Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
I saw a poll on the news today. The most admired woman was Hillary (7%) followed by Laura Bush (6%), etc. The talking head said that for this poll people picked the names - they were not prompted. I found it quite disturbing.
4 posted on 12/26/2002 8:09:37 PM PST by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NEWwoman
That is disturbing. Americans must learn about the real Hillary Clinton before it is too late.
5 posted on 12/26/2002 8:12:30 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: NEWwoman
"I found it quite disturbing"

The only way Hillary would be freely picked over Laura Bush would be if the pollees were all from the DU or NOW or CNN. They have ways of making their polls cut the way they want them to. Laura Bush has class, something that Hillary or her shrill sycophant b*tches wouldn't recognize if it reached out and bit them in the nose!

25 posted on 12/26/2002 9:08:00 PM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: NEWwoman
Well I guess that's good news - not disturbing at all. This means 93% of the country didn't pick the Wicked Witch of the Ozarks. We know that at least 7% of the population are certified wackos anyhow.
39 posted on 12/26/2002 10:01:26 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson