This is hilarious! So we kick LOTT out and we still are the party of neosegregationist. Have you folks been watching your Liberal friends on TV lately! Gees!
What does it take to wake republicans up. This is only starting!
I honestly don't think the Democrats wanted Lott to stay as ML. The proof of their power and control was that they were able to make such a fuss that Republicans tossed him over. They were going to portray Republicans as the party of segregationists whether Lott stayed or went.
Democrats Lick Their Chops - December 19, 2002
Ladies and gentlemen, I offer the following AP story to prove my point that this isn't about Trent Lott anymore and hasn't been for the longest time, and to answer the question, "If Lott goes that ends it, doesn't it?" No, because it's not about Lott.
As evidence, I present this Associated Press story by Jesse Holland, headlined in the Chicago Sun-Times: "Democrats Lick Chops, Eye Civil Rights Agenda." Have you ever watched your dog or cat lick their chops after eating? I have two cats that do it all the time, cute little things. Can you just see Tom Daschle licking his chops? This is a phrase we use all the time, but try visualize Fritz Hollings licking his chops. Read the opening of this story:
"Whether Trent Lott stays or goes, Democrats and black groups see his apparent nostalgia for a segregated past as a golden opportunity to revive a hate crimes bill, push a minimum wage increase and force the White House to tilt new tax cuts toward minorities and the poor.
They predict the sudden Republican sensitivity to racial issues will continue whether or not Lott stays on as GOP Senate leader in the next Congress, when the party controls both houses."
This stuff like "sudden Republican sensitivity to racial issues" has to be dealt with or it will continue to be cemented in stone. Let me tell you who's not sensitive to racial progress, and that's the Democrats. The Democrats need their voters dumb, stupid, uneducated, and mildly hungry. They need as many of them in that state as possible because that's how you define need and inability. The worst thing in the world for a liberal Democrat politician is a self-starter, somebody with confidence, somebody who doesn't need somebody else for his needs, somebody who doesn't look to Washington for the answer to every problem, somebody who doesn't want to be a member of a group.
Look at who's keeping racial hatred burning in this country. It's not Trent Lott. It's people like Democrats who force busing in Boston on people who don't want it, blacks, as well as whites. It is Democrats standing figuratively in the schoolhouse door, preventing poor blacks from getting into decent schools. Affirmative action is another example it's gone way beyond its original intentions and become an insult and reverse discrimination.
It's time for this battle on race to be joined by our side, folks. It can no longer be avoided. The Democrats see an episode like this Lott situation as another way to divide the nation and paint all conservatives as racists. We can't let them do it.
When Sharpton tries for the Democrap nomination and gets screwed, the Democraps are going to have major problems.
GOD! That man is SUCH a liar! And just what the h*ll would HE know about what America stands for. I guess it depends on what the meaning of "stands" is.
The only thing the democRATS are trying to prevent is the thwarting of their sleazy fraudulent voting campaigns.
Why is it that the democRATS fight every attempt to uncover voter fraud that would restore integrity to the election process? Short answer, because they would LOSE much more frequently and they don't like to lose.
Translation: If blacks get better educated, wise up and start thinking for themselves and taking responsibility for themselves instead of being the perpetual victims, we're screwed!