Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Pelosi in a Lott of Trouble
Washington Prowler ^ | 12/27/2002 12:05:00 AM

Posted on 12/26/2002 10:56:14 PM PST by mjp

"What Pelosi's done is worse that what Lott did," says a member of the Congressional Black Caucus. "She said she was with us, then stabbed us in the back. I believe Lott when he says his mistake was of the mind not the heart. But I look at Pelosi's error and I know it was made by both. I really believe that. She had a conscious choice and she made the one that hurt us. Aside from losing the majority, this is the saddest chapter in my time in the House."

He's referring to House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi's decision -- made public earlier this week at the height of the Trent Lott drama on the other side of Capitol Hill -- to place longtime liberal ally Robert Matsui in charge of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. In that role, Matsui will be the key Democrat in the House to recruit candidates, fundraise for the party and help shape the party's message in the 2004 election cycle.

A member of the California delegation, Matsui never campaigned for the leadership post, was never mentioned as a candidate and has never served in leadership in a congressional career that many inside his party consider marginal.

Pelosi's decision to elevate Matsui shocked Black Caucus members, who had been privately assured by Pelosi lieutenants that their candidate for the DCCC job, Bill Jefferson of Louisiana, was a serious contender for the job.

"There is no evidence that they ever seriously considered Bill," says the Black Caucus member. "If our leadership doesn't think we have juice to make their lives hard, then they are wrong."

Jefferson, himself a relatively unknown Democrat, had in the past two election cycles shown a willingness and talent for fundraising and campaigning for his House colleagues. But early in his announced candidacy for the DCCC post, rivals pushed a story that Jefferson had failed to repay past campaign debts. Many suspect Pelosi operatives of making the leak in an attempt to diminish his chances, thus making her decision easier. But allies of Jefferson say he proved his mettle by playing a key role in the re-election of Sen. Mary Landrieu.

"He campaigned tirelessly for her in that final week," says a House member who supported Jefferson. "When Landrieu needed the African-American vote more than ever, Jefferson was one of the men who pulled it out for her. He deserved better than he got."

Pelosi's decision to elevate Matsui surprised many in the party, and raised new concerns about her leadership. "She had an opportunity to show America our party was the real big tent, that we could see past color and recognize talent and hard work. She failed. Matsui is nothing but a liberal from California, a crony," says the Jefferson supporter. "I hate to say it, but the Black Caucus is probably right. Given the times, the circumstances, Pelosi's actions are probably worse than Lott's."

More troubling to more moderate House members, though, was Pelosi's seeming uninterest in listening to her caucus's concerns. "She just ignored everything we were telling her, and just rewarded a pal," says the Jefferson backer. "When you are in the majority and on top, you can do that. We don't have that luxury. Maybe she's been listening too much to her old pal Willie Brown."

Brown, who is black, is currently mayor of San Francisco and has long been a political ally of Pelosi. "That's what makes this whole thing so stunningly embarrassing for her," says a Pelosi staffer. "It's not like she isn't aware of how important it would be to elevate an African-American into the leadership. She's seen examples of that importance throughout her career, and she still made this decision."

According to Pelosi supporters, she considered Jefferson, but ruled him out early in the process. "He just wasn't the right man for the job," says a Democratic leadership staffer. "We're in crisis mode. We needed someone in the slot who understood Pelosi, and who understood the party needs. I don't think anyone thought Jefferson was right for the job. In this environment, we just couldn't say it."

But is Matsui any more qualified than Jefferson? "I don't know," says the leadership staffer. "But if the Black Caucus is complaining about Pelosi not picking a person of color, and that seems to be their only complaint, they're being just as closed-minded as they claim Pelosi is. I mean, Matsui is a person of color."

Leading up to Pelosi's pick of Matsui, several candidates were rumored: Jefferson, Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey and Rep. Martin Frost. Frost, who lost out to Pelosi in the race for party leader, and who is far more moderate politically, had previously served as DCCC chair and is considered one of the House's best fundraisers. Moderates and some Pelosi allies had pushed her to bring Frost on board to help heal the rift between the liberal and moderate wings of the party.

But Pelosi passed on Frost, and Markey removed himself from contention early in the process, which left Jefferson as the only announced candidate seeking the post. Despite her limited options, Pelosi took a pass on Jefferson as well to go with one of her California friends.

"Now she's saying the party will find some other way to get us into leadership," says the Black Caucus member. "But we know that's just talk. You know, we didn't get along well with [Republican Rep. J.C.] Watts. But I'll say this for the Republicans: they gave him a leadership position without blinking. My party can't say that, and it saddens me."

Compounding Pelosi's apparently impolitic behavior -- and further angering the Black Caucus -- was her decision to announce the Matsui selection at the height of the Trent Lott controversy. "Look, if Bush can make controversial or negative announcements during big-news periods that distract the American public, we can too," says the Democratic leadership staffer. "I just don't think any of us saw the irony in what we did."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cannibalizingrats; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: yoe
I don’t know whether this bill passed or not, however, isn’t this typical of socialist/liberal thinking...give a person more so he is obliged to do less.

Someone on another thread suggested making the extended benefits sort of like a loan and subject to being paid back. Wanna see how quickly those folks happen to miraculously find work?

41 posted on 12/27/2002 6:45:55 AM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
HA-ha!

Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

42 posted on 12/27/2002 6:46:14 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The democrat party survives by keeping African-Americans in perpetual servitude

The Democrat party is racist to its core.

43 posted on 12/27/2002 6:48:48 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; mafree; rdb3
I know you have been pinged to this but I didn't want you to miss it.

Just what the doctor ordered...a ringside seat!

44 posted on 12/27/2002 6:50:26 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mjp
" "He just wasn't the right man for the job," says a Democratic leadership staffer. "We're in crisis mode. We needed someone in the slot who understood Pelosi, and who understood the party needs. I don't think anyone thought Jefferson was right for the job. In this environment, we just couldn't say it."

Admitting they are in crisis mode! That's when they get really rabid and crazy.

They will do anything to keep themselves in power - no matter who they hurt. In the next election they will pay the flunkies for their votes as they call upon the blacks to go out and 'GET THE VOTE'.

Of course - they always get it and things return to the normal routine of running the Plantation until the next election.

45 posted on 12/27/2002 6:50:26 AM PST by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mjp
The Democrats love blacks as a voting block but despise them as individuals. In the recent election, the Democrats rather then giving a black, Alan Page, an opportunity to make a name for himself selected a known loser, the DNC pulled the rug from under McCall and Democrats quickly closed the door on Representative Ford.

I believe most of the fury about Lott was to divert the attention of the blacks from the actions of the Democrats to the words of a single Senator.

46 posted on 12/27/2002 6:51:51 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp
Once again it is morning in America.

And once again Blacks awaken to the reality of what "respect" means to a liberal Democrat.

And once again Blacks won't get it. (Double entendre intended)

47 posted on 12/27/2002 6:53:26 AM PST by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp
The Dem position: Please be quiet, you uppity Negroes; just vote for us and sit in the back of the bus where you belong; when we want you for something, we will let you know. Sincerely, the Dem Leadership.
48 posted on 12/27/2002 6:55:43 AM PST by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Damn. First one didn't come through. I didn't check the other browser first. [shrug]
49 posted on 12/27/2002 6:57:53 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mhking; rdb3; Miss Marple; Poohbah; section9; Dog; JohnHuang2; mwl1
The slection of Matsui is a boon for us, bot not because of the infighting - the infighting is mere gravy. Matsui's stock in trade from 2001 on - at least his attack style, has been to demagouge Social Security. In other words, scare the old folks.

Refresh my memory, folks, but hasn't Social Security reform been a winning issue for Republicans in 2000 and 2002? Bush, Sununu, Liddy Dole, and a few others campaigned on it and won. We're in good shape on this - and if Matsui fights on this ground - we'll clean his clock.
50 posted on 12/27/2002 7:01:50 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BaBaStooey
Democrats have not elevated minorities to substantial leadership positions, compare this to J.C. Watts, a Republican who served in the leadership of his party before retiring this year.

Watts was promoted because he was good. He ran as a conservative Republican in a predominately white conservative district. All the voters saw was his credentials, not his color. He did a fine job and his constituents thought the world of him. He represented their values.

51 posted on 12/27/2002 7:14:47 AM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Rats fighting is one thing, but in my opinion there are a couple of things wrong with this story. Of course, when Rats are involved that usually goes without saying. In the first place, while I do not like Pelosi, she apparently has the authority to choose who she wants as the campaign leader. I am assuming that is one of the perks of her position. When one person "wins" it generally means that others lose. Disappointment is part of life and they need to accept that.

The other issue I have with what was said by the Black Caucas member, an unnecessary and racist "clique" that should have no place in a government which supposedly considers all men equal, is the revealing gall of this statement:

"If our leadership doesn't think we have juice to make their lives hard, then they are wrong."

That is exactly the problem with these black "interest" groups. They think they have the right to call all the shots and consider it perfectly okay to make anyone's life "hard" that doesn't fall in step with their will. It is like an infection that, left unchecked, spreads and festers throughout our society and generates the kind of racist hatred that it CLAIMS that it exists to prevent.

I cannot think of any good that Pelosi will do for any but the whining liberal contingent, but that aside we have to consider, does our congress exist to serve ALL the people or just the black caucas and their clearly racist interests?

52 posted on 12/27/2002 7:21:47 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Could somebody explain to me how the Republicans managed to orchestrate the elevation of the pathetic simpleton Nancy Pelosi to Democrat Minority Leader? I just can't stop smiling....

Shhhhhhhhhh... we were trying to keep that quiet. She's there for the same reason that Terry McCauliffe is still in a position of power. We were behind that too. Right now we're secretly pouring million$ into financing RevRunt Al Sharpton's presidential bid and trying to get AlGore to reconsider his decision not to run.

Ya know, in retrospect, we should be happy that Hillary gave us that great idea about forming this vast rightwing conspiracy!

53 posted on 12/27/2002 7:28:12 AM PST by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
"The slection of Matsui is a boon for us, bot not because of the infighting - the infighting is mere gravy. Matsui's stock in trade from 2001 on - at least his attack style, has been to demagouge Social Security. In other words, scare the old folks. Refresh my memory, folks, but hasn't Social Security reform been a winning issue for Republicans in 2000 and 2002? Bush, Sununu, Liddy Dole, and a few others campaigned on it and won. We're in good shape on this - and if Matsui fights on this ground - we'll clean his clock."

Matsui's an IGNORANT RAT DOLT and we shall Split his Wig in the upcoming months and years!!

Happy Days are HERE Again...the Skies are Blue and Clear AGAIN!!

FReegards...MUD

54 posted on 12/27/2002 7:32:05 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mjp
My party can't say that, and it saddens me.

Waaaa-waaaaa. Cry me a freakin' river! Are we supposed to care? Watts was elevated because he was good and had the stones necessary to get the job done for ALL Republicans; not just black Republicans (and this would have been the case even if there were "several" black Republicans in Congress).

This whine is yet another spill about position "entitlements" as opposed to a position earned. Even when slapped in the face by the massa, the CB(D)C continues to enjoy their stay on the Democratic plantation. Let 'em stay and kiss feet till they rot. We're working on the more intelligent masses.

I'd love to shake the hand of whoever engineered Pelosi's entre into the leadership position. She was custom ordered for us. Then again, maybe I wouldn't like to shake their hand - it's obvious that they are oblivious to the help Pelosi unwittingly gives us in the long run. Maybe they can give us more unwittingly advantageous decisions...

55 posted on 12/27/2002 7:32:31 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
No kiddin'. I mean, Matsui's a nice target. He's likely to attack us on an avenue that we have figured out how to defend after being demagouged so many times (Social Security - Sununu and Dole won campaigning on reforming that program).

Those leftists are arrogant people, y'know.
56 posted on 12/27/2002 7:36:19 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: mjp; EdZep
Isn't Matsui a card-carrying Socialist?
57 posted on 12/27/2002 7:38:11 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
derrr. I felt I didn't have to overemphasize J.C.'s qualifications, as Republicans usually do not promote anyone unless they are qualified.

by comparison qualified blacks like Harold Ford Jr. haven't been given the same opportunity by the dems. surprise surprise.

(Ford would have been a very good party leader, I'm glad they went with Pelosi as it is good for us)
58 posted on 12/27/2002 7:41:25 AM PST by BaBaStooey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mjp
More good news for conservatives. :-)
59 posted on 12/27/2002 7:44:51 AM PST by blastdad51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BaBaStooey
while in Bush's case, all the minorities he has picked, right down to Labor Sec. Elaine Chao, have been qualified and competent in their jobs.

Except maybe Norm Mineta, who is a Democrat.

-PJ

60 posted on 12/27/2002 7:48:27 AM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson