Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: biblewonk
We will never know why simple things like gravity and magnetism work

Of course the key word in this "why". If you include the transcendent in your hypothesis, it is easy to deduce "intelligent design." Science is unconcerned with such "whys". It takes the universe to exist and to operate in ways that can be understood via observation, experimentation, and theory testing. On this level we know a whole lot about gravity and magnetism. (BTW, these two [of four] fundamental forces, are not all that simple.) If the answer, "because God made it that way," suffices for you, fine. Though, if all of our species took that attitude, we'd still be living in caves.

73 posted on 12/20/2002 11:35:56 AM PST by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Faraday
I'll never understand why the most wackadoo thumping fundies have to think that science and religion are mutually exclusive.
74 posted on 12/20/2002 11:37:38 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Faraday
the key word in this "why".

That's the thing, of course. "Why" is the instrumental case of "what" and implies an actor, agent, or motive.

Scientists don't waste much time on "why." Simply finding "what" or "how" is enough to keep one busy.

75 posted on 12/20/2002 11:42:37 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Faraday
the key word in this "why".

That's the thing, of course. "Why" is the instrumental case of "what" and implies an actor, agent, or motive.

Scientists don't waste much time on "why." Simply finding "what" or "how" is enough to keep one busy.

78 posted on 12/20/2002 11:47:10 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Faraday
Science is unconcerned with such "whys".

What a silly statement. Let's think about that one. Science is about all the whys.

87 posted on 12/20/2002 12:01:18 PM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Faraday
Like, why is it that when you shoot a 16 inch canon at a 45 degree angle, and an m16, both with about the same muzzle velocity, the large projectile goes farther?
88 posted on 12/20/2002 12:02:22 PM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Faraday
Or, if a battery discharges across a resistive load in 1 hr then how long will it take to discharge 2 such batteries in series across the same load. Ok you could form that question into a why question but I'd have to give away the answer.
89 posted on 12/20/2002 12:04:02 PM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson