09/2003 9:55:24 AM PST
by
Restorer
To: Pokey78
"China . . . recently shipped 20 tons of tributyl phosphate to North Korea for extracting plutonium from their stockpile of spent reactor fuel" If we had folks on the ball in DC, we'd blow up the tributyl phosphate shipment and deny any involvement. I.e., practical nonproliferation policy instead of State Department B.S.
To: KC_Conspirator
Bump
14
posted on
01/09/2003 10:02:28 AM PST
by
MrConfettiMan
(I can't stop playing Metroid Prime or Star Fox Adventures on my GCN.)
To: KC_Conspirator
Exactly. Let's give one to our friends!
as Hashemi Rafsanjani, one of those famous Iranian moderates, has said, the day the Muslim world gets a deliverable nuclear weapon the Israeli question will be settled for ever.
A horrific thought. I wonder what Babs thinks about Israel.
15
posted on
01/09/2003 10:09:10 AM PST
by
Howlin
(I cannot stop playing Collapse II -- HELP ME!)
To: Pokey78
I could not agree more with Steyn's analysis in this piece. As much as I love and respect President Bush, I've got a sinking feeling that there will NOT be any war in Iraq to take out Saddam. The longer Blix, Anan, and the Leftists who infest the UN get to play in their sandbox, the weaker the case for war appears to the general public. By all accounts, the president chose to take Colin Powell's route through the UN. I increasingly fear it may have been a massive mistake. In any event, I sure don't see Powell working very hard to push the UN to do the right thing.
16
posted on
01/09/2003 10:25:32 AM PST
by
Wolfstar
To: Pokey78
Thanks for the post and ping, Pokey! This bears repeating !!
By contrast, North Korea is literally the No Dong state. Take a look at a satellite picture of the peninsula by night: South Korea ablaze in electric light, the North in darkness. In Far East Asia, North Koreas the hole in the doughnut.
17
posted on
01/09/2003 10:31:23 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(http://muffin.eggheads.org/images/funny/dogsmile.jpg)
To: Pokey78
The time to stop Saddam is before he gets nukes.Saddam doesn't need nukes. He already has anthrax, and is therefore quite invulnerable, unfortunately. There is just no getting around that reality.
To: Pokey78
If I read this article aright, we'd better have the CIA keep an eye on the comings and goings of Long Dong Silver.
19
posted on
01/09/2003 10:38:09 AM PST
by
Imal
To: DManA
How can he claim that the war against Saddam is on "the back burner". A massive build up in underway. France just said they will join the battle. Seems war, on our time table, is inevitable.You bring out a couple of good points that Steyn doesn't.
First, much of our military was run down by the klintons, and they've fought tooth-and-nail, through the democRAT party, to prevent it from being rebuilt.
Second, our military industrial capacity has been weakened, again thanks to the RATS. The weaponry that should have been restocked after Gulf War I was instead further depleted by Bill using it to influence the daily news cycle whenever his ass was in legal trouble.
Third, Bill and Hitlery sucked up to terrorists of all kinds, and Bush has had to work hard to convince the world that America is under new management, and countries have to choose between helping, or being listed in the footnotes of the "axis of evil".
The "delay" has been used to fix our weaknesses, and undo some of the damage caused by Bill and Hitlery, who harmed America far more than the raghead terrorists could ever aspire to. My personal prediction is that Gulf War 2 will last less than a week, and will have so much high-tech razzle-dazzle that scenes from Gulf War 1 will look like slogging through the trenches of World War 1.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson