No, I am not dancing around. A liberal constructionist would use the opportunity to re-write the law to suit his preferred outcome, even if there were no justification other than feelings of what's "fair." (Rather like the New Jersey Supreme Court and their wholesale overriding of New Jersey election law because they desired to let the Rats have a new candidate.)
I must say that you are being willfully obtuse. There are at least 5 replies explaining strict constructionism to you, but you keep changing the discussion...going from "how is he conservative" to "what's the difference between a strict constructinist vs. a liberal constructionist?"
It seems awfully much like you are trying to avoid saying you were wrong.
What's his stand on Hate Crime Laws?
What's his stand on Campaign Finance Reform?
What's his stand on Right To Work Laws?
I'm hearing crickets here. If he's going to be on the SC, we need to know these things.