Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coffee,Tea,or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wifes Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell attheAirport?
lewrockwell.com ^ | 12/18/2002 | Nicholas Monahan

Posted on 12/21/2002 11:33:05 AM PST by Libertarian Billy Graham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: BigBobber; EricOKC
To: EricOKC
"... We shouldn't have frisked them because they were "pregnant"? ... terrorists are going to eat your lunch because we have to protect the honor of "pregnant" women? ..."
# 591 by BigBobber
**********************

The "honor" of pregnant women? It isn't just pregnant women, BigBobber.

The Patriot Act was our government's official notice that our society is no longer free. Airport searches have nothing to do with "security." They are only meant to condition us, to convince us that we need government to protect us.

601 posted on 12/21/2002 11:59:27 PM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: general_re; Happygal
And, Happygal, travel is a right, too.
To: exodus
Saying that one has the right to travel is hardly the same as saying that one has a specific right to a particular method of traveling. Try driving around with four bald tires, no windshield, and a lapsed registration sometime, and see how well the "right to travel" argument serves you in traffic court.
# 597 by general_re
**********************

You're telling me that government has to approve my rights before I can practice my rights, general_re?

I think you've missed my point. To clarify, rights don't come from our government.

602 posted on 12/22/2002 12:04:56 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: exodus
You're telling me that government has to approve my rights before I can practice my rights, general_re?

I'm telling you that your rights are not, and cannot be, absolute. You do not have the right to fly on a plane that does not belong to you, free from any scrutiny whatsoever, because your general right to travel does not guarantee you a particular method by which you can travel.

Asserting rights beyond what is enumerated in the Constitution is an exercise in wishful thinking. Both the contractual obligations of your ticket and the Commerce Clause of the Constitution provide ample justification for consensual searches of passengers - the Fourth Amendment is simply irrelevant, since the search is entirely consensual. If you don't like it, you are free to refuse to be searched, and then travel by some other means. You can always take a bus. Or buy your own plane. But the Commerce Clause clearly and explicitly gives Congress the right to regulate interstate commerce, which obviously includes a flight from Portland to Las Vegas.

603 posted on 12/22/2002 12:15:14 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies]

To: exodus
"you try to get a new member banned"

How so? It may not have been overly polite fer HG to call ya an "arse", but I don't see where kako's membership is the least bit endangered...we've got plenty of PinkoFReepers!!

FReegards...MUD

604 posted on 12/22/2002 12:19:17 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies]

To: exodus
I think you can get in trouble by over-generalizing. I consider myself a libertarian and I'm very suspicious of the Patriot Act and other measures that appear to impinge on our freedoms.

However, Bush and the feds are NOT conditioning us to be afraid. They are telling us every chance they get that "Islam is a religion of peace" and to go about our lives, fly in planes, etc.

My fear of Muslim terrorism is based on rational analysis of the facts we read wbout every day. Muslim terrorists like to use bombs. They have on several occasions USED WOMEN AS BOMBERS. They have asked our courts to allow Mulim women to keep their veils on for IDENTIFICATION PHOTOS. They get very indignant about "kafirs" looking at or touching their women.

So I asked a simple question that no one is willing to answer. How do you tell if a "pregnant" women is really pregnant and not a Muslim terrorist? This has nothing to do with the Patriot Act. How are you going to do it?

The thrust of this article is that "pregnant women" should not be patted down in airports. If we fall for that one, Johnney Mommamed is going to have free pass to smuggle anything they want onto airplanes with the help of their Burka-clad compadres.

So I ask once again. How are you going to stop them?
605 posted on 12/22/2002 12:21:37 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: general_re
To: exodus
"... Asserting rights beyond what is enumerated in the Constitution is an exercise in wishful thinking ..."
# 603 by general_re
**********************

Once again, you tell me that I only have the rights my government listed in the Constitution.

Rights do not come from government, general_re.

606 posted on 12/22/2002 12:21:55 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: exodus
Rights do not come from government, general_re.

That may very well be, but asserting a right that society does not recognize or protect is of no practical value whatsoever. We have a contract enumerating the rights that society recognizes and protects - if you wish to add to that list, there is a procedure for so doing.

607 posted on 12/22/2002 12:24:04 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]

To: general_re
To: exodus
"... Both the contractual obligations of your ticket and the Commerce Clause of the Constitution provide ample justification for consensual searches of passengers ..."
# 603 by general_re
**********************

"Regulation" does not include government agents searching people without warrants.

A search is not "consensual" if it is forced upon you.

608 posted on 12/22/2002 12:28:07 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: exodus
Rights do not come from government, general_re.

"Let me say it yet again: The rights of the people come from God. The powers of government come from the people. The American people delegated the specific powers they wanted the federal government to have through the Constitution. And any additional powers they wanted to grant were supposed to be added by amendment.

"It's largely because we've forgotten these simple principles that the country is in so much trouble..."

"And the result of the loss of our original political idiom has been, as I say, to invert the original presumptions. The average American, whether he has had high-school civics or a degree in political science, is apt to assume that the Constitution somehow empowers the government to do nearly anything, while implicitly limiting our rights by listing them."

Joseph Sobran, How Tyranny Came To America

Written before 9/11, incidentally.

609 posted on 12/22/2002 12:28:27 AM PST by pupdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]

To: exodus
A search is not "consensual" if it is forced upon you.

No search is being forced upon you. You are free to refuse to be searched at any point during the boarding process.

610 posted on 12/22/2002 12:31:40 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: general_re
To: exodus
"... If you don't like it, you are free to refuse to be searched, and then travel by some other means. You can always take a bus. Or buy your own plane ..."
# 603 by general_re
**********************

We are "free" to refuse to do our job, if the job requires that we be four States away tomorrow morning?

We're "free" to give up a three day vacation in Hawii?

Air travel is a requirement of a major segment of our society, and a welcome luxury for all the rest of us.

Travel is a right. The fact that our government is infringing on that right does not negate it.

611 posted on 12/22/2002 12:34:49 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: general_re
If some cretin in a security uniform feels free to grab my wife's breasts in front of a line of people in an airport, I am going to feel free to throw that cretin over the xray machine to the next concourse.

And when I get out of jail, I might start digging up the serious iron.

That is where this lunacy is taking us.

612 posted on 12/22/2002 12:38:54 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
9th amendment
613 posted on 12/22/2002 12:40:17 AM PST by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: general_re
To: exodus
"... the Commerce Clause clearly and explicitly gives Congress the right to regulate interstate commerce, which obviously includes a flight from Portland to Las Vegas.
# 603 by general_re
**********************

True, a commercial flight from Portland to Las Vegas would qualify as interstate commerce.

A commercial flight from Houston, Texas to Austin, Texas does not qualify. Even so, the same regulations are used, whether between States or within States.

The federal government does not have the authority to "regulate" commerce inside the individual States. The fact is that the Federal government actually does regulate commerce within individual States.

Our national government has usurped powers not granted to it.

614 posted on 12/22/2002 12:42:06 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: exodus
Then buy your own plane - it's the very essence of libertarianism, if I do say. The fact that you are "required" to have some particular thing by some particular third party does not make it a right which you can expect the rest of the world to provide to you unencumbered. The fact that your employer requires you to fly does not magically make flying into an absolute right for you or your employer.

Travel is a right. It is not, and cannot be, an absolute and unregulated right. No rights can be absolute and unregulated in any society consisting of more than one person. This society has decided that you must consent to a search in order to fly on a commercial flight, a requirement perfectly in accord with the Constitution. Doing so does not violate your general right to travel, since you are free to seek other means if you object.

615 posted on 12/22/2002 12:43:22 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
That is where this lunacy is taking us.

Seriously: when every single violation of a person's body or property is met with, "Well duh, if you had just bent over it wouldn't have hurt so bad!", we've gone over the edge and are falling into a very dark chasm.

I personally agree with the closing line in this piece. Me and my wife just decided on a timetable for having children, and they are most definitely going to get acquainted with some nice upstanding young men named Jefferson and Franklin.

616 posted on 12/22/2002 12:44:32 AM PST by pupdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
OK, you're a macho guy. Now tell us all what level of security you think we need at airports and how it would be carried out.
617 posted on 12/22/2002 12:45:35 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
"How is a security agent in an airport supposed to determine if a woman is really pregnant, or has a bomb or other contraband under her clothes?"

By a private display of her stomach, perhaps. Unless she is black, white, or Latino, for example, in which case she should be passed through unmolested.

618 posted on 12/22/2002 12:48:24 AM PST by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
To: exodus
"... The thrust of this article is that "pregnant women" should not be patted down in airports. If we fall for that one, Johnney Mommamed is going to have free pass to smuggle anything they want onto airplanes with the help of their Burka-clad compadres ..."
# 605 by BigBobber
**********************

The thrust of this article is not that pregnant women should never be searched.

The complaint has to do with the public disrobing, and the public groping, of this man's wife.

619 posted on 12/22/2002 12:49:49 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I suggest, first off, that the article posted here is necessarily one-sided, representing this man's particular spin on whatever it was that happened in that airport on that day. Obviously, the security guard's version differs somewhat. Like most cases, the truth probably lies somewhere between the two versions.

Second, I am not enamored of the idea of mouth-breathers groping women indiscriminately either, but I also recognize that there is a vested interest in acting to insure the safety and welfare of passengers, not least because the slight inconvenience to the hundred or so passengers might very well prevent the deaths of several thousands on the ground. I think there is a happy medium between perverts feeling up your wife in the boarding queue, and no security at all.

620 posted on 12/22/2002 12:49:51 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson