Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
Except the observed possible variation in the speed of light is on the order of a few percent, not 1011. An entire thread occured on this very subject in the recent past. Also, your article implies that all cosmologists wish the speed of light to have been higher in the past (coincidentally agreeing with creationists). However, most cosmologists (judging from the stuff they publish) are quite happy with a constant c; only a very few of them seem at all dissatisfied.
271 posted on 12/26/2002 4:48:19 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
The 'observed' speed ... thus the naysayers argue that 'we have yet to observe from a different temporal reference when and distant past speed could easily have been faster'. The physics inside a black hole makes an acceleration of light speed quite possible, it's assumed as a constant max for the purposes of calculation, but even Hawking wouldn't claim it is a fix law inside black holes and near the surface of neutron stars.
272 posted on 12/26/2002 8:29:12 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

To: Junior
Placemarker.
273 posted on 12/26/2002 7:01:44 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson