Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hungry millions denied food by Mugabe's ban (RHODESIA ALERT)
The Daily Telegraph ^ | January 4, 2003 | Peta Thornycroft

Posted on 01/03/2003 5:25:17 PM PST by MadIvan

Robert Mugabe is refusing to let Zimbabweans import food, a decision which is condemning millions of people to shortages, United Nations officials said yesterday.

More than 5,000 people gathered at Viriri School, Murambinda, 140 miles south of Harare, to collect hand-outs of corn, beans and oil from the World Food Programme.

Patience Mukondomi, 31, was not given any. As a teacher she has a job and therefore does not qualify for aid. "There is nothing in the shops. We have money, but there is no food to buy, please sell us some," she implored officials.

But Luis Clemens, a WFP spokesman, explained that doing so would be against the rules. "We cannot sell food, however much we want to help people," he said.

"We would be able to feed many more people if the government allowed private importation of corn."

The Mugabe regime has awarded a monopoly on trading in grain to a government agency and there are countless verified reports from opposition supporters that they have been denied permission to buy this food.

At the WFP distribution centre another desperate woman, with a baby on her back, said her husband was in the army 40 miles further south and so she too did not qualify for food aid.

"We are starving," she said. "Even if my husband sent money, which he doesn't because I am the second wife, there is no food to buy. My neighbour helps me. Without her we would be dead."

The neighbour is one of three million people receiving food from WFP, half of those on the brink of starvation. Mugabe undertook to feed the rest, but has been unable to find foreign currency to import anything but a trickle of grain from South Africa.

"Private importation of corn would change the situation dramatically," said Mr Clemens. "We have made the offer to facilitate the importation of food, but there is no change in policy."

He said the WFP would need to continue its Zimbabwe operations beyond April, when harvests are due.

Few crops have been planted by the inexperienced farmers who replaced more than 4,000 white commercial farmers evicted in the past three years under the government's land reforms.

Teresa Madamombe, 41 a mother of five, said: "This is the first time in our lives there is no food to buy. In 1983 and in 1992 there was drought, but we could buy food, but not now, and I do not know why."

She said she knew nothing of the destruction of Zimbabwe's commercial agriculture. "We do not get news here. We are far from the commercial farms. Have they all gone?"

A thin young man overheard the conversation, sidled up and whispered: "There is no food because of politics. You must know that. Industries which make food have closed down now that the farmers have gone.

"We can't talk politics because there has been violence here, but we do know why we have no food."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: africawatch; mugabe; rhodesia; starvation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Mugabe, much like Stalin, is trying to starve his nation into submission. He will burn in Hell for this - it should be Britain that arranges his transport there.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 01/03/2003 5:25:17 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *AfricaWatch; Clive; Cincinatus' Wife; backhoe; BigWaveBetty; widgysoft; Da_Shrimp; BlueAngel; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 01/03/2003 5:26:05 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Just as long as the US does NOT send them food. Let them riot mugabe's house and steal his food and learn the truth.
3 posted on 01/03/2003 5:31:14 PM PST by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Tony Blair is too weak. He's too afraid of being called an imperialist. He'll stand up to Iraq, but only because it's in Britain's national interest to stop madmen from getting nukes. The people of Zimbabwe don't matter to Tony, so he's going to let them starve to horrible deaths.

The same goes for Bush. The Bush administration is barely even trying to oppose Mugable.

4 posted on 01/03/2003 5:46:35 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl; MadIvan
Just as long as the US does NOT send them food. Let them riot mugabe's house and steal his food and learn the truth.

How can you be so cold? Remember this nation of people tried to get rid of him, but rigged elections etc. did not allow it to happen. I will not condemn the people of Rhodesia for the sins of a sick bastard.

5 posted on 01/03/2003 6:17:24 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: xm177e2
" The people of Zimbabwe don't matter to Tony, so he's going to let them starve to horrible deaths. "

Um, Tony Blair, or George Bush, have as much to do with starvation in Zimbabwe as Milton Berle. The people elected Mugabe, mistake number one. Then he took over and made it a dictatorship. Oops, where have we seen that before? So, who is to blame? Primarily Mugabe and his henchmen, secondarily the people of Zimbabwe.

Take that blame Britian/America crap somewhere else. Those two countries don't starve anyone, but you knew that, didn't you?

7 posted on 01/03/2003 6:26:50 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
The first election that he won was not rigged, by African standards anyway. Which means, yes there was fraud, but no more than usual.
8 posted on 01/03/2003 6:28:04 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
Which means, yes there was fraud, but no more than usual.

We aren't talking Chad-gate here. Do you NOT recall quite recently people who walked miles and miles to vote (over days) to vote that sick bastard out. And he closed the polling stations? Indigenous Rhodesian people, I believe, do not condone what this sad sick individual has brought on his nation in terms of famine. (One of the few African Nations capable of being self-supportive??!!). And now those who tried to resist most, are those who must suffer most. How ironic.

9 posted on 01/03/2003 6:41:48 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
The people of Zimbabwe tried to stop him from winning reelection, but by then he had established himself as dictator-for-life. They can't stop him now because he has all the guns and all the food.

I agree Bush and Blair have other priorities, namely saving the world from nuclear devastation at the hands of Hussein and Kim Jong-Il. The responsibility is mostly Thabo Mbeki's, without his cooperation, it's much harder for any intervention to take place.

10 posted on 01/03/2003 7:13:40 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Than why did you try to make it a Blair/Bush created problem in your #4 post?

Frankly, I am sick of the starvation problems in Africa.I have read and heard of them my entire life.Throwing money and food at them will never "solve" the problems of third world countries.Was that not why the Black Africaans kicked out the "Europeans" in the 1980s?

Certainly, the "West" could end the misery and suffering of the people of Africa,but the people of Africa would have to change in order for this to be done.

They appear not to want to actually join the 21st century.It seems fairly obvious they just want the rest of the world to subsidise their continuation of tribal society, but with "free" food, clean water, electricity and medicine.

If the CIA or any agency killed Mugabe today, it would not truly matter.Another "leader" of the same ilk would simply take his place, and the whole process of hope denied would repeat itself.

Should the Imperialistic West conquer and colonise Africa again?Is that why you blame Blair/Bush for African starvation?Because they do not use military power to conquer Africa and force "free" food upon the starving masses?

11 posted on 01/03/2003 8:15:05 PM PST by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
She said she knew nothing of the destruction of Zimbabwe's commercial agriculture. "We do not get news here. We are far from the commercial farms. Have they all gone?"

Think maybe the people will start fighting back??

12 posted on 01/03/2003 8:20:15 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
Frankly, I am sick of the starvation problems in Africa.I have read and heard of them my entire life.

So sick of hearing of the problems in Africa. Yeah. On a full belly, it's easy to dismiss, I guess.

Throwing money and food at them will never "solve" the problems of third world countries.Was that not why the Black Africaans kicked out the "Europeans" in the 1980s?

The 1980's. Yeah that was AGES ago. I'm Irish, now living under the Celtic Tiger. But in the 1970's Irish people were only learning sophistication, and many went with hunger in their bellies. So your point is?

As for Mugabwe's regime, people forget Rhodesia is a state that is self sufficient in Africa. A place that can fend for itself, and the people attempted to topple (by democratic means) Mugabwe but the bastard wouldn't let them vote. This is not like Irish people going up to vote, or Floridians spoiling a vote or what have you..these are people who walked to polling stations for two freakin' days. How DARE you challenge their belief in democracy, when most Americans won't get off their fat arses to drive their chevvy's down to a polling booth? I'm sorry. But you do not espouse conservatism to me.

13 posted on 01/03/2003 8:29:29 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
So shall the USA fix all the worlds problems, Happygal?

It can be done, but the price seems too high for those who believe in utopia.The price of survival requires change.

BTW, I have experienced actual hunger, and have stolen food,for survival, in the USA, many years ago.

Perhaps you need to step back for a moment and look at who wants and needs food now, and why.I know hunger.I also know if I did not change, my hunger would be everlasting.

There are lots of "rich" people in Amerika, but I can testify, there are many more who are not rich, who have busted their @ss to keep food on the table, and who are not willing to continuously cast pearls before swine.

I will always offer a hand up, but I know better than to offer a hand out.Been there, done that, and used the t-shirt to wash my car!

Take your self-righteous attitude to God for judgement.I will continue to help my neighbor, or quietly donate money I can ill afford to true charities, or just cover the woman in front of me at the check out counter at the grocery store, so she does not have to "put back" the $1.99 cocoa with marshmellows treat for her children.

What do you do with your childs outgrown clothing? Do you sell it at a garage sale, or do you find a charity who will freely give it those in need at a faith based charity, not of your own faith ? Do you write it off for tax purposes?

Your thinly veiled holier-than- thou attitude does not impress me much.

14 posted on 01/03/2003 9:54:41 PM PST by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
What do you know of Zimbabwe/Rhodesia?

You seem to class its people as a 'monkeys hanging from the trees' State. So pray tell, how do YOU believe AID should be delivered to this particular country?

I know in my own country, the troops are already mobilising..to send food for the hungry .

I actually work with a guy (a former Reuters journalist, who is now working as a journalist beside me in Ireland, who was stationed in Rhodesia for a while).

BTW..I'm not being 'holier than thou' Far be it for me to be like that.

I'd say your own conscience has been pricked.

So hop to it!
Get people in your own area to raise food parcels for the people of Rhodesia/Zimbabwe.
15 posted on 01/03/2003 10:05:09 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
The people of "Rhodesia," those who could run fast enough to avoid being killed and eaten, are now in Australia, Britain, the USA, and throughout the world.

The people of "Zimbabwe," easily able to live on their racism and hatred alone, showing true black fury and wrath as they starve, are getting what they wanted. They didn't care if the hand of their rulers beat them, starved them, stabbed them, shot them, as long as that hand was not white.

16 posted on 01/03/2003 10:12:04 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
BTW..your thinly veiled expression of having experienced hunger sticks in my throat.

I'm 30 years of age. (NOW a qualified journalist, and my brother is a qualified accountant). But I slept at the end of my parents room until I was 18, in a house with an outside toilet. (YES..that was until 1990). WHY, because my mother put OUR education over material fancies. So DO NOT bullshit me with you predelictions.
17 posted on 01/03/2003 10:13:00 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: crystalk; MadIvan
So HOW do you explain the lines of people who walked for days, only to be denied their franchise at the Mugabwe rigged polling booths?

Don't be SO naive...PLEASE.
18 posted on 01/03/2003 10:15:47 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Rhodesia WAS a state that was self sufficient. So were Sumeria and Assyria. That is ancient history.

Only black Zimbabweans are left, but now there are 14 million of them, used to being fed by the whites no longer there.

It should be remembered that (at the stone age level of black technology which existed in that country before 1890 and after 2005) it will only support about 200,000 persons, and those at levels that a chimpanzee would not envy.

19 posted on 01/03/2003 10:16:32 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
This country was able to feed itself quite amply until MUGABWE (Ye know, the bloke who rigged the last election) took power.


HOW do I try to explain this to you?

Mugabwe is the disease in this country. Not the people themselves.
20 posted on 01/03/2003 10:22:59 PM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson