Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush unveils economic stimulus plan
Associated Press ^ | January 7, 2003 | Associated Press Staff

Posted on 01/07/2003 9:38:38 AM PST by MeekOneGOP


Bush unveils economic stimulus plan

01/07/2003

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - President Bush put forward a "growth and jobs" economic stimulus plan on Tuesday that would provide tax relief to an estimated 92 million Americans by accelerating income tax rate cuts, wiping out all federal taxes on stock dividends paid to investors and boosting the child tax credit by $400 per child.

The administration estimated its latest economic stimulus package would carry a 10-year price tag of $674 billion, more than double what the president had been considering only a week ago.

Leaving the White House for a Chicago speech where he will begin selling the plan, Bush strode toward his helicopter with his new chief economic adviser, Steve Friedman, alongside, and a clutch of other top aides following behind.

The two major elements of the package would be a total elimination of the federal tax that investors pay on their stock dividend earnings and an immediate acceleration -- retroactive to Jan. 1 -- of the tax rate cuts that had been scheduled to take effect in 2004 and 2006.

Even before the administration released the details of its stimulus program, it was being attacked by Democrats who charged that it offered too little to lower-income Americans while providing costly tax breaks to wealthy Americans under the guise of providing a quick jump-start to the sluggish economy.

The administration said that $102 billion of the cost of the program would occur in 2003 and the rest of the $674 billion total cost would be spread out over the next decade.

The biggest element of the package would be the total elimination of taxes on corporate dividends which the administration estimated would cost $364 billion over 10 years.

The acceleration of the tax rate cuts in the 2001 tax law would cost $64 billion while the acceleration of the child tax credit, currently at $600, would cost $91 billion, according to administration's estimates of 10-year costs.

Bush's 10-year $1.35 trillion tax package that Congress passed in 2001 called for further rate cuts but not until 2004 and 2006. It also phased in increases in the per child tax credit but the $1,000 level would not have been reached until 2010.

The administration said that checks reflecting the higher child care credit would be issued this year and it estimated 34 million families would benefit from this element of the president's plan.

The administration also proposed accelerating planned relief from the so-called marriage penalty which hits two-earner couples. Accelerating relief for the marriage penalty, which would have been fully effective in 2009, was estimated to have a 10-year cost of $58 billion.

"This is a plan that provides tax relief to the working citizens," Bush said Monday. "It's a plan that is a very fair plan. It's a plan that recognizes when somebody has more of their own money, they're likely to spend it, which creates more jobs."

The administration estimated that the various elements to accelerate tax breaks in the 2001 legislation would provide tax relief to 92 million taxpayers with the average reduction totaling $1,083 in 2003.

Breaking that figure down further, the administration said in a fact sheet that 46 million married couples would receive an average tax cut of $1,716 this year while 23 million small business owners would receive tax cuts averaging $2,042.

The administration said its package would provide $1,100 in tax relief this year to a typical family of four with two wage earners making a combined income of $39,000.

In addition to the tax relief for individuals, Bush's package would boost tax relief for small businesses by expanding the amount of equipment purchases they can write off as deductions from the current $25,000 to $75,000 and index future increases to inflation.

The president's Council of Economic Advisers estimated that all the tax relief, by providing consumers and businesses with more spending power, would boost economic growth and create an additional 2.1 million jobs over the next three years.

The president also proposed as part of his plan reinstating the extended unemployment benefits which expired on Dec. 28, making the benefits retroactive for the nearly 800,000 laid off workers who lost their benefits last month.

Word of Bush's plans to eliminate taxes on stock dividends helped spur the stock market as the Dow increased by more than 170 points Monday.

Democrats offered a rival tax-cutting plan and said Bush's favors the rich.

"The president really is investing $600 billion on an old, old Republican theory of trickle-down economics," said Rep. George Miller, D-Calif. "We're saying no. Give it to the people who need it."

The Democratic plan would expand unemployment benefits by 26 weeks and give all workers a refundable income tax rebate of up to $300 per person or $600 per working couple. States would get $31 billion for homeland security, highway, Medicaid and unemployment insurance programs.

After tackling the unemployment benefits issue, Bush wants Congress to create "Personal Re-Employment Accounts" of up to $3,000 that could be used by states in a variety of ways -- including awarding bonuses to people who quickly leave unemployment rolls.

Under the two-year, the federal government would give the states $3.6 billion to fund the account, which could be used by people who have exhausted their unemployment insurance or are likely to do so. The money could be used to pay for child care, job training, transportation, moving costs and other expenses of finding a job, according to Bush's proposal. The administration estimated 1.2 million Americans could take advantage of these new accounts.


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/latestnews/stories/010703dnnatbush.6231896.html


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: economicstimulus; presidentbush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 01/07/2003 9:38:38 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"The president really is investing $600 billion on an old, old Republican theory of trickle-down economics," said Rep. George Miller, D-Calif. "We're saying no. Give it to the people who need it."

Someone needs to inform Rep. Miller that the president isn't "giving" anything to anyone. He's not "investing" anything at all. He's refraining from taking as much as he has in the past.

2 posted on 01/07/2003 9:45:35 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Miller sounds like a true socialist: "From each according to his ability to each according to his need." Hasn't he read Ayn Rand? Why work at all, if you don't get any benefit out of it? If all your extra effort goes to the folks lounging in the "safety hammock," there goes motivation.
3 posted on 01/07/2003 9:50:12 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I like the plan, as far as it goes, but I have to disagree with the President's reasoning.

He wants to tax us less so we will spend and invest the difference and help the economy.

He should tax us less because our taxes are outrageously and immorally high, regardless of whether it helps the economy. The fact that it will is just gravy.

Shalom.
4 posted on 01/07/2003 9:52:47 AM PST by ArGee (Good grief! Now I have to think of a clever tag line?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Miller deserves a Freep. I just gave him one.
5 posted on 01/07/2003 10:05:52 AM PST by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
Local reaction to Bush's plan that I have heard includes;

Dividends? All my stocks are worthless, what good is that?

Income tax cuts? Now? My problem is that I can't get a job and have no income. Where were they years ago?

Job training? My problem is I'm overqualified for everything already.

Here, the unemployed are fiftyish homeowners with kids in college. They are basically screwed.

I figure I'll open up a cyanide cool aid stand and clean up.

6 posted on 01/07/2003 10:13:49 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
That's the ticket. Don't just whine and wish for the old days. Find something new you can do to make money.

I'd probably sell overpriced coffee instead of cyanide kool-aid, though. A sustainable business plan needs repeat customers.

Shalom.
7 posted on 01/07/2003 10:25:33 AM PST by ArGee (Good grief! Now I have to think of a clever tag line?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
RUSH IS COMMENTING ON THIS NOW. Bush is such a refreshing change from socialist Bill.
8 posted on 01/07/2003 10:38:16 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Do you listen to Rush online? Have a link?
9 posted on 01/07/2003 10:42:34 AM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I had to post this (without making it a vanity): I was channel-surfing earlier, and flipped across CNN and saw a segment on the economy, with the headline "It's the economy....again.", the Clintons' favorite catchphrase in '92. Is James Carville running all of CNN, now?
10 posted on 01/07/2003 10:44:13 AM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: MeeknMing
I just heard Bush's speech on Rush's show. The Dems are going to have a hard time spinning this into a bad plan. Ending the marriage tax now, not gradually over 6 years, getting the tax cuts now, not 10 years form now (an retroactive to Jan 21st last year!). I didn't get the whole package because I am at work and had to answer radios and phones, but I'm for everything I heard.

Go Bush Go!

12 posted on 01/07/2003 10:50:18 AM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unix
Go here
13 posted on 01/07/2003 10:51:39 AM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
I feel very bad for them. But I'd feel worse if it was me.

Fortunately, I never was able to get any kind of useful education and never was able to get hired in any company that offered any kind of stable job, never mind a career.

Therefore, I knew from the beginning that the only chance I would ever have would be that which I made for myself.
And I never had the luxury of thinking that I had a future beyond what I made.

These former execs and techies have no experience in misery hopelessness and eating dirt to survive. Tough things to learn at fifty.

14 posted on 01/07/2003 10:53:15 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hattend
thanks bud...
15 posted on 01/07/2003 10:54:55 AM PST by Michael Barnes (non gratum anus rodentum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lavocat
Looks like you've bought the liberal "Animal Farm!"
16 posted on 01/07/2003 10:57:41 AM PST by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: lavocat
What is best to stimulate economic growth? Answer that and you then have a basis to be critical of this plan.Higher growth ONLY happens at the margins, by reducing the costs to increased output for each additional dollar earned.

The tax code is not the place to worry about redistribution of income.That is Congress's job when its SPENDS, not when it collects the revenue.
18 posted on 01/07/2003 11:10:44 AM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lavocat
My problem with this plan is that 42% of the total sum will benifit 1% of the population.

Copy and paste your statement at the DU. I'm sure you will be lavished with praise.

19 posted on 01/07/2003 11:13:55 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lavocat
The RATS want to give you a check for $300...is that plan better for you? Just wondering...is that better than accelerating the tax cuts and eliminating dividends? You DUers are so funny.
20 posted on 01/07/2003 11:19:06 AM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson