[martian_22]

I dunno... I thought the 2ndA. was one of the "untouchable" individual rights that weren't subject to interpretation and compromise.

If they could be possibley tired of all the bickering and surrender to a "settlement", somebody's agenda/conditioning worked.

Now we have to "hope" for a "good or bad decision".

No sir. 'Don't like it one bit....

[Shooter 2.5]

Personally, I think the libs are trying to rush a decision before Bush appoints more conservatives to the Court.

[sneakypete]

Now we have to "hope" for a "good or bad decision".

Not really. I'm going to keep my guns regardless of how they rule. If they rule against individual rights,they are wrong,and no man is obligated to follow a wrong law. Personally,I don't think the Supremes will touch it.