Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Wednesday, December 25, 2002

Quote of the Day by demosthenes by Jonathon Spectre

1 posted on 12/25/2002 8:19:45 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2
"Uncontrollable catastrophe" They must be speaking about themselves.
2 posted on 12/25/2002 8:34:54 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Krazy Kim needs to be brought to heel.

This means that a war plan needs to put together that allows for his capture alive...

Which allows for him to be tried, by us, for his crimes against the Korean people and hung at a gala event sometime when the weather's good.

3 posted on 12/25/2002 8:35:18 AM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Just how many of these "loose ends" Clinton left out there will Bush and the American people need to deal with?
4 posted on 12/25/2002 8:40:05 AM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"The North's incendiary comments came as Pyongyang accelerated its takeover of nuclear fuel and reactors placed under international surveillance under a 1994 agreement with the United States."

Where are all the pin-heads that chastised Bush for including NK in the "axis of evil?" Seems like they are awfully quiet right now.

I suppose they think we should elect another democRAT president who will now give them our plans for the more sophisticated nuclear bombs, since they already have our satellite codes for missile guidance courtesy of the 'toon. (/sarc.)

5 posted on 12/25/2002 8:47:56 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
This is an extremely dangerous situation, and there is no obvious solution. Unlike Iraq, which can launch a few relatively ineffective scuds at neighboring countries, and use WMD against invading troops, North Korea can quickly inflict unacceptable damage to South Korea.

North Korea now has at least two nukes, so a pre-emptive strike is very risky. An invasion would be extremely difficult.

If it were just a matter of learning to live with a nuclear-armed North Korea, that would be one thing. But these folks are certifiably nuts. Not only could they use these weapons in an unprovoked surprise attack, but they're crazy enough to sell them to other rogue states or even al-Qaida.

We don't have a lot of good or easy options.

6 posted on 12/25/2002 8:48:39 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
North Korea's brazen megalomania means that they refuse to dialogue with the inferior South, but instead want to compare themselves to the United States. The French do that too, but on a more feminine tone so far, by the way. That said, the personal consumption and final solution cleansing tones that are taken by NK are monstrous, to say the least. When life is in the way of NK dogs, life must fight back.
7 posted on 12/25/2002 8:50:35 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Schedule a 'missile test' from Vandenburg that uses a Minuteman III - like a test of NMD - but use a live nuclear warhead (or MIRVs) and take out the nuclear facilities in North Korea. No one - not even the ChiComs will shed too many tears.
9 posted on 12/25/2002 8:51:52 AM PST by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
I see. An "uncontrollable catastrophe," as opposed to a "controlable catastrophe?"
10 posted on 12/25/2002 8:57:40 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Things are going to get real "interesting."

A guy I work with retired from the Army last June, from Camp Page. He has a theory that the unification of the peninsula could be brought about by a North Korean attack on Japan, which would be applauded and supported by the majority of people in the ROK. Hatred of the Japanese is the great unifying factor, and would make a US response against the North launched from US bases in the ROK impossible.

When I was in Korea back 20 years ago Korean antipathy for Japan was understood, but muted. Have Korean-Japanese relations deteriorated significantly in the last several years?

US Forces in Korea cannot function without Host Nation Support; I'd venture to say that most American installations have more Koreans on them than Americans. If the NKs lobbed a nuke at Tokyo and the ROKs thought that was just fine with them, 2ID could wake up one morning surrounded, disarmed and interned, and there wouldn't be a heck of a lot they could do about it. Same with the Air Bases. Kinda makes ya think about our whole West Pac/Far East strategy.

Read Proud Legions by John Antal for a damn good account of what land warfare in Korea could be like this go around. It ain't 1950 anymore. This book assumes the ROKs are on our side.

13 posted on 12/25/2002 9:23:10 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The comments of North Korea amount to nothing more or less than "Give me your wallet or I'll shoot". That's all this is, a bunch of thugs who are demanding that the American taxpayer feed them, clothe them, and give them fuel or they are going to nuke the world.

They are playing with fire and don't even realize it.

17 posted on 12/25/2002 10:23:32 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"The issue should be settled between the DPRK and the U.S., the parties responsible for it. If the U.S. persistently tries to internationalize the pending issue between the DPRK and the U.S. in a bid to flee from its responsibility, it will push the situation to an uncontrollable catastrophe."

Okay, so we CAN'T go into Iraq without UN approval, and we CAN'T seek UN approval to go into North Korea. Would these insipid dictators make up their minds already!

18 posted on 12/25/2002 10:32:08 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
We get signal.

Someone set us up the bomb.

21 posted on 12/25/2002 10:56:58 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2






24 posted on 12/25/2002 11:21:15 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
It's definitely time to rethink the Korean policy. Sitting on the DMZ doesn't look so smart when the other side has a couple (and probably soon to be half dozen) nukes that can blow holes through the DMZ.

Fact is, if they nuked the DMZ and the capital of South Korea, what the heck would we do? Kinda hard to nuke back anything of value in North Korea. Plus their whole army would be in South Korea by the time we decided how to respond - so we wouldn't be able to nuke anything of military value in North Korea by then.

Maybe under the circumstance we should treat them like Pakistan. The South Koreans have kind of been jerks toward us recently anyway, so who the heck are we protecting? Maybe we should just move our current DMZ troops out of the Korean DMZ and park them on the Southern border of the US. That would stop our illegal immigration problem!

26 posted on 12/25/2002 12:55:46 PM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
SEOUL, South Korea, Dec. 24. North Korea warned today of an "uncontrollable catastrophe" unless the United States agrees to a negotiated solution to a tense standoff over its nuclear energy and weapons programs.

Two words...

"Neutron F***in' Bomb"! (nod to Dennis Leary).

No more pussy-footin with these cheap dictators! If it brings on calamity, then it does so.

These dictators have been building towards this day for FAR too long, and we have had too many Socialist/Liberals running the State Department and hand-wringing over "US Imperialism".

No longer. The Giant has been awakened, and heaven help the ones who awakened it, because WE won't!

Remember...

"The Avalanche has already started. It is too late for the PEBBLES to vote!"

28 posted on 12/25/2002 1:40:02 PM PST by Itzlzha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
'Warning?' The Old Gray Whore strikes again. In my day we called that a threat.
32 posted on 12/25/2002 4:44:47 PM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Sorta like getting a warning from Paul Reubens.


33 posted on 12/25/2002 4:56:56 PM PST by Bars4Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Who do these people think they are? Their little no-dong (aptly named) missles won't even reach the continental United States.

I say we take "merciless punishment" for $200

34 posted on 12/25/2002 5:12:28 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The fact that the ChiComs seem to be in favor of nonproliferation bodes well for a peaceful settlement.

Without China's support, North Korea is basically isolated in the international community.
36 posted on 12/25/2002 6:00:30 PM PST by jobloss_recovery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson