Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Freedom of the business owner? What a riot. It's your selfish need to serve your own habit over anyone else's concerns be it owner or fellow patron that is the problem here.

Your self-righteous comments aside - what about the business owner who is a smoker??? And since it is perfectly legal in about 20 states to refuse to hire someone based upon whether they smoke or not, why shouldn't a smoking owner who only hires smokers have the freedom to cater to smokers???

51 posted on 01/06/2003 8:21:48 AM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
Owner A wants to allow smoking. Owner B, C and D don't. Guess where the smokers are going to go. Yep, you guessed it. About ten minutes after this great idea goes into effect B, C and D allow smoking again. Look, it's either all or nothing, otherwise those who do the right thing are at a disadvantage. And non-smokers would once again have no place to go out to dinner unless they didn't mind trying to smell their food through a cloud of smoke.

Just because smokers don't want to taste or smell their food, that doesn't mean that every other patron must forgoe the pleasure.

96 posted on 01/06/2003 8:59:26 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson