Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkinsaw
The answer is: Guys are bigger and stronger than girls (Janet Reno nothwithstanding) and should be held to a higher account.

Besides, how could a girl FORCE a guy to....you know....I mean, how wimpy must a guy be.

42 posted on 01/06/2003 7:21:31 PM PST by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Eagle
how could a girl FORCE a guy to....you know....I mean, how wimpy must a guy be.

I see, so you think that a male getting raped is wimpy... it's his own fault... no crime here... he should be happy he got some. Sounds like blaming the victim and condoning taking advantage of the weak to me. You're all class. It's also nice to know that you think that justice actually does depend on a person's physical attributes. Were your ancestors big fans of slavery and Jim Crow laws?

66 posted on 01/06/2003 8:02:43 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Eagle
The answer is: Guys are bigger and stronger than girls (Janet Reno nothwithstanding) and should be held to a higher account.

I see. So the law should take into account the weakness of the female gender in every aspect of life where it might apply? Or just in instances favorable to the female gender?

Some would say that women have higher reasoning capabilities than men. Should they get longer prison sentences for crimes that require planning since they should be held to a higher standard? Should the law ignore INTENT on such crimes because women should know better than men? I doubt that such a standard would survive long and neither should yours. Equal protection under the law is actually a pretty good idea.
88 posted on 01/06/2003 8:26:25 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson