Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush snubs Prince Charles
Mail on Sunday ^ | December 29, 2002 | Johnathan Oliver

Posted on 12/29/2002 5:56:53 PM PST by ejdrapes

Bush to Charles: we don't want you in USA
by JOHNATHAN OLIVER | Mail on Sunday | 19th December 2002

Prince Charles has abandoned an official visit to the United States because the White House has signalled he is not welcome.

The snub by President Bush - which is causing a behind-the-scenes diplomatic furore both in London and Washington - has been prompted by the Prince's deeply held reservations about Bush's determination to wage war with Iraq.

The Mail on Sunday reveals today that senior figures in the Bush administration have indicated that it would be 'very unhelpful' for the planned royal visit to proceed.

They fear Charles's arrival will coincide with the start of a full-scale invasion of Iraq - and that the Prince's opposition to the war would cause huge embarrassment.

It is understood the trip has now been cancelled on the advice of British diplomats. A senior Whitehall official confirmed last night: 'A week-long tour was in the diary for February or March 2003. But the Prince has been politely informed his views on the current crisis might not go down well.'

And a Washington insider admitted: 'This would not be a desirable visit at a sensitive time like this.'

The Bush administration, said the Whitehall official, believes the Prince is vehemently against war. And the Foreign Office now fears his visit would be hijacked by US anti-war factions to drive a wedge between America and Britain and undermine Tony Blair's steadfastly pro-Washington stance.

Blair's policy is already being criticised within the Cabinet. International-Development Secretary Clare Short yesterday embarrassed Downing Street when she said: 'An all-out war that causes devastating suffering to the people of Iraq would be wrong.'

The Prince got on well with George W's father when he and former President George Bush recalled the Anglo-US wartime partnership six decades ago at the rededication of the American Air Museum in Cambridgeshire last September.

But it is now clear that the people Charles was due to meet at the White House, including President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, do not want to listen to his anti-war message. Nor do they trust Charles to toe the Washington line when confronted by the world's media.

Downing Street shared Washington's reservations and it is understood that the Foreign Office told the Prince of President Bush's concerns.

'The Foreign Office organises these trips with St James's Palace,' said a royal aide. 'It has been very negative about this tour after consultations with Washington.

'The fact is that British public opinion is divided on this issue. Neither Washington nor Downing Street wants the Prince to reflect that.'

Prince Charles, who has been an outspoken advocate of tolerance towards Islam - he recently held high-profile meetings with the British Muslim community and famously promised to defend all faiths on acceding to the Throne - has never publicly expressed antiwar views. Openly attacking Government policy would provoke a constitutional crisis.

However, privately he believes an attack on Iraq would lead to a devastating and permanent rift between the West and the Islamic world.

Charles believes his views mirror those of the British people - a majority of whom oppose war on Iraq.

His position also echoes the sentiments of Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams who, in his Christmas broadcast, made a thinly veiled attack on Tony Blair's determination to wage war on Saddam.

In the spring, Charles usually pays a high-profile foreign visit and was said to have been particularly looking forward to America.

His last trip there six years ago was virtually ignored by the US media which gave an ecstatic reception to his ex-wife, Diana, Princess of Wales, who made a solo visit the same year.

Subsequent tours had been pencilled in but were cancelled after the September 11 outrage and again after the Queen Mother's death.

Iraq is not the only issue which would have caused friction between the Prince and his American hosts. Charles has made no secret of his loathing of the 'Wild West' free-market capitalism favoured by Bush.

'Business is at a crossroads,' said the Prince on his previous US visit. 'Does it enter new markets like the cowboys of the frontier? Or does it take a rather more sophisticated approach which leads to continued rather than short-term profit?'

A spokeswoman for St James's Palace said: 'The Prince goes on two major tours annually. The places that he goes to are decided by the Foreign Office. It is not our decision.'

A Foreign Office spokesman said: 'We cannot confirm the Prince's plans so far ahead of time.'


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 12/29/2002 5:56:53 PM PST by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Stay home Chaz, you limp wristed punk or the Queen will beat you like a red headed step child.
2 posted on 12/29/2002 6:03:41 PM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Perhaps if we dressed up Saddam to look like a fox? Or told the Prince that Saddam was destroying Iraq's historic architecture in favor of modern buildings?
3 posted on 12/29/2002 6:05:34 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Perhaps it would be best for His Princliness to come at a time when we colonials weren't looking forward to having a go at the wogs.

Might be a bit of a sticky wicket and all that...

Another time?

And do bring Cammie!

4 posted on 12/29/2002 6:05:45 PM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage
Stay home Chaz, you limp wristed punk or the Queen will beat you like a red headed step child.

BWAHAHAHA..AAARRRRRGGGHHHH!...Spit all over the place...the room and computer are a mess!.....BWAHAHAHAHA!...Lord have mercy!

5 posted on 12/29/2002 6:19:18 PM PST by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
You may ascribe any scenario you wish: the truth is we cannot risk C pirouetting around in a skirt on W's ranch here in Texas.

Asking to tour the Capital thusly garbed.

6 posted on 12/29/2002 6:22:28 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
A lot of people think the Prince Charles is the anitchrist.
7 posted on 12/29/2002 6:22:44 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

Prince Charles, seen here on the right with his girlfriend Camilla, was not available for immediate comment. He was too busy out not working once again as he has done every day of his life. But he may again speak out as an "expert" on "business" and "markets" since he has run so many busineeses. Well, not really. But once Charles sold a polo mallet all by himself and he has known to purchase his own dinner from time to time. "I even calculated the tip! Twice!" Said Charles.

8 posted on 12/29/2002 6:27:33 PM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Brush snubs Princed Charles. (sigh) And yet somehow life goes on....
9 posted on 12/29/2002 6:27:44 PM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
Too funny. I think the guy who drives his own truck around his ranch in Texas might not have a whole lot in common with the guy who wants to come back in his next life as a tampon. Just a guess, though.
10 posted on 12/29/2002 6:29:49 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Prince Charles, who has been an outspoken advocate of tolerance towards Islam - he recently held high-profile meetings with the British Muslim community and famously promised to defend all faiths ...........

Yeah, not to mention his EX was killed with one
11 posted on 12/29/2002 6:31:22 PM PST by YOMO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake
the truth is we cannot risk C pirouetting around in a skirt on W's ranch here in Texas.

It would make the sheep ENTIRELY TOO nervous!!! :o)

12 posted on 12/29/2002 6:32:53 PM PST by Free State Four
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
"...the guy who wants to come back in his next life as a tampon..."

There are certain things that shouldn't be admitted publicly...

And this was one of them.

13 posted on 12/29/2002 6:34:57 PM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
The anti-christ will be charismatic. Surely that lets Prince Charles off the hook.
14 posted on 12/29/2002 6:35:30 PM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Charles is the sort of swishy, inbred, effete fool that results from having a family tree with no branches.

What a spineless little weasel.

With luck, the British public will end the monarchy in my lifetime, and those losers will have to get real jobs.

15 posted on 12/29/2002 6:39:22 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
BREAKING NEWS - "President Bush Cancels Sean Penn White House Visit."

Tell Dorky to take his opinions where they may get some attention...Oprah.

16 posted on 12/29/2002 6:44:51 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
ROFLMBO!!!!!
17 posted on 12/29/2002 6:47:41 PM PST by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
This guy and his family are the ultimate "welfare" bums of the world...

I'd probably have trouble scheduling a visit with George and I have no doubt that my opinions would be more valid to the White House than some guy who does nothing for a living except spend other people's money...
18 posted on 12/29/2002 6:54:47 PM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
This country has had a thing against royalty in general, and the British royalty in particular, for the last, oh, 240 years or so. Some things haven't changed, this being one of them.
19 posted on 12/29/2002 6:58:42 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
BRAVO!!!
20 posted on 12/29/2002 7:00:02 PM PST by Porterville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson