Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist
Now you're calling me a lawyer??!! :)
I'm of the school that acceleration is absolute, relative to only one preferred reference frame. Why doesn't SRT apply to accelerated frames? Isn't the entire cosmos a series of accelerated frames, starting on the rotating earth (in a gravitational field no less) revolving around the sun which is part of a revolving cluster of stars and so on. Even the velocity of light is referred to as local, it is not universal.
125 posted on 01/08/2003 5:19:31 PM PST by Gary Boldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Gary Boldwater
I'm of the school that acceleration is absolute, relative to only one preferred reference frame.

Consider one observer at the center of the Earth and another at the surface, in a sealed box. Is the one on the surface accelerating? According to his measurements--remember, he can't see his surroundings, so he measures his acceleration with a scale--he is (c.f. the equivalence principle). According to the observer at the center of the Earth, he is not.

Why doesn't SRT apply to accelerated frames?

I assume you mean an accelerating frame. Frames by construction don't accelerate; they refer to inertial rest. SR does apply to accelerated frames (i.e., frames at different velocities). But what you want to know is, is there a principle of relativity that relates observers under arbitrary acceleration? Yes, it's called the General Theory of Relativity.

127 posted on 01/08/2003 5:30:13 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson