Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
Oh, for heaven's sake. This is absurd. Talk about a classic case of "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."

Liberals assault free speech by going after Lott. So, "conservatives" follow their lead and go after Murray for her "traitorous remarks."

When will the madness end? And, do "conservatives" really want to be using liberals as an example on how to behave?

As an aside ... Question for the warmongers: Is it ever possible to argue against war without being a traitor? If not, why not? Inquiring minds want to know.
52 posted on 12/26/2002 4:48:35 PM PST by LiberalBuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LiberalBuster
I see the difference between what the Liberal 'RATS and the media did to Trent Lott and what Patty Murray's remarks conveyed. And not to mention the fact that the Liberal Media walked away from the story about her happy remarks about ObL, whom has declared war against our country. Besides the fact that ObL did NOT build bridges and roads for the poor people, as she claimed in her propaganda rant. Do you believe her spiel?...do you believe that the U.S. is the "Great Satan" and ObL is the omni-benevolent?.....

I don't think you've seen all the reports or something. I certainly don't think you see the uphill fight that we have against the Liberals and the Liberal enabling media...

57 posted on 12/26/2002 5:27:39 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: LiberalBuster
Freedom of speech means also having the freedom to criticize and disagree with someone else's speech.

Would you prefer we all simply agree with everything we hear and read in order to not interfere with their free speech rights?

Arguing against war is not the issue. Supporting a terrorist such as Osama Bin Laden is.

Question: Did Patty Murray support Osama Bin Laden by painting a false picture of him while giving a speech to high school kids? If not, why would the Taliban Online believe she had?

If so, why? Why would a United States Senator believe a terrorist had done more to help lift people out of poverty in the middle east than America has?

Does she not realize terrorism, madrassa and medeaval teachings (like those promoted and supported by Osama Bin Laden), are largely what is preventing the people of the middle east from developing as a civilized place to live?

Can she truly be ignorant to the beacon of hope, prosperity, and freedom America has provided to the suffering people of the world, so many of which live under tyrannical dictatorial rule?
58 posted on 12/26/2002 5:30:19 PM PST by planesman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson