[rwfromkansas]

Thanks for the info.....some others have set me straight also. It makes me angry that the media would lie like that when they know he did not vote against the law itself, just believed some more evidence was needed to determine whether this girl should be required to notify her parents or not.

[Lurking Libertarian]

he did not vote against the law itself, just believed some more evidence was needed to determine whether this girl should be required to notify her parents or not.

Actually, he voted that no more evidence was needed, and that the girl had in fact established that she did not need to notify her parents; he did not send the case back for further hearings. The opinion is linked in post #72.

[Dog Gone]

What's even more troubling is that some of the lies about this case come from "conservative" commentators. We like to think of ourselves as more honest than the media, but that's not always true.