Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A sermon dressed up as a documentary
National Post ^ | December 24 2002 | Robert Fulford

Posted on 12/24/2002 2:14:00 PM PST by knighthawk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/24/2002 2:14:00 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 12/24/2002 2:14:21 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Thanks for the post
3 posted on 12/24/2002 2:21:26 PM PST by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Merry Christmas
4 posted on 12/24/2002 2:22:39 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
It was an Islamic sermon on film.

It was no sermon...those usually require some effort to stay awake.

It was a nice recruiting video for Islam.

But there were some logical flaws in it (if the makers did indeed purport to
portray some wise founder of a major religion).

Instead, I learned that Muhammad was a sharp businessman, strong as a warrior,
shrewd in statescraft, and knew how to bag the babes.

But a holy prophet? Not bloody likely.
5 posted on 12/24/2002 2:24:56 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
You too! Enjoy the Holidays.
6 posted on 12/24/2002 2:32:21 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"...How to film the life of a man who ordered that no one should ever make an image of him?..."

Do any credible descriptions of him exist?

Was he an ugly mammer-jammer? goofy looking? What?

Who'd be the most natural in the role of 'mohammed!'?

Marlon Brando?... Or PeeWee Herman?

And who would be best in the role of his wife?

Mara Wilson? Nah... She's too OLD...

7 posted on 12/24/2002 2:52:26 PM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"Muhammad improved the lives of women (he eliminated female infanticide, for example)

Huh? Female infanticide? Neither the Christians nor the Jews, the two main groups that Islam swamped in its violent barbaric sweep, practiced female infanticide. The pagans might have - but those who became Christians certainly didn't, and women were a heck of a lot better off in Christian societies than in Islamic ones.

Utterly disgusting garbage and lies.

8 posted on 12/24/2002 3:01:24 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
sickening.
9 posted on 12/24/2002 3:09:49 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I didn't know PBS was still on the air.
10 posted on 12/24/2002 3:11:34 PM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
The filmmakers ducked every difficult issue, as if afraid that even a hint of criticism (unless instantly shot down) would offend someone.

Maybe they really were afriad of being shot....

11 posted on 12/24/2002 3:22:38 PM PST by eccentric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Did it mention muhamhead was a pedophile?
12 posted on 12/24/2002 3:28:49 PM PST by gilor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
I didn't know PBS was still on the air.

Whether it is or isn't, you're still paying for it.

13 posted on 12/24/2002 3:33:42 PM PST by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
It's noticeable that even the National Post tiptoes around the real nature of Muhammed--a treacherous, deceitful man of violence. I guess they don't want to be assassinated.
14 posted on 12/24/2002 3:47:11 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
There are several sources, like the hadith:

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/

The koran also shows a lot of what kind of man he was.

Also several biographies exist.

But there is much discussion about it. The most reliable source however remains the hadith of Bukhari and Muslim, which are declared 'sahih', which means they are seen as authentic and do not contradict the koran.

Look here what PBS 'forgot' to include:

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.176
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/062.sbt.html#007.062.122
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/018.sbt.html#002.018.161
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/006.sbt.html#001.006.301
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/053.sbt.html#004.053.392
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/059.sbt.html#005.059.369
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/059.sbt.html#005.059.522
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/059.sbt.html#005.059.540
15 posted on 12/24/2002 4:03:11 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
The most agregious part of this islamic lovefest was when they showed a black woman in the south, who converted to islam, have to face and live with (aghast) Christians in her community and the "pain" that must have put her through.
16 posted on 12/24/2002 4:08:22 PM PST by For the Unborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: For the Unborn
Gee, the PBS also 'forget' to include these interesting things from the hadith (about mohammed owning black slaves!):

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/091.sbt.html#009.091.368
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/073.sbt.html#008.073.182
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/015.sbt.html#002.015.103
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/010.smt.html#010.3901

And here mohammed says something Lott would not get away with:

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/011.sbt.html#001.011.664
17 posted on 12/24/2002 4:25:33 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: knighthawk
The filmmakers ducked every difficult issue, as if afraid that even a hint of criticism (unless instantly shot down) would offend someone.

Maybe they just don't want a bomb up their a$$.

Has PBS ever treated another subject with such reverence?

The Prophet Clinton and His Consort.

19 posted on 12/24/2002 5:55:00 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
it makes it more of a blunder given the season! Merry Christmas, KH.
20 posted on 12/24/2002 9:01:17 PM PST by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson