Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pyongyang may have A-bomb in 30 days
The Times ^ | December 27, 2002 | Anthony Browne

Posted on 12/27/2002 4:13:58 AM PST by MadIvan

RESTARTING its nuclear reactor could enable North Korea to produce nuclear weapons in as little as 30 days, according to one of Britain’s leading nuclear experts.

John Large, who has worked with the Royal Navy, advised Russia on the sunken nuclear submarine Kursk, and is on the UK Nuclear Co-ordinating Group, said that North Korea’s only motive for restarting the reactor was to produce nuclear weapons.

The North Koreans moved 1,000 fresh fuel rods containing uranium to the Yongbyon nuclear reactor yesterday, saying that they wanted to restart it to produce electricity.

The move comes just a week after they unilaterally disabled monitoring equipment and seals put in place by the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency under a 1994 deal with the US in which North Korea promised to stop its nuclear programme in return for supplies of oil.

Pyongyang said that it needed the electricity to compensate for the US suspension of oil shipments after North Korea admitted in October that it was still trying to develop nuclear weapons. The reactor will need a total of 8,000 fresh fuel rods before it can be restarted.

However, Yongbyon produces only 5 megawatts of thermal power, which once converted to electricity and transmitted to cities would be only about 2 megawatts compared with the 1,300 megawatts produced by Sizewell B.

“It’s absolutely nothing, it wouldn’t be of any use, it could just power a few villages,” Dr Large said. There were three possible reasons why they could want to restart the reactor, he said, and each of them would lead to the production of nuclear weapons.

The electricity from the reactor could be used to power a nuclear reprocessing plant also at the Yongbyon complex, enabling the North Koreans to process chemically the 8,000 spent fuel rods that had powered the reactor before it was shut down in 1994.

The North Koreans also dismantled monitoring equipment at the reprocessing plant, which has the facility to separate the spent fuel rods into depleted uranium, and a mixture of plutonium and americium.

That plutonium mixture could be used to produce an atomic bomb within six months to a year. The 8,000 spent fuel rods would produce a minimum of 30kg of plutonium, enough to make seven nuclear weapons.

However, the North Koreans may not have the facilities to handle the americium, which is particularly dangerous, and so may be using the reactor to produce “fresh” uncontaminated plutonium. In that case it would take nine months to a year to produce an atomic bomb.

The third, and most worrying, scenario is that the North Koreans might already have enough plutonium for an atomic bomb, but do not have a nuclear trigger for it.

The UN has never been able to verify how much plutonium the country produced before the reactor was shut down in 1994. Some analysts have speculated that it might have kept enough for two atomic bombs.

In this case North Korea might be restarting the nuclear reactor to produce a “polonium trigger” needed to ignite a nuclear explosion. This would enable it to produce a functioning nuclear weapon within just 30 days.

“All scenarios point to the finishing of the development of nuclear weapons,” Dr Large said. “When you have started producing plutonium, you are reaching the culmination of producing the weapons.”

North Korea’s unstable Stalinist regime has also spent recent years developing a long range missile that would enable it to send bombs as far as Japan. “North Korea has a nuclear weapons development programme on an industrial scale, and the means for delivering them.

“It brings the whole of South-East Asia into political instability,” Dr Large said.

With the collapse of the 1994 deal to stop it producing nuclear weapons, North Korea’s neighbours are left hoping that intense diplomatic efforts can bring the renegade country back in line. “We can never go along with North Korea’s nuclear weapons development,” the outgoing South Korean President, Kim Dae Jung, said yesterday.

“We must closely co- operate with the United States, Japan and other friendly countries to prevent the situation from further deteriorating into a crisis.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: atomicbomb; kimjongil; northkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: MadIvan; Poohbah; section9; Miss Marple; Dog; mwl1
We gotta take those reactors out. We simply have to.

Then, the diplomats at State will have to buy enough time to get the only platforms capable of taking out Yongbyong back into active service:


21 posted on 12/27/2002 5:36:34 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I see China's behind this. Korea is ejecting UN nuclear inspectors as a sign of disrespecting the UN. This way China gets across the point that it's not just the US that can denigrate and ignore the UN. Ammunition is given to the peaceniks who say it's all about oil. That's why we go after Iraq instead of Korea. On a strategic level this makes the US devote mental energy to Korea just when it's about to go to war with Iraq. Who knows what stunts N Korea will pull once we strike Iraq?

China's invisible hand. Who benefits from Korea's latest actions?
22 posted on 12/27/2002 5:37:45 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

I've got to tell you ...I am only a few hundred miles south of Korea in Kumamoto , Japan ...And I am gettin' scared ...My daughter , 14 , keeps asking me if we are going to be bombed , and I assure her that they'd never bomb us here in the Kyushu hinterland ...but they might go for Sasebo and Nagasaki which aren't far away . Holy moley !
23 posted on 12/27/2002 5:39:58 AM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Sorry, your best bet is GBU-28s. The 16-inch round does not have enough penetration to take down deep underground facilities.
24 posted on 12/27/2002 5:42:24 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I think it's an unavoidable fact of life that we, meaning Britain and the USA, will have to confront North Korea, like we did together during the Korean War. I suggest that this time we blast them to hell.

And sooner rather than later.

They remind me of a horrid little dwarf, standing in front of one's house, screaming obscenities and exposing themself and pissing on the flower beds every morning.

One's patience fades, and one day, one picks up a heavy object and does the right thing. Their clumsy attempts at blackmail and extortion, successful and encouraged by the last, disasterous Clinton administration, deliberately creating crises in order to be paid off, is the most recent lesson in the failure of appeasment to dictators. Especially looney ones.

25 posted on 12/27/2002 5:45:30 AM PST by Gorzaloon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
The North Vietnamese lost a command post similarly built to Yongbyong to th New Jersey's 16" guns.
26 posted on 12/27/2002 5:46:37 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Strike first. If they respond by unleashing an artillery barrage on Seoul, nuke 'em unmercifully. We should've listened to the Founding Fathers about foreign entanglements.
27 posted on 12/27/2002 5:49:27 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Probably shallower burial and a lot less concrete.

There's another problem: actually HITTING Yongbon. The 16-inch guns have a truly evil reuptation for putting shells anywhere but onto the target after the Navy blended ALL of the remaining powder into one common lot.

28 posted on 12/27/2002 5:50:36 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
We gotta figure something out then...

Believe me, this is getting uglier than Rosie O'Donnell's face REAL FAST.
29 posted on 12/27/2002 5:54:09 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"This "useless" reactor was the product of the agreement that Clinton made."

I thought that I read that this particular (plutonium breeder) reactor was a Russian gift from back before the USSR went out of business. Part of Clinton's deal was that we would build them 2 (much less useful for weapons)light water reactors in exchange for shutting down this reactor. I'm not sure whether we ever did build them. I'm far from a Clinton fan, but his agreement was aimed at getting rid of this reactor. The story the past few days is he had a plan to blow it up if necessary. Wonder what his supporters will say if the current President does just that? I hope we find out (although I expect they will howl in criticism).
30 posted on 12/27/2002 5:55:35 AM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Either he is a traitor or a hopeless incompetent, or both.

But, wouldn't the combination of hopeless incompetence with treason be good? ;^)

31 posted on 12/27/2002 6:02:56 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
Not to be too alarming, but you really should have an evacuation plan for you and your family in place, and have your most important valuables, passport, traveler's checks, etc. ready in some boxes.

Americans in Kuwait,Saudi Arabia and Israel are on such a standby contingency. I see the need for this spreading to Americans in the ROK and Japan.

At any rate, just do it, (if you haven't yet) but then don't dwell on it because the odds are so huge you wont' need it, but it will help to have it for peace of mind sake. If not military, register with the US Embassy so they can get any continency word to you such as advisories, orders, etc.

As per routing, you might consider going to a South East Asia country, such as Thailand, and then using cheap flights to get out of there through Europe, etc, through Okinawa, etc. as I would imagine Narita in Tokyo would be a mad house.

32 posted on 12/27/2002 6:16:39 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
My mom and I (when I was a little kid) had to get out of Japan in a few weeks notice. We sailed out of Yokohama on an MSTS ship called the Darby.
33 posted on 12/27/2002 6:32:48 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I bet we can get one there in 30 minutes if we tried!!
34 posted on 12/27/2002 8:11:44 AM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
What is this? British Intelligence trying to start WW III? A few facts are missing from this article:

1. American "anything-for-a-buck" companies were trying to sell nuclear equipment to the North Koreans as recently as a year ago.

2. North Korea is responding to an oil embargo by the west.

3. If China is behind all this, why are Chinese prison-labor products flooding into American stores?

Yes, North Korea is a horribly backwards, sick Stalinist nation, but people had better get their facts straight before missiles start flying all over Asia.

35 posted on 12/27/2002 10:26:46 AM PST by lafayette76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lafayette76
3. If China is behind all this, why are Chinese prison-labor products flooding into American stores?

The answer to this one is simple. China likes the Yankee cash and it undermines our economy.

36 posted on 12/27/2002 10:35:20 AM PST by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Well, they're not getting into America without *someone's* blessing. At the very least, Washington D.C. is failing to protect Americans against economic warfare.
37 posted on 12/27/2002 10:39:55 AM PST by lafayette76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lafayette76
2. North Korea is responding to an oil embargo by the west.

No oil embargo. We are no longer supplying them with free oil. We are not keeping them from buying their own oil. BIG DIFFERENCE.

38 posted on 12/27/2002 11:14:30 AM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
Wow....hang in there, sushi. Not to scare you more, but maybe you should think about taking your daughter and getting the hell out of there before things really begin to escalate. We'll all be thinking of you.......
39 posted on 12/27/2002 11:27:16 AM PST by Morrigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron
You are correct. An oil company was getting enough American taxpayer money to provide "foreign aid" (i.e. extortion money) to the tune of 500,000 metric tons of fuel oil per year, which apparently was twice what their civilian economy could use. But given the state of their economy, the cut-off of oil is effectively an embargo, and I'm sure that's how they (the mentally ill North Korean regime) view things.
40 posted on 12/27/2002 12:36:59 PM PST by lafayette76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson