Of course the key word in this "why". If you include the transcendent in your hypothesis, it is easy to deduce "intelligent design." Science is unconcerned with such "whys". It takes the universe to exist and to operate in ways that can be understood via observation, experimentation, and theory testing. On this level we know a whole lot about gravity and magnetism. (BTW, these two [of four] fundamental forces, are not all that simple.) If the answer, "because God made it that way," suffices for you, fine. Though, if all of our species took that attitude, we'd still be living in caves.
That's the thing, of course. "Why" is the instrumental case of "what" and implies an actor, agent, or motive.
Scientists don't waste much time on "why." Simply finding "what" or "how" is enough to keep one busy.
That's the thing, of course. "Why" is the instrumental case of "what" and implies an actor, agent, or motive.
Scientists don't waste much time on "why." Simply finding "what" or "how" is enough to keep one busy.
What a silly statement. Let's think about that one. Science is about all the whys.