Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Macworld Expo keynote coverage recap (New PowerBooks, New Web Browser!)
MacCentral.com ^ | January 7, 2002 | Peter Cohen

Posted on 01/07/2003 1:51:09 PM PST by Timesink

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last
To: Last Visible Dog
You, my friend, are a liar. I did no such thing. My first comment was related to some Mac-Clown claiming the PC was a liberal computer.

Let's see. Your opening contribution to the "Apple unveils own Web browser" thread was "Apple continues to find new ways to reshuffle their less than 3% of the computer market." Along with a nifty little bit of code to "predict Apple's approximate world wide share of the personal computer."

Your first comment on the "Apple Introduces New Products" thread was designed to impugned the personal experience and opinion of someone who knows building their own computer is not black magic.

Your trenchant commentary on the "Macworld Expo" thread began with a "once removed" retort and polemic to no less than Rush Limbaugh on the political leanings of a computer user based on the platform favoured.

Then you proceeded to condescend to those that don't share your dry, utilitarian, assessment of the impact personal computing has on individuals. (as if someone made you the arbiter of what constitutes "useful")

Finally, in a breathtaking display of solipsistic hubris, you actually criticize mac-users for being humourless, and oversensitive!

Now you have already accused me of being a liar, and I won't return the accusation, despite the lack of credibility on your part I've just demonstrated. As you know, in each of these cases your discussions went downhill after your initial post. But the reason I don't think you're a liar is because I don't believe you possess enough objective awareness to realize there's nothing wrong with a dog that bites you...after you've kicked it.

141 posted on 01/08/2003 8:20:53 PM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
I am Vicki's husband Mike... and I have been reading this thread with great amusement and I thought I would enter my opinions.

I am the IT Manager for a company that manufactures product and currently sells over a million dollars per month. I control several Win2000 servers and a bunch of Windows workstations (only one Mac in the building for compatibility). At my home office I have 4 Macs running OS 8.6 to OSX Jaguar and (one Windows box for compatibility). I also use Virtual PC on my Macs and it works really well.

I am very experienced with both platforms and I find the Macs not only are easier to learn, understand and use, but they are also much faster than the Windows boxes at screen redraw on large graphics, 3D rendering and handsdown better at video editing. When it comes to number crunching, the Mac is just as fast as any WinBox. I mean, how fast do you need it to go, my 40,000 record extract only take 34 seconds on the Mac and the same extract runs 29 seconds on an equivalent WinBox, however a 1600 x 1200 3D ray traced rendering takes 15 minutes on the old Mac 9500 and almost 2 hours on the new WinBox with a GForce 4 Video Card, 1.5 Gigs of Ram and a 2200+ AMD Chip, go figure.

You asked where the value was in a Mac... Bank of America, the largest banking system in the US still uses Mac SE all-in-one machines that were built in 1984 to do what I am sure is complex math. No upgrades minimal upgrades for almost 20 years, and the OS on those machines was FREE. Now lets talk about the difference between the $179.00 OSX Jaguar to the $499.00 Windows XP Pro and all of the previous updates that where in the hundreds.

The problem I see is not in the Hardware or the OS, it is supporting programs. The software developers have, in the past, been forced by contract rangling to stop producing software for the Mac, except for Microsoft of course (who produces OFFICE for OSX minus Access - FileMaker is more user friendly anyway).

The truth is that Game Players are the ones that are driving the market not conservative computer users.

If you die hard Windows supporters would stop buying the overpriced, bug filled, virus prone crap software that Bill's Microsoft Corp produces, prices would drop more on the Macs and developers would get back to cross platform software and you to would be able to benefit from the real UNIX workhorse that does have style too.

The last word is, I spend far more time trying to fix problems on Windows machines than I do Macs and the News Tribune here in Washington, that also prints the New York Times, is in the process of converting the entire company over to OSX servers and over 400 Mac Desktops, PowerBooks and iMacs and there reasons are upgrades and security...

By the way, I am a Conservative Republican, just like Rush Limbaugh, also a G4 Mac owner... enough said!

Mike
142 posted on 01/08/2003 9:11:55 PM PST by Vicki (Truth and Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
Hey, all I'm saying is if you're going to boycott Apple because you think Steve Jobs is liberal, you might as well boycott Bill Gates and Microsoft, too, because he gives all kinds of money to Planned Parenthood and has, as you see in the article, supported gun control measures.

I don't give money to either of them, myself.

143 posted on 01/09/2003 6:45:37 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
BTW, I agree that Clinton/Reno were running essentially a protection racket. If you weren't on their side strongly enough, they came after you through one of their various agencies (e.g., all the conservative groups audited by the IRS).

Clinton wasn't really so much a liberal or a Democrat as he was an out-and-out crook (not that there's all that much difference :-)).

144 posted on 01/09/2003 6:49:20 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
At least in our local Staples, it is true. PCs are not selling and they have reduced the large number they used to display to only two units. My pal who works there told me they have died on the shelves and have a terrible repair record from past sales of these brands.

Hey, I know MAC s do not have a good market share, but that's not the point: they actually work and work well, so why do PC owners hate them? As far as being "liberal" computers, that is ridiculous. Many Freepers use them and we pride ourselves as confirmed, VRWC full-blown, unchanging conservatives.

145 posted on 01/09/2003 8:29:53 AM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
so why do PC owners hate them?

They don't (at least I sure as heck don't). I like to deflate overblown hot-air claims from Mac Fanatics but I have already said Mac's are cool slick computers. Mac Fantatics like to pretend that everybody that does not buy Apple Propaganda hates Mac's but clearly that is not true. If you like your Mac and it gets your job done - GREAT - MY GOD that is the purpose of a computer, to get things done. BUT if you make nonsense BS claims about Mac's or other computer platform I might jump in and call you on it.

Mac people really love their computers (sometimes too much). Mac Fanatics pretend there are Windows fanatics but I have NEVER seen one. I am into computing and have been all of my adult life BUT I am not into a specific computer companies or operating systems – those are peripheral issues in my mind. When it comes to my profession – when you boil it down: I am in it for the money. Case in point: I was a C/C++ programmer in the early 1990’s – most of my computer related friends thought C++ was cool. I noticed they were throwing money at Visual Basic programmer because VB blow the doors off of C++ when it came to the software development life cycle – many of my friends made fun of me because VB was not a real-man’s programming language. Fine, I double my salary when I switch to VB and I can say “VB been very very good to me”. The point is – if I see people are throwing money at Mac-platform programmers I will jump on that platform quicker than you can say “Luxury European Sports Sedan”

As far as being "liberal" computers, that is ridiculous.

I totally agree and I thought that topic was tongue-in-cheek until some Mac Fanatics started insulting me personally - then it turned VERY ugly (and very silly).

146 posted on 01/09/2003 9:26:45 AM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
I totally agree and I thought that topic was tongue-in-cheek until some Mac Fanatics started insulting me personally - then it turned VERY ugly (and very silly).

Ya know...it wouldn't get so personal if you would refrain from phrases like "mac-clowns," "mac-fanatics," and "mac-yorkies" etc...

147 posted on 01/10/2003 4:18:51 AM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
Err, did I make nonsense claims for in my post? I think not. The comment re PC sales at the local Staples are true--it's not a claim. My trusty iMAC computer does just what I want it to do with 99% up time, with virtually no failures after years of experience with four Macs. The only trouble I have had is with the @##%# cable company. If you like PCs, that's just fine. My relatives all do too, and I send them daily emails to prove we are compatible.
148 posted on 01/10/2003 8:06:10 AM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
Funny, your only addition to this thread was to attack me personally and mind-read my motives.
149 posted on 01/10/2003 10:35:45 AM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
Err, did I make nonsense claims for in my post?

PC’s rotting on the shelves is a nonsense statement. I believe PC’s out sell Mac’s like 30 to 1. I will bet your friend is a Mac-head and is applying a little Mac-Wishful-Thinking but I am just guessing. You also said that no one wants to buy Compac (it’s Compaq BTW) and HP computers in your city – I am willing to guess that statement was complete Mac-Wishful-Thinking (see Nonsense) and you have absolutely no data to back up this claim. I will bet if you got a hold of the sales data from the Staples store in question you would be very surprised. Successful nation-wide stores like Staples don’t sell Macs for very good business reasons.

My trusty iMAC computer does just what I want it to do with 99% up time, with virtually no failures after years of experience with four Macs.

Groovy.

If you like PCs, that's just fine.

Gee, thanks. And if you like your Mac, that’s just fine.

Can Mac people talk about their computers without mentioning Windows? I don't think so.

150 posted on 01/10/2003 10:51:56 AM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
Funny, your only addition to this thread was to attack me personally and mind-read my motives.

It's called analysis, and it's not my problem if I understand what you've said before you do.

For example: Paulus made a statement from his direct experience, and you have refused to accept his veracity. You counter with "I am willing to guess that statement was complete Mac-Wishful-Thinking (see Nonsense) and you have absolutely no data to back up this claim."

Do you think there is anyone here that doesn't know you wouldn't accept the veracity of any data what-so-ever if it didn't fit your predetermined conclusions. We all understand there is literally nothing he could say to get you to question or re-examine your own opinion. The only one that doesn't know that is you, and you're quite comfortable attributing the conflict that comes from such pig-headedness to mac-owner intractability.

Talk about clueless.

151 posted on 01/10/2003 2:13:52 PM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
You're right, "rotting on the shelves" was perhaps a tad overboard, but based upon the statement from the friendly salesman at Staples (not a Mac head at all--he likes Windows), who said they were having great problems selling Compaqs and HPS and were down to two floor models used as demos.

On the other hand, Apple now runs their own stores and claim to be selling well. Their new store in Vegas is doing excellent business and it's a nice looking place where a person can actually try the products and get tech help (at last!). Apple also claims that well over 600,000 businesses now are on MAC as they like the sturdy platform and OS 10.2 that seldom crashes. I enjoy these friendly interchanges.

152 posted on 01/10/2003 2:40:06 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
For example: Paulus made a statement from his direct experience, and you have refused to accept his veracity. You counter with "I am willing to guess that statement was complete Mac-Wishful-Thinking (see Nonsense) and you have absolutely no data to back up this claim."

Woahls, you really like making a COMPLETE FOOL OUT OF YOURSELF! Paulus admits his comment was "tad overboard"

You are amazing! You popped in just to insult people - you have posted NOTHING related to the topic of this thread.

153 posted on 01/10/2003 3:21:20 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
On the other hand, Apple now runs their own stores and claim to be selling well. Their new store in Vegas is doing excellent business and it's a nice looking place where a person can actually try the products and get tech help (at last!). Apple also claims that well over 600,000 businesses now are on MAC as they like the sturdy platform and OS 10.2 that seldom crashes. I enjoy these friendly interchanges.

I thought Apple always had there own stores…or at least for a long time.

Fun Facts: I was factory trained on the Apple II, IIe, III, and Lisa.

The Mac has held steady at about a 3% market share - maybe this will change but the iMac and the other "revolutionary" Apple products didn't seem to budge their market share.

I have always liked Apple - I just think their main strategy sucks. On the Apple side you have ONE company driving everything. On the Windows/Intel/IBM/Microsoft/Linux/AMD/etc./etc. side you have hundreds of companies and no one company controls it all (no matter how much Mac-Heads claim Microsoft pulls all the strings - heck, Microsoft does not even make computers).

I have tons of Wintel machines - I use Windows 98 (for my kids games, they are young), Windows 2000 for servers and my recording studio desktop, and Windows XP for my desk, laptop, and my wife's computer. We run a business out of our house so I also host web servers - I use Windows 2000 and Linux. I like the options. I don't want Microsoft dictating to me what I can and can’t do with my machine. If I use Linux I don't want Microsoft Linux - so why the HECK do Mac-People find that one company tells me what I can and can't do model so acceptable. Wouldn’t Mac people rather use REAL Linux than Apple’s Linux variant? I also have Palm and PocketPC PDA’s along with a Blackberry – I like choices (maybe that is why I am not a big fan of the Mac)

Apple is like a communist country. Apple tells you what you want and Apple users say “Please Sir, can I have some more”

If Apple had kept the open architecture of the Apple IIe in the Mac – I bet the Mac would be the dominant computers. But instead Apple went for and still goes for maximum profits. I really don’t like one company having so much power over my computing needs and I can’t figure out why Mac-Heads find that acceptable.

Mac’s are GREAT and you can do whatever it is you want to do on a Mac BUT Mac’s do not blow away PC’s – THAT is the only real gripe I have with Mac-Heads.

154 posted on 01/10/2003 3:44:36 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
I can't resist.

Woahhs, you are such a weenie

Example:

Paulus made a statement from his direct experience

relaying something somebody else said is not "direct experience" (dweeb)

Do you think there is anyone here that doesn't know you wouldn't accept the veracity of any data what-so-ever if it didn't fit your predetermined conclusions

Nobody has presented ANY data so your point is moot (and silly)

Woahhs, if you have any dignity you will stop this line of attacks. If you have something to add to the thread please do - buy if your only goal is to personally insult me - please stop.

155 posted on 01/10/2003 3:50:49 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
You're right, "rotting on the shelves" was perhaps a tad overboard, but based upon the statement from the friendly salesman at Staples (not a Mac head at all--he likes Windows), who said they were having great problems selling Compaqs and HPS and were down to two floor models used as demos.

Funny, only having the floor models left usually implies the items are "selling like hotcakes" - having a large inventory using means something is no selling.

I bought me mom an HP computer for Christmas (1.7GHz,60 G HB,17" monitor, color printer, XP, graphic software, etc., etc,) for $550.00 (amazing!) - anyway I bought it at Best Buy - the place was PACKED with people buying PC's there were lines of people checking out with PC’s - they had PC stacked to the ceiling and they were flying out the door. Fear not - PC's are selling like Hotcakes (for my antagonist friend - THAT is direct experience).

156 posted on 01/10/2003 3:59:48 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
You are amazing! You popped in just to insult people - you have posted NOTHING related to the topic of this thread.

No, I popped in just to insult you. There isn't much else that can make it through your bullet-proof haughteur. And if you would stop trying to "save face" for your previous asininities, I'd leave you alone.

BTW...do you think your hysterical shouting adds any more validity to your "see spot run" charge that I'm making a fool of myself when all I've had to say is visible to everyone on this thread?

I'm really trying to resist the temptation to speculate... as all the people I knew into computers when you say you started in the business were greasy little geeks that spent so much time with machines because they couldn't interface with people. Thankfully, modern computer wizards take baths and spend enough time with people to develop emotionally, but I have to wonder about all those arrested development types that spent so many hours in front of a keyboard back in the seventies; did they ever grow up?

They really where quite pathetic you know. If you talked about anything but computers, they became sullen and displayed all the sophistication of a ten-year-old. If they could get you onto computers though...they showed a morbid disdain that was only offset by the fact that all the normal people knew that was their one and only domain, and were charitable enough to let them keep it.

Damn, looks like I'll have to resist speculating harder.

157 posted on 01/10/2003 4:07:56 PM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
Woahhs, are you going to do ANYTHING other than spew insults and make a fool out of yourself?
158 posted on 01/10/2003 4:12:15 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
Woahhs, if you have any dignity you will stop this line of attacks. If you have something to add to the thread please do - buy if your only goal is to personally insult me - please stop.

No

You are more than welcome to press the abuse button, and let a moderator make the decide whether my contributions to this thread are worth keeping, or if you are a blowhard that can dish it but can't take it.

159 posted on 01/10/2003 4:13:23 PM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
Woahhs, are you going to do ANYTHING other than spew insults and make a fool out of yourself?

This from a person that breaks out the big guns with terms like "dweeb" and "weenie?"

160 posted on 01/10/2003 4:15:29 PM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson