Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats: A Lott of trouble (ANN COULTERS VIEWS ON TRENT LOTT ATTACK)
worldnetdaily ^ | 12/18/2002 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 12/18/2002 3:51:50 PM PST by TLBSHOW

Democrats: A Lott of trouble

I'm just glad Strom Thurmond isn't around to see this.

Statisticians believe Trent Lott is now on track to break Bill Clinton's single-season record for public apologies. During his recent B.E.T. appearance, Lott said he supported affirmative action, regretted voting against the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, and that he'd give "The Bernie Mac Show" another try.

What the Lott incident shows is that Republicans have to be careful about letting Democrats into our party. Back when they supported segregation, Lott and Thurmond were Democrats. This is something the media are intentionally hiding to make it look like the Republican Party is the party of segregation and race discrimination, which it never has been.

In 1948, Thurmond did not run as a "Dixiecan," he ran as a "Dixiecrat" – his party was an offshoot of the Democratic Party. And when he lost, he went right back to being a Democrat. This whole brouhaha is about a former Democrat praising another former Democrat for what was once a Democrat policy.

Republicans made Southern Democrats drop the race nonsense when they entered the Republican Party. Democrats supported race discrimination, then for about three years they didn't, now they do again. They've just changed which race they think should be discriminated against. In the 1920s, the Democratic platforms didn't even call for anti-lynching legislation as the Republican platforms did.

Thurmond's Dixiecrat Party was not the only extremist spin-off from the Democratic Party in 1948. Henry Wallace, formerly FDR's vice president and agriculture secretary, left the Democratic Party that year to form the communist-dominated and Soviet-backed "Progressive Party." Much as Thurmond's Dixiecrat Party was expressly pro-segregation, Wallace's Progressive Party was expressly pro-Soviet.

Indeed, this was the apex of Moscow-directed subversion of U.S. politics. The Progressive Party platform excluded even the mildest criticism of Soviet aggression. It will come as no surprise that many American celebrities supported Wallace. The Progressives received 1 million votes nationwide, about the same as Thurmond's Dixiecrat Party.

Thurmond went on to reject segregation, become a Republican, and serve his country well as a U.S. senator. By contrast, running a communist-dominated presidential campaign was Wallace's last hurrah. Yet only an off-the-cuff remark at a birthday party praising Thurmond's presidential campaign is the career-destroyer. Not so fawning references to Wallace's Soviet-backed presidential campaign.

Just two years before Lott's remarks, a hagiographic book on Wallace's life was released, titled "American Dreamer." How about a book about a segregationist titled "American Dreamer"? Wallace's version of the American "dream" was communism every bit as much as Strom Thurmond's dream was segregation. Aren't dreams of murderous dictators, gulags and death camps at least comparable in evil to segregated lunch counters?

The dust jacket on "American Dreamer" featured a nauseating statement of praise by U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy. Kennedy said that the book deserved "to be read by all who care about the American dream." The American dream: communist totalitarianism. Why wasn't the lecherous liberal asked to retire for his flattering remarks about a proven Soviet fifth columnist?

In 1999, the Clinton administration dedicated a room at the Agriculture Department to Wallace. At the dedication, former Democratic presidential candidate George McGovern gave a speech explicitly praising Wallace's pro-Soviet positions, such as the idea that the Cold War was "overdone" and that "problems" between the nations "could not be resolved by military means."

McGovern fondly recalled that he himself had voted for Wallace. He chipperly reminded the audience that he had run for president in 1972 "on a similar platform" – with the help of a young Yale law school graduate named Bill Clinton. Inasmuch as Trent Lott was in kindergarten in 1948, he did not vote for Thurmond. He did not run on a "similar" platform to the Dixiecrats. He did not write a jacket-flap endorsement calling a segregationist an "American Dreamer."

The idea that Lott took the occasion of an old timer's birthday to introduce a new policy initiative to bring back segregation – a Democrat policy – is ludicrous. Lott is a fine fellow; he just has some sort of liberal-Tourette's syndrome that makes him spout Democrat ideas at random. A few years ago, Lott practically wanted to give the adulterous Air Force pilot Kelly Flinn a silver star for her service. Remember that?

Up until two weeks ago, conservatives were clamoring for Lott's removal precisely because of his annoying habit of saying dumb things. (Showing their inferior intellect, liberals have only recently figured that out.) Republicans should ask Lott to step down as leader, but only for all the nice things he's said about Teddy Kennedy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Special Offer!

Ann Coulter's newest blockbuster is here! "Slander" hammers liberals who use lies to vilify their opponents. Autographed copies now available through WorldNetDaily's online store!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ann Coulter, well-known for her television appearances as a political analyst, is an attorney and author. Dubbed "one of the 20 most fascinating women in politics" by George magazine, Coulter has appeared on ABC's "This Week," "Good Morning America," NBC's "Today," "Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher," CNN's "Larry King Live" and CNBC's "Rivera Live."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; trentlott
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 541-546 next last
To: EternalVigilance; Sabertooth
#98: Excellent Post. I'm surrounded by greatness. I look to my left, I look to my right - and what do I see? SENSE!!!

Brace yourselves, I hear the "CUSTER CAUCUS" on the move!
121 posted on 12/18/2002 5:18:39 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
"No kiddin?"

Whu?
122 posted on 12/18/2002 5:19:03 PM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Saying the same thing in different words (#14), a C-SPAN caller this morning : "Trent Lott is not anchored in principal."
123 posted on 12/18/2002 5:20:15 PM PST by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
"I can't wait to see what tomorrow's looks like."

Keep it on the Bat Channel FReeper! It gets better every day!
124 posted on 12/18/2002 5:20:22 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
I look to my left, I look to my right - and what do I see?

Me, on my way to see the The Two Towers.

Later




125 posted on 12/18/2002 5:21:59 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Honestly...

I think it comes down to alot of people who simply dont find Lott's upbringing or past actions with regard to race relations to be offensive and yes...even some who subtly embrace a separate but equal mindset.
126 posted on 12/18/2002 5:22:17 PM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
"Farmer John center cut bacon?"

Don't go there yet...you'll ruin the surprise! Didn't your parents teach you that anticipation is the height of the chase? LOL!
127 posted on 12/18/2002 5:22:49 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Lucky kitty!
128 posted on 12/18/2002 5:22:52 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: KansasConservative
"What do you make of tonight's news that most of the Republican Senators want him to stay? Last night I thought he was a goner."

Lott gets on the phone, deals and promises are made. At least that's what I believe has happened. No principles, just power and pork.


129 posted on 12/18/2002 5:22:55 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Your desires don't count anymore. The chute opened before Lott hit terminal velocity. The tide has turned. The cards are on the table. Life is an open book.

Lott ain't going nowhere. He told Bush that and apparently he meant it.

And now we are stuck with an even weaker majority leader.

130 posted on 12/18/2002 5:23:19 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
"...yet for some reason there are so-called Conservatives still pulling for Lott."

The Custer Caucus.

131 posted on 12/18/2002 5:24:54 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
I think it comes down to alot of people who simply dont find Lott's upbringing or past actions with regard to race relations to be offensive and yes...even some who subtly embrace a separate but equal mindset.

You should have the balls to address you're nasty insinuations to the people you're referring to.

132 posted on 12/18/2002 5:25:35 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Why would anyone want to give them two years of soundbites and attack ads in 2004, even as Lott is led by the nose to redeem himself at the expense of party and country?

Sometimes it takes people right up to the very last move before they believe they have been in mate since yesterday.

133 posted on 12/18/2002 5:27:47 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Lott gets on the phone, deals and promises are made. At least that's what I believe has happened. No principles, just power and pork.

That's too bad. Apparently at this time he has 18 votes, he needs 8 more. We shall see.

134 posted on 12/18/2002 5:27:48 PM PST by KansasConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
"But I'm arguing that Lott is going to stay now because you've been played like a violin and you can look forward to lots of hate crimes, hate speech, hate thoughts and hate inferred thoughts legislation coming out of the senate."

Well, I'll go ahead and give you a pass because I honestly respect you greatly. I believe in righteous civil rights and Lott doesn't; heck, he believes in NOTHING. And...come here....a litttttle closer......I knew the game and I believe we get to win now. We were losing with Lott in ML; it was only a matter of time. We are better off without him as ML, and he did it himself.
135 posted on 12/18/2002 5:28:00 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
(Henry) Wallace's Progressive Party was expressly pro-Soviet... (it) was the apex of Moscow-directed subversion of U.S. politics.

...Just two years before Lott's remarks, a hagiographic book on Wallace's life was released, titled "American Dreamer."... Wallace's version of the American "dream" was communism

... The dust jacket on "American Dreamer" featured a nauseating statement of praise by U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy. Kennedy said that the book deserved "to be read by all who care about the American dream." The American dream: communist totalitarianism.

... In 1999, the Clinton administration dedicated a room at the Agriculture Department to Wallace. At the dedication, former Democratic presidential candidate George McGovern gave a speech explicitly praising Wallace's pro-Soviet positions,... McGovern fondly recalled that he himself had voted for Wallace.

Just in case anybody missed it, I thought I would emphasize these tiny, little-known nuggets.

136 posted on 12/18/2002 5:28:02 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
"even some who subtly embrace a separate but equal mindset."

How about "lifts and separates?"

And velco back snaps. Or at least written directions.
137 posted on 12/18/2002 5:29:21 PM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
"even some who subtly embrace a separate but equal mindset."

How about "lifts and separates?"

And velco back snaps. Or at least written directions.
138 posted on 12/18/2002 5:29:21 PM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
"The good part is you can bookmark my observations and make me eat them if I'm wrong"

You'll have to come find me because I won't chase you down with crow in hand....BLT, well.....LOL!
139 posted on 12/18/2002 5:30:13 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
Freudian that I studdered twice there. Viagra flashback.
140 posted on 12/18/2002 5:30:41 PM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 541-546 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson