From the above exchange: The notion that 'c' was considerably faster in the past has appeal to both cosmologists and creationists. Both camps have severe difficulties in explaining the observed universe, even with their vastly different time frames, unless things happened much faster initially. Cosmologists would like to see a near infinite speed of light immediately following the big bang and creationists about 10^11 times 'c'. Both are misled by their misunderstanding of the creation myths. ...
Proof that the cosmologists are mistaken both in their speculations about light-speed and the big bang hypothesis comes from the very source referred to in the above report -- the light from a quasar. The above-quoted article says that the quasar is 10 billion light years distant. That is based on the most peculiar big bang theory that the volume of the universe is increasing. It follows the observation that faint objects have their spectrum shifted towards the red. The discoverer of this phenomenon, Edwin Hubble, was careful to not attribute this 'redshift' to the Doppler effect of the velocity of recession of the object, but theorists were not so circumspect. The redshift -- velocity - distance equation quickly became another of the many dogmatic assumptions of cosmology.
Is it possible that within the event horizon of a black hole, the speed of light increases exponentially, eventually ranging beyond the temporal connection of spcatime, resulting in the 'spitting out' of a new galaxy source and that event occurs beyond our temporal limits in such a way that a new reduction of 'lightspeed' and time limits results in a quasar appearing in the neighborhood of a massive galaxy with a massive black hole at its core but along a track at 90 degrees to the 'plane' of the parent galaxy, and thus along the polar axis of the black hole?