"No, the appearance of something moving is relative.
Reality, however, cares not a whit for appearances. Either something is moving or it isn't, regardless of how it appears in your relative frame of reference."
Because you make this assertion, you also implicitly assert that you know it to be true, i.e. you can tell. I'm asking how. Please share your insight with me, by pointing out how you know that there's an absolute frame of reference. Where's the motionless object that serves as our absolute reference point?
Is merely asking sufficient, or do you require that I get down on my knees and pray?
"Because you make this assertion, you also implicitly assert that you know it to be true, i.e. you can tell [that something isn't moving]." - Oberon
No, by making that assertation, I am pointing out that Reality doesn't care whether we can "tell" or not.