Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida's Sen. Bob Graham 'seriously Considering' 2004 Presidential Bid
AP ^ | 12/23/02 | Ken Thomas

Posted on 12/23/2002 8:44:06 AM PST by Jean S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: No Truce With Kings
Just my opinion, but he could be going
for VP with whoever tops their ticket.
Dems would hope to take FL out of play
for Bush. Those electoral votes are
mighty important. (Remember?)

Also my opinion, Graham didn't plan
the thing on his own. Someone is back
in the shadows orchestrating like mad.

FWIW...
21 posted on 12/23/2002 10:12:05 AM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: *Election President; KQQL
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
22 posted on 12/23/2002 10:36:46 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Bob Graham has been around politics in Florida for eons.

Old Bob may be the best the Democrat socialists can put up, but he's a big time loser against Bush here.

23 posted on 12/23/2002 10:53:13 AM PST by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The dems are trying to pull a scare tactic on the gop. Isn't working--the only time to be worried would be if Graham actually got the nomination--would Hill allow it?
24 posted on 12/23/2002 11:14:01 AM PST by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
..who outside of Arkansas had heard of Bill Clinton, when he ran? Or who had heard of Jimmy Carter, outside of Georgia?

Mind you, I can think of worse people than Bob Graham in the Democratic party.

I think you just did. :)

25 posted on 12/23/2002 11:15:13 AM PST by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
Name five
26 posted on 12/23/2002 11:19:41 AM PST by Cannon6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SCHROLL
I too laughed out loud when I heard it. Generating laughter is not a good sign - even anger would be preferable.
27 posted on 12/23/2002 11:27:25 AM PST by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cannon6
Al Gore
Hillary Clinton
John Kerry
Tom Daschle
Grey Davis

All of whom have been seriously mentioned as possible Presidential candidates.

Now, finding 5 Dems better than Graham, might be a bit of a struggle.

28 posted on 12/23/2002 11:32:50 AM PST by Celtjew Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; Torie; deport; ambrose
If he doesn't run for re-election, then GOP has a good shot of picking up the senate seat.
29 posted on 12/23/2002 1:39:54 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Graham, 66, said he has not decided whether he will seek re-election to the Senate in 2004 if he does not run for president.

I find this above statement rather odd, as I believe he has previously announced, numerous times, that he wanted to retire from politics and would not seek re-election.

As for a White House run, especially on the VP slot, I think voters will perceive that his experience on the Senate Intelligence Committee means he is actually one of the VERY few Dems who could be a serious contender for the White House in 2004 in this current international climate.
30 posted on 12/23/2002 2:07:35 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
Thanks for the ping on this news, Julie.
31 posted on 12/23/2002 2:10:00 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Yawn. Graham hasn't got a chance, and he should know that. He was quiet as a church mouse during the Elian controversy--for that reason alone his ability to carry his own state of Florida would be in jeopardy.

Graham might be able to peel a few northern Florida votes, but he would face a mighty fight for them--he's likely whistling Dixie to see what kind of attention he can get from his fellow 'rat Senators who are also looking at running.

32 posted on 12/23/2002 2:40:58 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
need to put this on the 2004 senate thread. Good info.
33 posted on 12/23/2002 2:48:54 PM PST by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
NOT IN MY HOUSE!Graham will not carry Florida, LOL, to us, he is no different than Gore. You gotta remember the Florida Freepers are the RANGERAIRBORNE of the Freepers, LOL.
34 posted on 12/23/2002 2:52:44 PM PST by agincourt1415
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Bob Graham has ben one of my senators in Florida for years and was a govenor prior to that. I honestly don't remember anything he has ever done as either. What makes this nothing think we should want him as president?????????
35 posted on 12/23/2002 2:54:21 PM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Another Red Herring.
The democratic candidate for the '04 Presidential Election will be hillary clinton.

Any who seriously believes that al gore bowed out of his own volition is seriously hallunicating.
36 posted on 12/23/2002 2:54:28 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
That is the democrat party platform:
1. Lies
2. Fear
3. Class division and hatred.
4. The slaughter of the innocent. [unborn and partially-born babies]
5. Degenercy and pervision.
37 posted on 12/23/2002 2:58:34 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
The aging Graham would have difficulty, but would probably pull through, a re-election campaign in Fla. for Senate in 2004, when he will be about 68+ years of age. He is a lackluster but workaday Senator.

Someone must be deciding she needs him for Veep, but such a role will not carry Fla. for the Dems. in the present environment...they can always hope something changes back toward the picture of fall 2000...

As Pres candidate he would be dull, duller, and completely incredible. Would probably lose even in Fla.-- and would lose badly nationwide against anything like the current GOP lineup.

38 posted on 12/23/2002 3:01:35 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
FYI, Edwards can run for both.
39 posted on 12/23/2002 3:01:46 PM PST by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
You understand that the democrats think that laws apply only to others, not them. don't you?

As in N.J. the democrats in N.D. will petition a judge [Along with almost everything in life, the Judiciary is one more instituition that the democrats have corrupted] that will grant dashel an exemption to run.
40 posted on 12/23/2002 3:03:33 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson