Skip to comments.
Now that human cloning's apparently upon us, is immortality as well? (My title)
CNN.com ^
| Dec. 27th, 2002
| CNN.com
Posted on 12/27/2002 6:21:32 AM PST by End The Hypocrisy
A major announcement regarding human cloning is supposedly underway.
Related article:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2002-12-27-baby-clone_x.htm
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: brain; cloning; fountainofyouth; immortality; medicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-195 next last
To: End The Hypocrisy
We may have the distinction of belonging to the last generation to die of old age.
Happy New Year.
To: End The Hypocrisy
transfer one's brain's memory lobes Memory might not be located in the lobes. Besides that, even with immortality, the average lifetime would be about 600 years anyway.
To: End The Hypocrisy
Do you guys actually believe this? Do you think God would allow this?
83
posted on
12/27/2002 10:29:21 AM PST
by
YadaYada
To: End The Hypocrisy
To: YadaYada
>>>Do you think God would allow this?<<<
After Auschwitz, who can guess accurately?
To: RightWhale
>>>even with immortality, the average lifetime would be about 600 years anyway.<<<
Why so?
To: YadaYada
It's not even that close. This is a new twist, alien TV evangelism. The "grace" period of a week or more will be used to bilk the weak of mind.
To: RGSpincich
To: pabianice
>>>We may have the distinction of belonging to the last generation to die of old age.<<<
Hopefully anatomy won't be destiny for us, either, though...
To: End The Hypocrisy
People die in accidents or of sudden disease or while fighting. Even with immortality it would be possible to catch cold or hit a bridge abutment or have a war.
To: RightWhale
Perhaps one's memories can be saved on a database, along with one's DNA (a la The Sixth Day) so that one can be cloned in case one dies, and essentially revived?
To: RGSpincich
To: End The Hypocrisy
It is not known where the memory resides, or even if it resides somewhere. These are very interesting areas of speculation, but we are [one might assume] far from a technology that can transfer memories.
To: RightWhale
It is not known where the memory resides, or even if it resides somewhere. Are we speaking of software or hardware? If it is hardware, can the hardware be faithfully replicated. If it is software, where does the conscious mind reside?
The consequences of either are paradoxical. If hardware, who would be the real conscious "me" among a group of clones? If software, who would be the real conscious "me" among a group of "machines" running the same software? Who gets to be "me"?
94
posted on
12/27/2002 11:49:52 AM PST
by
AndrewC
To: End The Hypocrisy
Better yet, offer a selection of programs approved by the state; yeah, that's it, peace innertime.
To: AndrewC
Who gets to be "me"? Such have been the questions of Sci-Fi. But now we are moving beyond Sci-Fi. Cloning of humans is happening. One today, another next month, a series after that, more and more clones and still no preparation in the areas of ethics and of the law. Looks like we will deal with the problems as they arise, as usual.
For memory, I like the idea of the Akashic level combined with the 5-dimensional ekpyrotic universe model where the size of the 5th dimension is roughly the size of a neuron, but how can we account for taste?
To: End The Hypocrisy
The short answer to your question about memory transplants is ... no. Not only is it not currently possible, the question can't even be properly asked.
97
posted on
12/27/2002 12:19:22 PM PST
by
js1138
To: RGSpincich
OJ walked in spite of DNA evidence. OJ walked because the jurors hated and distrusted the police. Science had nothing to do with their decision.
98
posted on
12/27/2002 12:22:00 PM PST
by
js1138
To: js1138
>>>>Not only is [memory transfer] not currently possible, the question can't even be properly asked.<<<
If somebody on this thread called that "pseudo philosophy" I'd be hard-pressed to defend it, so hopefully folks will refrain.
To: RightWhale
It is not known where the memory resides, or even if it resides somewhere. These are very interesting areas of speculation, but we are [one might assume] far from a technology that can transfer memories. Wherever the memory "resides" it is co-resident with the structure of the brain, and all its unique interconnections. The most common speculation would say there is no separation of software and hareware.
100
posted on
12/27/2002 12:25:40 PM PST
by
js1138
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-195 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson