Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sheltonmac
It's the same three-step process every time: 1) liberals make the accusation of racism against a Republican, 2) the Republican denies the charge and 3) the Republican agrees to sign on to the liberal agenda, hoping that in doing so he might prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that he is not a racist. The entire fiasco surrounding Trent Lott is only the latest example of this kind of Republican cowardice.

Bingo!

But it's probably too late. The mob has spoken, and Trent Lott has been forced out of his leadership role. Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah summed up what Republicans expect of Bill Frist, Lott's successor: "I think Bill has a kind of a more moderate record and a more moderate approach toward things, and I think that it's going to be very difficult to criticize him."

I wonder if the same people who were calling for Lott to step down are also adimately pro-life? After all, Lott was going to bring up a partial birth abortion bill; somehow, I doubt that's first on Dr. Frist's agenda.

I don't want to hear any whinning on this site from any actions (or in actions) on the new Majority Leader's part; you all who were calling for Lott's head deserve what you get.

149 posted on 01/02/2003 8:49:23 AM PST by FourtySeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FourtySeven
"After all, Lott was going to bring up a partial birth abortion bill..."

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

You want to set the standard for the incoming SML based on what the outgoing one never got around to doing?

155 posted on 01/02/2003 8:54:05 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson