To: Blood of Tyrants
a magazine, I think Newsweek, had a major article about pot this year. It said that they tested today's pot and it isn't any stronger than pot was thirty years ago. The reports that pot is 12 times stronger now than 30 years ago is a LIE. Pot is pot. The article was a long one and worth reading. They also gave the good medicinal purposes for pot, THC. It was a very interesting article and I am much more positive about pot now after reading it.
15 posted on
01/02/2003 6:00:26 AM PST by
buffyt
To: buffyt
a magazine, I think Newsweek, had a major article about pot this year. It said that they tested today's pot and it isn't any stronger than pot was thirty years ago. Obvious Leftist propaganda! (/sarcasm)
At least that's what the drug warriors here will say.
To: buffyt
Actually, I think that doing drugs is stupid. And so is bungee jumping and playing your stereo so loud that it damages your hearing but I am not so anal as to try to pass a law preventing you from doing so.
To: buffyt
It said that they tested today's pot and it isn't any stronger than pot was thirty years ago. It's nice to have a test to verify it, but it's not necessary. 30 years ago, we had cannabis coming here from Columbia, Hawaii, Thailand and a number of other ocuntries that can grow it under the optimum conditions for potency and maintaining the genetic potency in seeds produced.
Now we have low potency domestic varieties from conditions that lower the potential in subsequent seeds. Cannabis is a plant susceptible to chemical changes in the genetic potential of its seeds; colchicine from the crocus colchicum autumal can alter its genetic potential.
If a danger has to be established by lies. . .
![](http://home.hiwaay.net/~wterrell/william.gif)
To: buffyt
The reports that pot is 12 times stronger now than 30 years ago is a LIE.I've read reports that sugar is 12 times stonger now than 30 years ago. /sarcasm
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson