Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The USS George Washington is heading to Gulf within 96 Hours.
Fox News | 12/27/02

Posted on 12/27/2002 10:04:44 AM PST by Sparta

The USS George Washington has been put on the alert and told to prepare to deploy within 96 hours to the Persian Gulf. Developing....


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-449 next last
To: CougarGA7
That's probably true... in peacetime.
121 posted on 12/27/2002 10:55:15 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
You are missing something. I think they scheduled this as they needed restocking of supplies, and were hoping they could have a longer time before redeploying.

In addition, it was pointed out earlier in the thread that you can load sensitive items without as much observation when you are in a home port.

122 posted on 12/27/2002 10:55:31 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Sparta

'He hath loosed the fateful power of his terrible swift sword'

123 posted on 12/27/2002 10:55:54 AM PST by TonyInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
This administration is speaking loudly and carrying a big stick. It's the only thing mad dicatators understand; notwithstanding pHillary wanting to "talk" with them ...
124 posted on 12/27/2002 10:56:02 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: relee
We have no choice. Pyongyang has cast the die. The moves they've made this week (and the incendiary rhetoric) fly in the face of all "acceptable" maneuvering. The admission of nuclear capability was one step. If they left it there, perhaps we could have saved face and dealt down to a point where they would agree to dismantle operations for some financial assistance (bitter pill for us, though it would be). Instead, they started shipping SCUDS to Iraq. Now they are demanding a non-agression treaty (impossible), and threatening to destroy the world. With the likelihood these gorillas can produce a simple atomic bomb within a month (according to British scientists), we are forced to take action.

One positive byproduct of this situation is that it may force the U.S. to throw off the yoke of the U.N. and take unilateral action. One can appreciate the reluctance to create a pre-emptive strike precedence, but we are dealing with lunatics and zealots who have openly professed a desire to destroy us.

A Washington insider, whom I spoke to over Christmas, told me that Iraq is foregone -- that the Bush team is expertly putting on the good cop/bad cop charade between Powell and Rumsfeld while they are setting the table for a quick and decisive victory in Iraq. He says Powell has been taking the heat for putting forth the diplomatic drive, but in essence he has been an a good soldier throughout.

Given their penchant for getting all their ducks in a row, one would have to assume a contingency for Korea has been on the table for some time. So if something is going to go down (like a nuclear reactor), we have to be confident that the Bush White House is going to do everthing in their power to make this go away in an effective manner. It's potentially bloody, but this is crunchtime for the free world. If the U.N. wants to fall on it's plastic sword and be run roughshod by a bunch of Cretins, so be it, but when it comes down to it, we're going to do what we need to in order to survive...

125 posted on 12/27/2002 10:56:34 AM PST by Dirk McQuickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
They are just "preparing to stand by" as we used to say in the offshore oil bidness.
126 posted on 12/27/2002 10:56:35 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Was that carrier the Truman????

I don't know. He said:

96 hours alert for:

GW battle group
Marine Amphibous ready group
USNS Comfort in Baltimore is activated

also

Air Force combat command has received prepare to deploy orders
and
Another carrier may get put on alert soon (this week)

127 posted on 12/27/2002 10:57:10 AM PST by relee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I'm not sure "blunder" is the most apt word.

Maybe something like . . .

The NK's will rush insanely headlong into a devastatingly suicidal mad dog attack at the urging of their megalomaniacal excuse for a leader.

IMHO.
128 posted on 12/27/2002 10:58:31 AM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Dirk McQuickly
I hope you are right. Sometimes I see genius in Bush, and sometimes, I just don't know. Maybe that is part of the genius.
129 posted on 12/27/2002 10:58:43 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
North Korea puts banned guns on South border (in violation of an armistice accord)

130 posted on 12/27/2002 10:59:54 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I wonder where that SCUD shipment we intercepted was really going..
131 posted on 12/27/2002 10:59:58 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
Glad to see it is an old story. I was flipping through the channels and it caught my eye since I hadn't heard it before.
132 posted on 12/27/2002 11:00:24 AM PST by relee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Dog
MH all joking aside....I am afraid the NK's are going to blunder into a war.

You aren't the only one. It was bad enough looking at Iraq. But this changes the dynamic entirely. Pretty damned sobering if'n you ask me...

133 posted on 12/27/2002 11:00:25 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
How long does a ship of this magnitude usually stay in port at home once it does return?

Six Months

Why not just leave it over there, if they are going to turn it around this quickly? There will hardly be time to get it cleaned up, get all the toilets cleaned out and the needed repairs and repainting done, or am I missing something?

There were a one to two thousand men on the ships in the Battle Group whose enlistments were up and needed to be discharged. Their replacements needed to be brought aboard.

It's good for morale to let the crew have Christmas at home when possible.

A ship ordinarily takes six months to do repairs and work up for durty with it's new crew before deploying, but they can operate for years in fast turnaround with delayed maintainance.

So9

134 posted on 12/27/2002 11:00:43 AM PST by Servant of the Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Dog
We'll never know. (In public that is)
135 posted on 12/27/2002 11:00:45 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Dirk McQuickly
A Washington insider, whom I spoke to over Christmas, told me that Iraq is foregone -- that the Bush team is expertly putting on the good cop/bad cop charade between Powell and Rumsfeld while they are setting the table for a quick and decisive victory in Iraq. He says Powell has been taking the heat for putting forth the diplomatic drive, but in essence he has been an a good soldier throughout.

It has always been my opinion that Powell is playing the good cop to Rummy's bad cop. When people start whinning about his diplomatic approach they should remember what Powell is, a General. That means he understands that he serves at the pleasure of his commanding officer, the president. Nothing Powell does is done without the explicit approval of the president. It is as simple as that.

136 posted on 12/27/2002 11:00:52 AM PST by The Vast Right Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: relee
96 hour alert... this is it. I think everybody senses it.

137 posted on 12/27/2002 11:02:13 AM PST by FBD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: relee
Another carrier may get put on alert soon (this week)

I would bet money that would be the aforementioned USS Truman.

138 posted on 12/27/2002 11:02:45 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
it is smaller and the only non-nuke carrier in the fleet.

The Constellation is still in the Pacific Fleet, and still conventional.

So9

139 posted on 12/27/2002 11:03:02 AM PST by Servant of the Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Nine
I stand corrected. Didn't know the constellation was still active.
140 posted on 12/27/2002 11:04:04 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson