Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coffee,Tea,or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wifes Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell attheAirport?
lewrockwell.com ^ | 12/18/2002 | Nicholas Monahan

Posted on 12/21/2002 11:33:05 AM PST by Libertarian Billy Graham

 

Coffee, Tea, or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wife’s Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell at the Airport and Then Lying About Why We Put You There?

by Nicholas Monahan

This morning I’ll be escorting my wife to the hospital, where the doctors will perform a caesarean section to remove our first child. She didn’t want to do it this way – neither of us did – but sometimes the Fates decide otherwise. The Fates or, in our case, government employees.

On the morning of October 26th Mary and I entered Portland International Airport, en route to the Las Vegas wedding of one of my best friends. Although we live in Los Angeles, we’d been in Oregon working on a film, and up to that point had had nothing but praise to shower on the city of Portland, a refreshing change of pace from our own suffocating metropolis.

At the security checkpoint I was led aside for the "inspection" that’s all the rage at airports these days. My shoes were removed. I was told to take off my sweater, then to fold over the waistband of my pants. My baseball hat, hastily jammed on my head at 5 AM, was removed and assiduously examined ("Anything could be in here, sir," I was told, after I asked what I could hide in a baseball hat. Yeah. Anything.) Soon I was standing on one foot, my arms stretched out, the other leg sticking out in front of me àla a DUI test. I began to get pissed off, as most normal people would. My anger increased when I realized that the newly knighted federal employees weren’t just examining me, but my 7½ months pregnant wife as well. I’d originally thought that I’d simply been randomly selected for the more excessive than normal search. You know, Number 50 or whatever. Apparently not though – it was both of us. These are your new threats, America: pregnant accountants and their sleepy husbands flying to weddings.

After some more grumbling on my part they eventually finished with me and I went to retrieve our luggage from the x-ray machine. Upon returning I found my wife sitting in a chair, crying. Mary rarely cries, and certainly not in public. When I asked her what was the matter, she tried to quell her tears and sobbed, "I’m sorry...it’s...they touched my breasts...and..." That’s all I heard. I marched up to the woman who’d been examining her and shouted, "What did you do to her?" Later I found out that in addition to touching her swollen breasts – to protect the American citizenry – the employee had asked that she lift up her shirt. Not behind a screen, not off to the side – no, right there, directly in front of the hundred or so passengers standing in line. And for you women who’ve been pregnant and worn maternity pants, you know how ridiculous those things look. "I felt like a clown," my wife told me later. "On display for all these people, with the cotton panel on my pants and my stomach sticking out. When I sat down I just lost my composure and began to cry. That’s when you walked up."

Of course when I say she "told me later," it’s because she wasn’t able to tell me at the time, because as soon as I demanded to know what the federal employee had done to make her cry, I was swarmed by Portland police officers. Instantly. Three of them, cinching my arms, locking me in handcuffs, and telling me I was under arrest. Now my wife really began to cry. As they led me away and she ran alongside, I implored her to calm down, to think of the baby, promising her that everything would turn out all right. She faded into the distance and I was shoved into an elevator, a cop holding each arm. After making me face the corner, the head honcho told that I was under arrest and that I wouldn’t be flying that day – that I was in fact a "menace."

It took me a while to regain my composure. I felt like I was one of those guys in The Gulag Archipelago who, because the proceedings all seem so unreal, doesn’t fully realize that he is in fact being arrested in a public place in front of crowds of people for...for what? I didn’t know what the crime was. Didn’t matter. Once upstairs, the officers made me remove my shoes and my hat and tossed me into a cell. Yes, your airports have prison cells, just like your amusement parks, train stations, universities, and national forests. Let freedom reign.

After a short time I received a visit from the arresting officer. "Mr. Monahan," he started, "Are you on drugs?"

Was this even real? "No, I’m not on drugs."

"Should you be?"

"What do you mean?"

"Should you be on any type of medication?"

"No."

"Then why’d you react that way back there?"

You see the thinking? You see what passes for reasoning among your domestic shock troops these days? Only "whackos" get angry over seeing the woman they’ve been with for ten years in tears because someone has touched her breasts. That kind of reaction – love, protection – it’s mind-boggling! "Mr. Monahan, are you on drugs?" His snide words rang inside my head. This is my wife, finally pregnant with our first child after months of failed attempts, after the depressing shock of the miscarriage last year, my wife who’d been walking on a cloud over having the opportunity to be a mother...and my anger is simply unfathomable to the guy standing in front of me, the guy who earns a living thanks to my taxes, the guy whose family I feed through my labor. What I did wasn’t normal. No, I reacted like a drug addict would’ve. I was so disgusted I felt like vomiting. But that was just the beginning.

An hour later, after I’d been gallantly assured by the officer that I wouldn’t be attending my friend’s wedding that day, I heard Mary’s voice outside my cell. The officer was speaking loudly, letting her know that he was planning on doing me a favor... which everyone knows is never a real favor. He wasn’t going to come over and help me work on my car or move some furniture. No, his "favor" was this: He’d decided not to charge me with a felony.

Think about that for a second. Rapes, car-jackings, murders, arsons – those are felonies. So is yelling in an airport now, apparently. I hadn’t realized, though I should have. Luckily, I was getting a favor, though. I was merely going to be slapped with a misdemeanor.

"Here’s your court date," he said as I was released from my cell. In addition, I was banned from Portland International for 90 days, and just in case I was thinking of coming over and hanging out around its perimeter, the officer gave me a map with the boundaries highlighted, sternly warning me against trespassing. Then he and a second officer escorted us off the grounds. Mary and I hurriedly drove two and a half hours in the rain to Seattle, where we eventually caught a flight to Vegas. But the officer was true to his word – we missed my friend’s wedding. The fact that he’d been in my own wedding party, the fact that a once in a lifetime event was stolen from us – well, who cares, right?

Upon our return to Portland (I’d had to fly into Seattle and drive back down), we immediately began contacting attorneys. We aren’t litigious people – we wanted no money. I’m not even sure what we fully wanted. An apology? A reprimand? I don’t know. It doesn’t matter though, because we couldn’t afford a lawyer, it turned out. $4,000 was the average figure bandied about as a retaining fee. Sorry, but I’ve got a new baby on the way. So we called the ACLU, figuring they existed for just such incidents as these. And they do apparently...but only if we were minorities. That’s what they told us.

In the meantime, I’d appealed my suspension from PDX. A week or so later I got a response from the Director of Aviation. After telling me how, in the aftermath of 9/11, most passengers not only accept additional airport screening but welcome it, he cut to the chase:

"After a review of the police report and my discussions with police staff, as well as a review of the TSA’s report on this incident, I concur with the officer’s decision to take you into custody and to issue a citation to you for disorderly conduct. That being said, because I also understand that you were upset and acted on your emotions, I am willing to lift the Airport Exclusion Order...."

Attached to this letter was the report the officer had filled out. I’d like to say I couldn’t believe it, but in a way, I could. It’s seemingly becoming the norm in America – lies and deliberate distortions on the part of those in power, no matter how much or how little power they actually wield.

The gist of his report was this: From the get go I wasn’t following the screener’s directions. I was "squinting my eyes" and talking to my wife in a "low, forced voice" while "excitedly swinging my arms." Twice I began to walk away from the screener, inhaling and exhaling forcefully. When I’d completed the physical exam, I walked to the luggage screening area, where a second screener took a pair of scissors from my suitcase. At this point I yelled, "What the %*&$% is going on? This is &*#&$%!" The officer, who’d already been called over by one of the screeners, became afraid for the TSA staff and the many travelers. He required the assistance of a second officer as he "struggled" to get me into handcuffs, then for "cover" called over a third as well. It was only at this point that my wife began to cry hysterically.

There was nothing poetic in my reaction to the arrest report. I didn’t crumple it in my fist and swear that justice would be served, promising to sacrifice my resources and time to see that it would. I simply stared. Clearly the officer didn’t have the guts to write down what had really happened. It might not look too good to see that stuff about the pregnant woman in tears because she’d been humiliated. Instead this was the official scenario being presented for the permanent record. It doesn’t even matter that it’s the most implausible sounding situation you can think of. "Hey, what the...godammit, they’re taking our scissors, honey!" Why didn’t he write in anything about a monkey wearing a fez?

True, the TSA staff had expropriated a pair of scissors from our toiletries kit – the story wasn’t entirely made up. Except that I’d been locked in airport jail at the time. I didn’t know anything about any scissors until Mary told me on our drive up to Seattle. They’d questioned her about them while I was in the bowels of the airport sitting in my cell.

So I wrote back, indignation and disgust flooding my brain.

"[W]hile I’m not sure, I’d guess that the entire incident is captured on video. Memory is imperfect on everyone’s part, but the footage won’t lie. I realize it might be procedurally difficult for you to view this, but if you could, I’d appreciate it. There’s no willful disregard of screening directions. No explosion over the discovery of a pair of scissors in a suitcase. No struggle to put handcuffs on. There’s a tired man, early in the morning, unhappily going through a rigorous procedure and then reacting to the tears of his pregnant wife."

Eventually we heard back from a different person, the guy in charge of the TSA airport screeners. One of his employees had made the damning statement about me exploding over her scissor discovery, and the officer had deftly incorporated that statement into his report. We asked the guy if he could find out why she’d said this – couldn’t she possibly be mistaken? "Oh, can’t do that, my hands are tied. It’s kind of like leading a witness – I could get in trouble, heh heh." Then what about the videotape? Why not watch that? That would exonerate me. "Oh, we destroy all video after three days."

Sure you do.

A few days later we heard from him again. He just wanted to inform us that he’d received corroboration of the officer’s report from the officer’s superior, a name we didn’t recognize. "But...he wasn’t even there," my wife said.

"Yeah, well, uh, he’s corroborated it though."

That’s how it works.

"Oh, and we did look at the videotape. Inconclusive."

But I thought it was destroyed?

On and on it went. Due to the tenacity of my wife in making phone calls and speaking with relevant persons, the "crime" was eventually lowered to a mere citation. Only she could have done that. I would’ve simply accepted what was being thrown at me, trumped up charges and all, simply because I’m wholly inadequate at performing the kowtow. There’s no way I could have contacted all the people Mary did and somehow pretend to be contrite. Besides, I speak in a low, forced voice, which doesn’t elicit sympathy. Just police suspicion.

Weeks later at the courthouse I listened to a young DA awkwardly read the charges against me – "Mr. Monahan...umm...shouted obscenities at the airport staff...umm... umm...oh, they took some scissors from his suitcase and he became...umm...abusive at this point." If I was reading about it in Kafka I might have found something vaguely amusing in all of it. But I wasn’t. I was there. Living it.

I entered a plea of nolo contendere, explaining to the judge that if I’d been a resident of Oregon, I would have definitely pled "Not Guilty." However, when that happens, your case automatically goes to a jury trial, and since I lived a thousand miles away, and was slated to return home in seven days, with a newborn due in a matter of weeks...you get the picture. "No Contest" it was. Judgment: $250 fine.

Did I feel happy? Only $250, right? No, I wasn’t happy. I don’t care if it’s twelve cents, that’s money pulled right out of my baby’s mouth and fed to a disgusting legal system that will use it to propagate more incidents like this. But at the very least it was over, right? Wrong.

When we returned to Los Angeles there was an envelope waiting for me from the court. Inside wasn’t a receipt for the money we’d paid. No, it was a letter telling me that what I actually owed was $309 – state assessed court costs, you know. Wouldn’t you think your taxes pay for that – the state putting you on trial? No, taxes are used to hire more cops like the officer, because with our rising criminal population – people like me – hey, your average citizen demands more and more "security."

Finally I reach the piece de resistance. The week before we’d gone to the airport my wife had had her regular pre-natal checkup. The child had settled into the proper head down position for birth, continuing the remarkable pregnancy she’d been having. We returned to Portland on Sunday. On Mary’s Monday appointment she was suddenly told, "Looks like your baby’s gone breech." When she later spoke with her midwives in Los Angeles, they wanted to know if she’d experienced any type of trauma recently, as this often makes a child flip. "As a matter of fact..." she began, recounting the story, explaining how the child inside of her was going absolutely crazy when she was crying as the police were leading me away through the crowd.

My wife had been planning a natural childbirth. She’d read dozens of books, meticulously researched everything, and had finally decided that this was the way for her. No drugs, no numbing of sensations – just that ultimate combination of brute pain and sheer joy that belongs exclusively to mothers. But my wife is also a first-time mother, so she has what is called an "untested" pelvis. Essentially this means that a breech birth is too dangerous to attempt, for both mother and child. Therefore, she’s now relegated to a c-section – hospital stay, epidural, catheter, fetal monitoring, stitches – everything she didn’t want. Her natural birth has become a surgery.

We’ve tried everything to turn that baby. Acupuncture, chiropractic techniques, underwater handstands, elephant walking, moxibustion, bending backwards over pillows, herbs, external manipulation – all to no avail. When I walked into the living room the other night and saw her plaintively cooing with a flashlight turned onto her stomach, yet another suggested technique, my heart almost broke. It’s breaking now as I write these words.

I can never prove that my child went breech because of what happened to us at the airport. But I’ll always believe it. Wrongly or rightly, I’ll forever think of how this man, the personification of this system, has affected the lives of my family and me. When my wife is sliced open, I’ll be thinking of him. When they remove her uterus from her abdomen and lay it on her stomach, I’ll be thinking of him. When I visit her and my child in the hospital instead of having them with me here in our home, I’ll be thinking of him. When I assist her to the bathroom while the incision heals internally, I’ll be thinking of him.

There are plenty of stories like this these days. I don’t know how many I’ve read where the writer describes some breach of civil liberties by employees of the state, then wraps it all up with a dire warning about what we as a nation are becoming, and how if we don’t put an end to it now, then we’re in for heaps of trouble. Well you know what? Nothing’s going to stop the inevitable. There’s no policy change that’s going to save us. There’s no election that’s going to put a halt to the onslaught of tyranny. It’s here already – this country has changed for the worse and will continue to change for the worse. There is now a division between the citizenry and the state. When that state is used as a tool against me, there is no longer any reason why I should owe any allegiance to that state.

And that’s the first thing that child of ours is going to learn.

December 21, 2002

Nick Monahan works in the film industry. He writes out of Los Angeles where he lives with his wife and as of December 18th, his beautiful new son.

Copyright © 2002 LewRockwell.com

     

 

Back to LewRockwell.com Home Page



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: policestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: unspun
Even if true, that doesn't change the conditions of the situation. It's still the "security" staff that are the instigators and abusers, going beyond the bounds of valid behavior.

Looked at objectively, he and his wife were pat-searched. Their respective reactions, and HIS reaction to her reaction is what got HIM in trouble. Are boobs off limits in a search? Are women with big bellies off limits? I think everyone knows they are subject to a possible search when they fly. Are they only allowed to search me up to my elbows and no further?

221 posted on 12/21/2002 3:03:59 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Do *you* really think the ACLU told him that?

Not for a minute.

222 posted on 12/21/2002 3:04:19 PM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
"They didn't have a problem with my steel Cross pen though. I could ram that sucker right through your heart, but no nail clippers. "

Actually, you could not, at least while facing me. You might be able to get my lungs from behind, but that would still leave me capable of turning around, and the end would shortly come. Your Cross pen in a frontal attack would be useless against me. I would disarm you and you would start with a broken wrist as a deficit if you wished to continue the attack.

You make a mistake here, in assuming that all those who do not find a problem with the current security measures are some kind of wussy folks. That's not the case.

The reality is that the security procedures are designed to remove serious weapons. The initial screening these days does a very good job of it, as we saw in the number of weapons siezed during Thanksgiving. The secondary screenings are probably superfluous, particularly those at the boarding gates. And, indeed, that is being scaled back now, which you would know if you had really been following this.

The entire system has changed now, to the TSA system, and that's still being sorted out. Lots of new employees to train and to weed out if they're the wrong ones. The recent changes have lightened this stuff up.

In the meantime, air travellers must either get used to increased security or quit flying. Nobody's insisting that you fly. I've taken my shoes off now at least 25 times in the past six months for security. No biggie. I've stopped wearing belts, since buckles trigger the metal detectors. I'm going to switch to sweat pants for flying now, since zippers also set of the detectors and force some TSA guy to run the back of his hands down my pants. I'm sure he doesn't want to do that, either. I put all metal stuff in my carryon before going through security. I even have a brand new leather holder for my boarding pass and my driver's license. So, I go through cleanly now, and haven't been pulled aside for a long time. I don't waste the screeners' time, nor the time of the people behind me.

In my carryon, I don't put funny looking stuff. No hair-dryers, fruitcakes, etc. Those go in the checked bags or did. Now I'll be shipping them ahead.

I travel light...always. My carryon is a small briefcase, with one change of undies, my toothbrush, any prescriptions I'm taking, and little else. If I must take my notebook PC, I have it out and on as I approach security. My wife, having been flagged for an underwire bra once, now wears a sports bra for travelling. It's so simple to travel easily now. You just plan ahead.

And guess what? It takes less time now to go through security than it did before, because most travellers have figured all this out and are doing similar things. It's the amateurs who are getting pulled aside because they haven't figured it out.

I'll give you another tip. Don't rush to the gate to board. Most random screenings are done to folks who are early boarders. Just wait a bit, until all the screeners are busy, and you'll get right on your plane with your carry-on that fits under the seat, sit right down, and get out of everyone else's way. Oh yeah...do buy a sandwich to take on the plane with you. It's much better than the food on the plane.

Just in case you give in and fly again.
223 posted on 12/21/2002 3:04:46 PM PST by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: dighton
They've got to turn them down sooner or later, if they're going to turn them down. Better not to lead them along and then tick them off later. The eager young folks who answer the phones are given charts, etc. to follow and they do their work.

Maybe the smell you smell is just the ACLU?

bye
224 posted on 12/21/2002 3:05:16 PM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: paul51
Judges aren't too fond of, "We're trying him, but we destroyed the videotape." Had he had the guts and the funds to let them try him, they would have had to come up with some evidence other than their written reports...wouldn't they?

I am not sure I want to know the answer to that. To those of us who find three hundred dollar fines worth worrying about, the cost of hiring a lawyer is prohibitive. "They" know they can do anything to us, just like Klebold and Harris knew no gun law could stop them.

Government is schizophrenic. You deal with it knowing it can be a good and gentle institution 90% of the time, but you never can be sure it isn't off its meds. Then, BAM. You're in the hands of an unrestrained Hannibal Lecter.

I bet if you tried to videotape your encounters with airport security, you would NOT have a happy result, or end up with custody of the video of what happens.
225 posted on 12/21/2002 3:07:26 PM PST by ChemistCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Eternal_Bear
"I will not fly again until the insanity is over.

"

Good. More room for me.
226 posted on 12/21/2002 3:07:50 PM PST by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Good suggestions!!!
227 posted on 12/21/2002 3:08:30 PM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
I am sorry if I hurt your feelings also.

My comment was for illustrative purposes only.

I don't even know you, so it's obvious that I am not in a position to comment on any degree of "sluttyness" that might be relevent here.

But, I still think that a shock like this at 5 in the morning is allot easier to critique after the fact than it is to experience first hand.

228 posted on 12/21/2002 3:08:40 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Well, thank you. That was nice.
229 posted on 12/21/2002 3:10:18 PM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Thanks Jhoffa. Really.
230 posted on 12/21/2002 3:10:20 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I have always carried a knife: It's an Old-timer 3-blade stock knife. Until 9/11, I carried it in my pocket, putting it in the little tray when I went through security. Now, I put it in my checked luggage and retrieve it when I arrive at my destination. I've never needed the knife on the plane, so it's no big deal.

Nope, it's no big deal, until you need it.

231 posted on 12/21/2002 3:11:14 PM PST by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: unspun
(or do you think it's just fine to cause someone to cut your wife open?).

What? Who caused anyone to cut his wife open? She had a c-section because the baby was breech! It happens! Good God!

232 posted on 12/21/2002 3:11:39 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: ChemistCat
I can't disagree with you. It is concievable to me that they came down too hard on the guy and also they covered themselves. I'm not too naive to imagine it. None the less, in reading the article and evaluateing the tone of the guys own words, I think it is also likely the guys a jerk that provoked the situation and got more than he asked for. No sympathy here nor for that matter concerns that the same is likely to happen to me.
233 posted on 12/21/2002 3:12:43 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
No, no.. the pen thing was a hypothetical. Like the hypothetical "threat" of someone getting on board with nail clippers.

Honest, if you ever saw past the gate and the store fronts in the airport it would shock you what you actually goes on.

Many of those procedures are meaningless.

Another good example is controlling access to the ramp, I had a security card and door codes, but I seldom if ever used them. Polite people, strangers. Pilots, flight attendants and so on just hold the door wide for anyone who wishes to pass.

There is really allot missing from this debate. I wish everyone could have the opportunity to actually work there and see for themselves how things go, as opposed to just seeing armed military personel at the checkpoint and assuming everything is safe.

234 posted on 12/21/2002 3:14:39 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: weaponeer
I've never needed the knife on the plane, so it's no big deal.

Nope, it's no big deal, until you need it."

Nah. A stock knife is a crappy weapon. You can't stab with it, because the blade will fold. Slashing is a bad offense, since you leave yourself open. I'd rather be bare-handed than try to use a folding stock knife as a weapon. It's a tool, for cutting stuff and for cleaning your fingernails. I would never miss it if I were called upon to fight with someone.
235 posted on 12/21/2002 3:15:04 PM PST by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog; cajungirl; Jhoffa_
Now.... We should go shopping, really. I am not done yet either. :~D
236 posted on 12/21/2002 3:15:52 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
I do know that this was upsetting to him and her. Any of us might be undone by it. But afterwards, when we think about it most of us try to look at our behavior and how we might have not ended up in this pickle. This man seems to be on a mission now, proving he was a victim, his wife was, and so on. I believe that somethings are better just let go of. When people feel misused, they often go off on a tear proving they were misused, it sort of drives them. I don't know if that is a good thing to do. Security is full of potholes and it ought to be improved, I am seeing it as I fly every two or three weeks. But it is a two way street. As Mineeral Man said, the goal is to get on the plane out of the way in the fastest way. Going into the process armed for bear, irritable, grumbling and ready to rumble won't help anything. I think he went in in an edgy way and this happened. I hate to see pregnant women cry and get upset, anyone would. But sometimes we just have to buck up, get a stiff upper lip and go on. Or if we can't, our husbands can help by helping us. Often men feel if their wives are upset they have to go do something, like knock heads together. This is an unfair burden for men and unwise at times.
237 posted on 12/21/2002 3:16:23 PM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: paul51
Some people just seem to have a natural "I'm here to cause trouble" look on their face. My brother is one such. He never DOES anything, but everyone assumes he's going to; he gets pulled over, searched, jerked around by authority, and when it happens he gets red in the face and shakes and looks guilty. It happened when he was a little boy and I was mad at him, for that matter. He looks guilty when innocent.

We need to require our public servants (sarcasm? sometimes) to keep evidence against us when we have done something actionable--or they must let us go. And we must be permitted to keep evidence against them. Who was on the scene to advocate for a pregnant woman and her volatile husband? But security could just keep calling more biased "witnesses" for their side.
238 posted on 12/21/2002 3:16:47 PM PST by ChemistCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
No, I have no influence here. Good thing for me and FR!

But sometimes you can perceive patterns of language, and they remind you of people you have encountered in the past. Verbage, phrases, how often they puncutate.

I am starting to wonder if some small group about 4 or so years ago signed up under a bunch of different names, spaced months apart. So that now they can erupt.

I can name two (not on this thread). Funny how the job-loss posts seem to have vanished.
239 posted on 12/21/2002 3:18:46 PM PST by MonroeDNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
Frankly, I can't understand why half the airline industry is going bankrupt.

(/sarcasm)
240 posted on 12/21/2002 3:20:18 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson