[Congressman Billybob]

So to the New York Times the murder of Christians and Americans is a "negative reaction"? What bullsh*t. When the patient dies on the operating table, does the surgeon avoid responsibility by calling it a "negative patient outcome"?

We have Muslim "missionaries" operating in the United States, with their most fertile ground of operation being in prisons. Would we be justified in shooting such Muslims in the United States? Would the Times refer to such shootings here as a "negative reaction"?

Put the shoe on the other foot and see how it fits. It doesn't. Therefore, the Times is slime, in its "reporting."

Did I miss anything?

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest column on UPI, "Incision Decision in the Senate" (Not yet on UPI wire, or FR.)

As the politician formerly known as Al Gore has said, Buy my book, "to Restore Trust in America"

[twntaipan]

Nope, I'd say you about covered it all!