Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'US forces cannot enter Pakistan'
The News, Pakistan ^

Posted on 01/03/2003 2:35:33 PM PST by milestogo

'US forces cannot enter Pakistan'

Islamabad queries Washington's claim to hot pursuit

ISLAMABAD: Interior Minister Faisal Saleh Hayat rejected the US military's statement that it was allowed to pursue attackers of its forces in Afghanistan into Pakistan.

Hayat told AFP on Friday: "There is no room or legal sanctions for any cross-border operation by US forces to pursue fugitives into Pakistani territory. We have no such policy. There is no question of allowing any hot pursuit into our territory."

He said the US forces have been working with Pakistani troops along the border to hunt al-Qaeda and Taliban extremists for more than a year. He described the cooperation as 'excellent' and added: "Pakistani agencies and forces have been carrying out the task successfully and there is close liaison with coalition forces operating in Afghanistan."

Information Minister Sheikh Rashid also reacted sharply to the hot pursuit claims. "We would like to remind them (US military) that we are perfectly capable of securing our borders and the question of allowing any foreign troops into Pakistani territory does not even arise," Rashid said.

Sheikh Rashid Ahmed said it is not proper for outside forces to enter Pakistan in search of terrorists without understanding and permission of the government. Responding to a US official's statement that their forces can cross Pakistani border, he said: "It is not proper if anyone claims that it can pursue across Pakistan's border." He said Pakistan is lending support to the international community and the US in the fight against terrorists. "We will give it if they seek our support against terrorists. We have an understanding with them and we will continue our policy," he added.

He vehemently denied that any terrorists were getting shelter in Pakistan. This reaction of the ministers came following a statement of a spokeswoman for US military in Afghanistan who had said on Thursday that the US forces might pursue attackers who attempt to escape into Pakistan. The statement was made in a clarification of events surrounding a US warplane's bombing of a religious school on December 29 on border. In the incident a Harrier jet had dropped a 500-pound bomb on the school after a Pakistani border scout fired on a US patrol and retreated to the school, the spokeswoman said. Islamabad had said that the bomb had fallen in Pakistani territory, while the US spokeswoman said the building was within the internationally recognised Afghan border.

A government official told AFP on condition of anonymity that there was an exchange of fire between the US and Pakistani forces, and that two border scouts were injured. He said tension had been brewing for several days between the two sides at the border over the Pakistani post. "A Pakistani scout had a nasty fight with some members of coalition forces and returned to his base and fired at the coalition patrol. "There was exchange of fire in which two scouts were injured."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: southasialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 01/03/2003 2:35:33 PM PST by milestogo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: milestogo
Looks like Pakistan is interested in becoming a smoking hole. I think we should oblige them.
2 posted on 01/03/2003 2:38:25 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
Translation: "Anyone attacking US forces is welcome in Pakistan."
3 posted on 01/03/2003 2:40:00 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
What's new. You surely didn't think that we were after terrorists do you? We let the Taliban all escape to Pak. But we got those agreements for the oil pipeline plus flooding the world with opium. I'd call that success.
4 posted on 01/03/2003 2:42:55 PM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
This is pretty tough stance by Pakistan at this point. Where did you find this link? Is this a reputable news source?
5 posted on 01/03/2003 2:43:27 PM PST by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger
"Try and stop us, and we'll engage as hostile forces in collusion with the enemy."
6 posted on 01/03/2003 2:44:17 PM PST by PokeyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
What the hell! Turn India loose on them.
7 posted on 01/03/2003 2:44:31 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
SOme more info here too...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/816359/posts
8 posted on 01/03/2003 2:45:08 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
If we hadn't let them go in the first place we wouldn't be having this problem.

There should have been 50,000 US troops on the ground sealing off the escape routs before our mercenaries backed up by another 50,000 US troops started the ground offensive. I was saying that back then.

We cannot defend ourselves if we are cowards.

The Afghan war was a failure because of US unwillingness to accept casualties. That's what Bin Laden was counting on. He was right.

One of the reasons Bin Laden felt secure enough to attack us in America was because of the demonstrated cowardice of our politicians to let the military do it's job.

Our soldiers are brave patriots and wanted to go. Our politicians are cowards of the lowest order.
9 posted on 01/03/2003 2:46:56 PM PST by stalin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
If Pakistan cannot police its own border, either with Jammu/Kashmir or with India, or with Afghanistan, then how shall they stop hot pursuit?
10 posted on 01/03/2003 2:48:49 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
>>'US forces cannot enter Pakistan' <<

As long as Pakistan exists, that is.

How do you say, "Let's roll" in Hindi?

11 posted on 01/03/2003 2:49:14 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stalin
The Afghan way was a failure... In the Bizzarro World, perhaps.
12 posted on 01/03/2003 2:49:18 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
This is pretty tough stance by Pakistan at this point.

Actually, it's been their public stance from the start. They've never given us permission to conduct "hot pursuit."

We do conduct joint operations, though, and that's how we've caught some pretty big fish.

The radical islamics in that country are trying to make political hay over this latest incident, staging some protests around the country. This rhetoric coming out of Islamabad is undoubtedly meant for their ears.

Pakistan knows full well that it can't stop any hot pursuit, and they're not going to try. Politically, however, they can't publicly give free run of the country to US troops without causing an awful lot of domestic strife.

13 posted on 01/03/2003 2:50:20 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
Here is the AFP version of this report...

Pakistan queries US military claim to cross-border raid rights

Friday, 03-Jan-2003 7:00AM      Story from AFP / Rana Jawad
Copyright 2003 by Agence France-Presse (via ClariNet)

</CLARI-ITEM HEADER>

ISLAMABAD, Jan 3 (AFP) - Pakistan's Interior Minister Faisal Saleh Hayat on Friday rejected the US military's statement that it was allowed to pursue attackers of its forces in Afghanistan into neighbouring Pakistan.

"There is no room or legal sanctions for any cross-border operation by US forces to pursue fugitives into Pakistani territory. We have no such policy," Hayat told AFP.

"There is no question of allowing any hot pursuit into our territory."

Information Minister Sheikh Rashid also reacted sharply to the hot pursuit claims.

"We would like to remind them (US military) that we are perfectly capable of securing our borders and the question of allowing any foreign troops into Pakistani territory does not even arise," Rashid told AFP.

A US military spokeswoman in Afghanistan on Thursday said US forces "may pursue attackers who attempt to escape into Pakistan to evade capture or retaliation... with the express consent of the Pakistani government."

The statement was made in a clarification of events surrounding a US warplane's bombing of an empty religious school on December 29 on the porous Pakistani-Afghan border.

A Harrier jet dropped a 500-pound bomb on the school after a Pakistani border scout fired on a US patrol and retreated to the school, from where firing continued, a US military spokeswoman said.

Islamabad said the bomb fell in Pakistani territory, while the US spokeswoman said the building was within the internationally recognised Afghan border.

She said it was in "a grey area," 300 meters beyond a Pakistani border post which had been established inside Afghan territory.

Pakistani authorities say no-one was injured by the bomb.

Reports of the incident have outraged Pakistan's Islamist-ruled North West Frontier Province, where anti-US feeling has run high during the 14-month old military campaign against the Taliban and al-Qaeda.

US forces have been working with Pakistani troops along the border to hunt al-Qaeda and Taliban extremists for more than a year.

Pakistan's Hayat described the cooperation as "excellent."

"Pakistani agencies and forces have been carrying out the task successfully and there is close liaison with coalition forces operating in Afghanistan," the minister said.

"In view of the close cooperation there is no question of allowing any hot pursuit into our territory."

A US soldier was wounded in the head during the border incident. The border scout who fired on the US patrol is in Pakistani custody, the US spokeswoman said.

A government official told AFP on condition of anonymity that there was an exchange of fire between the US and Pakistani forces, and that two border scouts were injured.

He said tension had been brewing for several days between the two sides at the border over the Pakistani post.

"The coalition forces were taunting Pakistani scouts that the post they had set up was inside Afghan territory," the official said.

"A scout had a nasty fight with some members of coalition forces and returned to his base and fired at the coalition patrol.

"There was exchange of fire in which two scouts were injured. This was not a big incident but purely a localised affair."

rj/bc/pch

US-attacks-Pakistan

14 posted on 01/03/2003 2:53:07 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: *southasia_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
15 posted on 01/03/2003 2:55:07 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Why do you think it seceded ? Because politicians tell you to think that ? The purpose was to kill the enemy. The enemy escaped in droves. We killed very very few.

It was a failure that will come back to haunt us just like letting Sadam go in the first Gulf War came back to haunt us.
16 posted on 01/03/2003 2:55:33 PM PST by stalin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
thanks for the education.
17 posted on 01/03/2003 2:57:03 PM PST by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stalin
Problem is deploying 100,000 troops on the other side of the planet takes a very long time. You've got two choices in war: fast action with small units, prolonged setup time for large units (if we could have even gotten one of the border nations to let us stage that many troops). If we'd have gone the big unit rout action wouldn't have been able to start until at least February of 2002, which would have given the bad guys that much more time to prepare, and that much more time to launch massive terrorist attacks on us while hiding in a sovereign nation. How we did things wasn't perfect, but no plan is.
18 posted on 01/03/2003 3:01:28 PM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: milestogo
Shades of Loaos & Cambodia...
NO SAFE AREAS FOR OUR ENEMIES...not mosques... not accross borders...not in schools..or baby milk factories..
flatten and forget
19 posted on 01/03/2003 3:01:54 PM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
No need for any such stuff as that, just stand at the ready and let India squash them like a bug! After they dust themselves off and decontaminate their country or whats left of it, they might be more willing to listen to The U.S.!
20 posted on 01/03/2003 3:03:28 PM PST by wharfrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson