If you want to debate - let's do it - but first you have to admit or 'own upto' what you said.
You made the statements the unions priced themselves out of the job market, etc.
When I asked what about non-union jobs - you said the article was talking about unionized industries.
I replied I interpreted the article as speaking of jobs in general - so what about non-union jobs. You took exception to a word I used and accused me of being a democrat and a leftie.
I asked again what about non-union jobs and you reply your post was not about union jobs -
I keep trying to get you back to your original post and my original question. If you refuse to do that - then let's just don't debate.
(Unions and their goons drive up the cost of their labor to the point it becomes more productive to have it done out of the country. Then they wonder why their jobs go away. Funny how it works.)
Now could we try again - since all the jobs lost were not union jobs - to what would you attribute their loss?And you are right your last post was not about unions - It was just more attacks and obfucation.