I'm hearing crickets here. If he's going to be on the SC, we need to know these things.
I'm hearing crickets here. If he's going to be on the SC, we need to know these things.
No, we don't. You ask those things of candidates for the Legislative and Executive Branches, as they create laws. But since he might be a judicial nominee, I simply want to hear that he will impartially and impersonally interpret the law and rule according to the law, NOT HIS OWN PERSONAL POSITIONS ON THE ISSUES. You're succumbing to activist temptation, Hank.
No, we don't. His opinion on these matters is irrelevant if the justice is not trying to make new laws like the liberals ones have done.