[Lurking Libertarian]

he did not vote against the law itself, just believed some more evidence was needed to determine whether this girl should be required to notify her parents or not.

Actually, he voted that no more evidence was needed, and that the girl had in fact established that she did not need to notify her parents; he did not send the case back for further hearings. The opinion is linked in post #72.

[Dog Gone]

Actually, he voted that no more evidence was needed, and that the girl had in fact established that she did not need to notify her parents; he did not send the case back for further hearings.

You're right. They sent it back the first time it reached the court, and affirmed the new trial court ruling that granted the bypass in this final ruling.