a biblical case can be built that any sexual activity other than heterosexual intercourse is immoral. A case can be built that any sexual activity other than heterosexual intercourse is biologically wrong. ( A man was designed to 'fit' into only one place on a woman. Only that place is designed with the proper characteristics to recieve a man). Therefore these same acts can be called unnatural.
I agree.
But my point was that natural and normal sexual intercourse which is by God's design and completely moral does not necesssarily always produce offspring.
Therefore the argument that homosexuality is wrong simply because it is not procreative, is not by itself enough of a reason to call it immoral.
We need to add that homosexuality is wrong because it violates both God's biological design and His created intent for sexuality.
We need to add that homosexuality is wrong because it violates both God's biological design and His created intent for sexuality.
Agreed. But when discussing with the godless libertines a biblically based argument doesn't hold too much weight. They quickly revert to sticking their fingers in their ears and screaming "I can't hear you" so I try to keep to biological/physiological arguments when I can.
I know the truth, you know the truth, everyone deep down knows the truth, but some people refuse to let go of their sin long enough to accept that what they know deep down may actually be true. Why do those who practice homosexuality loathe themselves? because they know it's wrong.
GSA(P)