"2. The Sun (as well as the rest of our Solar System) is traveling through space, yes or no?" - Southack "Actually, I disagree with point #2, at least as it relates to the notion of absolute velocity, and so does the "entire scientific community". - Dan Day
Heck, I'd settle for you quoting a SINGLE scientific source as saying that it is in disagreement with point #2 above (hint: you can't).
Hint: You're trolling again. And dodging again.
Several times I've challenged *you* to provide an actual "scientific source" for your various silly declarations. You've dodged every time. Now you to try to divert the issue you challenge *me* to document something that's common knowledge in every physics class, and trollishly taunt that you don't think I can do it.
What motivates you to behave this way? Is acting the fool that gratifying?
Does saying things which are so ridiculous that someone can't help but laugh at you and point out the ludicrousness of your error somehow make you feel better about yourself because you're able to be such an ass, as if that's some sort of worthy accomplishment?
Please tell me why people such as yourself devote so much time to trolling, when there are so many more constructive ways you could spend your time.
But in case any lurkers are curious:
Albert Einstein then proposed, in 1905, the "principle of relativity" as a fundamental property of the universe. No matter what physical process was used, absolute motion at a constant velocity was undetectable. No loophole existed, not even through the laws of electricity and magnetism.
-- Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Center (emphasis in original)
You'd think that NASA would have noticed if, as Southack falsely asserted many times, the Sun's image lagged behind its "absolute motion" in space, since that would not only have affected GSFC's rocket trajectory calculations, it would also have violated the Theory of Relativity and won someone a Nobel prize...
But then, Southack mumbles and *admits* he was wrong (although he's careful not to come out and say it so clearly that anyone might notice unless they were paying close attention), as we'll see in the next post.
"2. The Sun (as well as the rest of our Solar System) is traveling through space, yes or no?" - Southack
"Actually, I disagree with point #2, at least as it relates to the notion of absolute velocity, and so does the "entire scientific community". - Dan Day
Heck, I'd settle for you quoting a SINGLE scientific source as saying that it is in disagreement with point #2 above (hint: you can't). - Southack
"Hint: You're trolling again. And dodging again.
Several times I've challenged *you* to provide an actual "scientific source" for your various silly declarations. You've dodged every time. Now you to try to divert the issue you challenge *me* to document something that's common knowledge in every physics class, and trollishly taunt that you don't think I can do it.
...
But in case any lurkers are curious:
Albert Einstein then proposed, in 1905, the "principle of relativity" as a fundamental property of the universe. No matter what physical process was used, absolute motion at a constant velocity was undetectable. No loophole existed, not even through the laws of electricity and magnetism.
-- Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Center (emphasis in original)"
That's a curious non-response. You've managed to cite a scientific source, but the problem is that scientific source doesn't support your claim or refute point #2 above.
Typical. Gee, do I get to hear more name-calling from you, or are you just going to flee from yet another thread again? I can barely stand the suspense!