Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What a Fantastic Speech. Watch this one!
1 posted on 01/07/2003 12:30:27 PM PST by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RobFromGa
But the Congress must also understand this: The American people deserve and expect spending discipline in Washington, D.C. (Applause.) With spending discipline and with pro-growth policies, we will expand the economy and help bring down this deficit.

Right, Bush. Spending discipline means zilch to Congress. Where's the beef, Baby Bush? Where's your plan for cutting spending? How is expanding the economy going to bring down the deficit when you are expanding on credit?

This sucks. I am completely disappointed that this is all he could find to say about the "un-tax and spend anyway" Congress.

2 posted on 01/07/2003 12:35:30 PM PST by Glenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
FYI you can listen to the speech now at www.whitehouse.gov Very good speech. He addressed the death tax, marriage penalty tax and taxes on dividends. Now if they can hold the line on spending in Congress we should be in very good shape this year.
4 posted on 01/07/2003 12:47:19 PM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
Rob, my oversight. I see you already have it linked.
5 posted on 01/07/2003 12:48:32 PM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
Thanks I was planing on it thanks for the time info.
6 posted on 01/07/2003 12:49:43 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
"Many jobs are lost in America because government imposes unreasonable regulations, and many jobs are lost because the lawsuit culture of this country imposes unreasonable costs."

These words are perhaps the most important, IMO.

If we can deal with these, we can compete with any country.
7 posted on 01/07/2003 12:54:40 PM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
What a great tax-cut program! I'd personally see around $1500 back from this. I could definitely use that cash.
8 posted on 01/07/2003 12:56:58 PM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bump
9 posted on 01/07/2003 1:22:40 PM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
Bump.
10 posted on 01/07/2003 1:57:32 PM PST by k2blader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
New York Times gives impact of removal of dividend tax:

TAX BENEFITS FOR 2003 BY INCOME:

Income Percentile: 0-20

Income Range*: $0-9,964

Average Change in Tax: -$6

Percentage of Total Income Tax Change: 0.4%

Income Percentile: 20-40

Income Range*: $9,965-21,349

Average Change in Tax: -$20

Percentage of Total Income Tax Change: 1.3%

Income Percentile: 40-60

Income Range*: $21,350-37,834

Average Change in Tax: -$47

Percentage of Total Income Tax Change: 3.0%

Income Percentile: 60-80

Income Range*: $37,835-68,329

Average Change in Tax: -$168

Percentage of Total Income Tax Change: 10.7%

Income Percentile: 80-90

Income Range*: $68,330-98,053

Average Change in Tax: -$304

Percentage of Total Income Tax Change: 9.7%

Income Percentile: 90-95

Income Range*: $98,054-133,858

Average Change in Tax: -$622

Percentage of Total Income Tax Change: 9.9%

Income Percentile: 95-99

Income Range*: $133,859-316,894

Average Change in Tax: -$1,777

Percentage of Total Income Tax Change: 22.7%

Income Percentile: 99-100

Income Range*: $316,895 and up

Average Change in Tax: -$13,243

Percentage of Total Income Tax Change: 42.3%

*Adjusted gross income on tax return

11 posted on 01/07/2003 2:22:26 PM PST by MurryMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
This is a must watch speech. It was terrific. Turn off O'Reilly and switch to C-Span at 8:00.

The battle lines for our economic recovery have been drawn...and the 2004 campaign has begun!

May God bless President George W. Bush.
15 posted on 01/07/2003 2:34:07 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
"We will not rest until every business has a chance to grow, and every person who wants to find work can find a job."

I hope he meant legal and ethical growth and legal citizens.

17 posted on 01/07/2003 2:36:22 PM PST by Dust in the Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
"The role of government is not to manage or control the economy from Washington, D.C., but to remove obstacles standing in the way for faster economic growth. That's our role."


The best line of the speech and I'm sure little tommy and his cronies didn' even hear it
21 posted on 01/07/2003 4:20:49 PM PST by Rightly Biased
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
I'm for getting totally rid of the marriage penalty NOW! 100%!
23 posted on 01/07/2003 6:44:03 PM PST by Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
Great speech Dubya. The RATS are running for cover. You pre-empted their asses but good. I am wondering, though. You said,
Under this new program, Americans who face the greatest difficulties in finding work will receive up to $3,000 to use in their job search. They will have great flexibility in how they use that money. A person with a Re-Employment Account will be able to decide whether to use the funds for job training, or child care, or transportation, or even to cover the costs of relocating to another city for a new job. If the job is obtained quickly -- within 13 weeks -- the worker will be able to keep the cash balance as a "Re-employment bonus."
But what happens to a person who takes 20 weeks to find a job and spends, say, $1500 of the $3000. Do they have to give the remaining $1500 back because it took longer than 13 weeks to find a job? Also, anyone here wondering if this $3000 bonus is an income redistribution scheme?
25 posted on 01/07/2003 7:45:47 PM PST by upchuck (Attention John Edwards: I'm a FRregular person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
Sorry to be a wet blanket, but I believe President Bush is making a huge mistake in implying that the president actually has that much influence on the economy. The economy runs in cycles that have very little to do with who is in the office of the president at the time. The time delay between enactment of policy and impact on the economy is often years. The massive debt that has been amassed by the citizens of this country is going to come due with devastating consequences and the president, federal reserve, etc. have little hope of circumventing the coming crash. Unfortunately, the Clinton bubble has not fully deflated. Can you say Hoover?

Remember how as the economy was booming through the 90s, conservatives were saying that this was in spite of Clinton. Now, why do we act differently when a Republican is in the White House? How about some consistency on the right?
29 posted on 01/07/2003 10:22:09 PM PST by Rockitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
Greetings Rob: Loved the speech too! But it seems a Quisling Progressive shot has fired over the American people's bow.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30366 Democrats to raise doubts about America Strategy memo calls for undermining public confidence in Bush -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: January 8, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jon Dougherty © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

Hoping for significant gains in the 2004 elections, Democrats plan to undermine public confidence in President Bush by questioning his credibility while raising doubts about the U.S. at a time when American troops are deploying for war against Iraq, political website Capitol Hill Blue reports.

According to the report, a Democratic talking-points memo devised last year by senior party consultants and elected leaders outlines "a strategy to raise public doubts of the president's real intentions," including:

Claims that the war against Iraq is being fought over oil and for oil companies loyal to Bush and Republicans;

Claiming the administration "manufactured" evidence against Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to convince Britain and other allies to join the war;

Suggestions that a wartime economy is the only way the White House can boost a sagging economic picture. "It is clear that the current approval ratings of the administration are tied directly to strong American feelings toward traditional values," the memo says, according to CHB, which obtained a copy. "To counter this, doubt must be raised as to America's true position within the world community and the true intent of the Bush administration in waging war."

"The talking points were developed before the end of last year and sent out to operatives and friendly media," one Democratic consultant said. "No Democratic member of Congress will question the president's patriotism openly, but we will use the media and other surrogates to raise doubts."

CHB indicates that in the coming weeks Democratic lawmakers will question Bush's intentions regarding the looming Iraq war. Writers and broadcasters friendly to the Democratic Party "have already been provided talking points suggesting the war is about oil, not terrorism," CHB reported.

Not all Democrats are taking part, the newssite reported.

"My boss doesn't want anything to do with it," one senior Senate aide said Monday. "You don't undermine this country to win elections."

But others are willing to try any tactic to put the White House on the defensive and regain Democratic control of Congress.

"The real war isn't in Iraq," one Democratic consultant said. "It's right here at home, at the ballot box in 2004."

Other points Democrats will try to make in the coming weeks include the alleged influence and control over Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney by the oil and defense industries, as well as other special interest groups; that the war on terrorism has failed thus far because al-Qaida founder and leader Osama bin Laden is reportedly still alive; that the U.S. is not prepared for another terror attack on its soil because the administration is preoccupied with Iraq; and that Bush will be forced to raise taxes to finance the Iraqi war.

"It's time to take the battle to the people and make them understand just how dangerous George W. Bush's policies are to the future of America," says the talking points memo, according to CHB.

Unnamed Democratic sources named Democratic National Committee chief Terry McAuliffe, former Clinton campaign strategist James Carville, Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle and former House Democratic Leader Dick Gephardt as party leaders who developed the talking-points memo.

"This is a classic, Jim Carville, scorched-earth campaign," one DNC staffer said. "Take no prisoners. That's how you win elections."

So far, at least, Democrats may have trouble getting traction with their strategy.

Bush unveiled yesterday a $674 billion, 10-year plan to cut dividend taxes while imploring Congress to make his $1.35 trillion tax cut plan passed in 2001 permanent.

"Americans are scheduled to receive tax cuts in 2004 and 2006 ... and the time to deliver tax rate reductions is now, when they can do the most good for American businesses," Bush said in a speech to the Economic Club in Chicago.

The president also called on Congress to accelerate the tax break for married couples, scheduled for 2009, and speed up the tax credit for families with children, who aren't scheduled to get the break until 2010.

"I am asking the United States to abolish the double taxation of dividends," Bush said. "By ending this investment penalty, we will strengthen investor confidence. By ending double taxation of dividends, we will increase the return on investing to draw more money into the markets, to provide capital to build factories, to buy equipment, hire more people."

On Monday, the U.S. dollar rose against the euro and Japanese yen on news of Bush's stimulus package. Wall Street also responded positively to Bush's plan.

And according to at least one new survey, released yesterday, nearly two-thirds of Americans say when the stock market goes up it benefits the economy and all Americans.

Among investors, the poll found, 77 percent said a healthy stock market benefits everyone.

Meanwhile, surveys continue to show strong support across the country for Bush regarding a possible war with Iraq.

31 posted on 01/08/2003 6:14:16 AM PST by OneLoyalAmerican (Benedict Arnold Would Be A New York Times Hero In 2003!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

32 posted on 01/08/2003 11:11:50 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson